Bug Relationships

[Jesse J. Clark]

On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Guy Pyrzak wrote:

> Sorry to be a buzz kill, but maybe this discussion should be happening on the bug?
> 
> -Guy
> 

Bug 251556 is one piece of the puzzle, but it's nice to have this discussion of how to move forward with bug link fields. Here is how I imagine we could progress toward Gerv's design:

- Relationship trees. Bug 539131
- Reverse Editability. This gets into a lot of permissions issues, some of which we have worked out in PRACA.
- Multiplicability. Should be similar to FIELD_TYPE_MULTI_SELECT.
- Migration of non-custom link fields
- Combined relationship editing widget


This still doesn't address Max's plans for fully-mutual relationships between separate bug trackers.