making review/bug filing optional for some docs changes

[Myk Melez]

Maxwell Kanat-Alexander wrote:

>On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 18:24 -0800, Myk Melez wrote:
>  
>
>>Filing the bug and getting review took more time than making the change 
>>and checking it in, which is tremendously inefficient for patches like 
>>this with a high likelihood of being good as is (or at least good enough).
>>    
>>
>
>	Yeah, looks like we just need more docs reviewers.
>
I didn't include time waiting for review, and I didn't have any problem 
getting review, so there was no dearth of review resources in this 
case.  The time I spent just filing the bug, attaching the patch, 
requesting review, and resolving the bug once the patch received review 
was greater than the time I spent making the patch and checking it in.

-myk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20050325/42a026cf/attachment.html>