Simpler Bugzilla

[Guy Pyrzak]

So while I'm happy that there is an interest in the simplification. And i
have yet to find anyone who thinks it is a bad idea, and I think most of us
are in agreement that the solution is to make the "default" fields into
custom fields. However, the problem is the lack of people with the time to
implement the changes. We could supply a bunch of mocks that simplify the UI
etc, but we'll need some folks (more than me) to implement them, which it
seems like we're lacking.

If there isn't a meta bug for this already lets start one and start filing
some bugs. I'll be happy to supply multiple mocks of various ideas that
people on this list have as well as my own, but I want to know who is
willing to help implement these changes?

-Guy

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Emmanuel Seyman <eseyman at linagora.com>wrote:

> * Gervase Markham [31/07/2008 07:03] :
> >
> > Nope. But perhaps we could look at what we provide that Trac doesn't,
> > and use that as a starting point for discussion :-)
>
> Let's start with bug entry, then.
>
> Fields that Trac doesn't ask on bug entry that Bugzilla does :
>
> - OS
> - Hardware
> - URL
> - Initial State
> - Depends on
> - Blocks
>
> OS and Hardware, we've talked about.
> URL could easily be activated by a 'useurl' params.
> Removing Initial state would be a regression more than anything else.
> Depends on and Blocks, I'm torn about.
>
> Emmanuel
> _______________________________________________
> dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
> dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=guy.pyrzak@gmail.com>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20080804/7a2eadd9/attachment.html>