Configuration object

[Gervase Markham]

On 16/11/09 20:31, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> On 11/16/2009 01:55 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> Surely they are more likely to have the ID? After all, isn't it true
>> that group names can in some cases be confidential, and that's why the
>> IDs are exposed and used on the process_bug edit interface?
>
> 	To be honest, I've never interacted with groups via the API, so I think
> you would know better than me.

I'm just quoting something I thought I heard you say a while back - that 
group names of groups a person is not a member of are considered 
confidential. Isn't that right?

If that is true, it seems to make sense that sometimes a user will have 
an ID and not a name, and so we should make IDs primary.

> 	I'd like to make things work based on how Bugzilla should ideally be
> working (that is, as it will be working in the future) because that way
> we don't have to change things or aren't left around with legacy cruft
> when Bugzilla does "catch up" in some areas. This is, of course, as long
> as this strategy doesn't interfere with making certain features work now.

Absolutely :-)

Gerv

_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla