Bug Relationships

Jesse J. Clark jjclark1982 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 5 18:02:25 UTC 2010

On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Guy Pyrzak wrote:

> Sorry to be a buzz kill, but maybe this discussion should be happening on the bug?
> -Guy

Bug 251556 is one piece of the puzzle, but it's nice to have this discussion of how to move forward with bug link fields. Here is how I imagine we could progress toward Gerv's design:

- Relationship trees. Bug 539131
- Reverse Editability. This gets into a lot of permissions issues, some of which we have worked out in PRACA.
- Multiplicability. Should be similar to FIELD_TYPE_MULTI_SELECT.
- Migration of non-custom link fields
- Combined relationship editing widget

This still doesn't address Max's plans for fully-mutual relationships between separate bug trackers.

More information about the developers mailing list