Proposal for target milestones

Damien damien.nozay at
Tue Sep 2 16:47:56 UTC 2014

thanks for the clarification.

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Byron Jones <glob at> wrote:

> Damien wrote:
>  The Target Milestone currently serves two purposes: flagging bugs we
>> think would be nice to include in a given release (the next one or a
>> future one), and flagging bugs that have been fixed (but not necessarily
>> flagged ahead of time) and will be included in the next version.  The
>> white board tag, e.g. [Roadmap: 5.0], is used to denote bugs that we
>> think *really* should be in that release.
> Are we making assumptions there? What if a team wants to follow agile
> processes?
> Would that become a tedious activity?
> [snip]
>   This is making the assumption that people work on what they want to
> work on
> rather than on what they have been appointed to work on. Not all processes
> are like that. It's okay for you to say it should be one way or another for
> bmo, but for users out there, please consider that it is not the only
> workflow.
> i think you may have miss-understood the context of this email.
> we are discussing how the bugzilla team intend to track development on
> bugzilla itself.
> these changes don't have any impact on any other teams or bugzilla
> installations.
> -glob
> --
> byron jones - :glob - team -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the developers mailing list