MattyT matty at
Thu Oct 24 09:21:52 UTC 2002

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 17:50, Bradley Baetz wrote:

> We do require 2 reviews for schema changes, and the request stuff
> certainly got at least 2 reviews, with several people looking over it. I 
> still don't see a problem with per-component stuff for this. The problem 
> with moving between products/components was noted _before_ checkin, and 
> allowed to go through since the current code didn't handle it, ie it 
> wasn't a regression.

There's no call to start worrying about attachment statuses.  All that's
necessary is to post notification here.

And as for per-component, I don't recall having heard of it, so it can't
have been raised to much.  I don't read *every* message, but if there
was a thread for each enhancement design, it would go a long way to
ensuring everyone knows about everything.

         Matthew Tuck: Software Developer & All-Round Nice Guy        
 My Short Autobiography: 1985 Grade Bin Monitor 1990 Class Clown Award
1992 Awarded Most Likely To Spontaneously Combust 1996 Crowned Galactic
         Emperor 1998 Released From Smith Psychiatric Hospital

More information about the developers mailing list