Priority System for Enhancements

Max Kanat-Alexander mkanat at
Tue Feb 27 21:47:59 UTC 2007

	During our most recent meeting (you'll see minutes and so
forth, soon), justdave suggested that we come up with a long-term

	To assist this (or basically implement it), I'm going to be
prioritizing enhancements.

	P1 = We definitely want this. It's a major feature, and it's
obvious that it would be useful to everybody.

	P2 = We want this, but it's not totally clear or extremely

	P3 = This isn't a bad idea, and maybe we'll want to implement
it at some point in the future, but it's not near-term roadmap
material. Some core Bugzilla developer may work on it.

	P4 = This isn't a terrible idea, but it's not important to our
long-term plans for Bugzilla. We would review a patch if somebody
posted it, but a core developer is unlikely to work on it.

	P5 = We basically never want this. If somebody implements it
and asks for review, we *might* look at it.

	Also, if you're a reviewer, feel free to prioritize
enhancements like this. Just remember that a P1 should be really
obviously needed, and we should basically all agree that it's needed.

Competent, Friendly Bugzilla Services. And Everything Else, too.

More information about the developers mailing list