Minimal version of Mail::Mailer
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Fri Feb 11 10:55:55 UTC 2005
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:34:49AM -0800, Maxwell Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 07:34 +0000, Gervase Markham wrote:
> > Actually, there is a benefit - if, for example, Mail::Mailer 1.61 is the
> > one shipped with Fedora Core 3 [snip]
>
> perl-MailTools-1.66 is in Fedora Extras at the moment, for Fedora Core
> 3. It's not shipped with RHEL3, so it would be a CPAN install or an
> ATrpms install for RHEL3 users.
ATrpms is at 1.62 and the bugzilla instances based on the packages
there seem to work fine, so perhaps 1.62 is already satisfying current
minimal requirements?
I'll upgrade MailTool at ATrpms just in case ;)
> perl-MailTools-1.64 is in the old Fedora.us Pre-Extras for Fedora Core
> 1.
>
> However, Debian Stable is probably MUCH older than all of this.
>
> Still, I do think that 1.61 is actually the real bottom requirement for
> Mail::Mailer for Bugzilla (from reading the ChangeLog), so we should
> reflect it accurately in the code if it's the case.
You mean it is lower or higher?
Thanks.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20050211/d4dff0c4/attachment.sig>
More information about the developers
mailing list