Adding an XML-RPC to append comments
Jeff Lasslett
jeff.lasslett at datataker.com.au
Mon May 21 06:58:49 UTC 2007
Thanks Mads,
Next time I make a patch I will definitely follow the guidelines you've
pointed out to me. I guess I was informally offering up that bit of
code (Bug.remove). I don't mind if it's not used. :-)
Thanks also for the tip re: file permissions and diff. I'll keep an eye
out for that. :-)
I did notice the disciplined approach to documentation in the patch
245546.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 08:14 +0200, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> torsdag 17 maj 2007 08:58 skrev Jeff Lasslett:
> > Thanks Max,
> >
> > After patching the original (v3.0) Bug.pm with patch attachment #245546
> >
> > My script produces the following when trying to call 'Bug.create':
> >
> > I don't see why Bugzilla::WebService::Bug can no longer be located.
>
> Risking the wrath of the gurus for answering this: I have found, that when
> using "patch", it often changes the status bits of the files. I usually need
> to chmod a bit to get it working again, or running the update script.
>
> And, while I am at it, you need to read:
> http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/contributor.html
> to understand the bugzilla "rules" on contributions. It will make it a lot
> easier for you! :-)
>
> Also, in order to get any patch for the XML-RPC accepted, you need to follow
> the rules for returning error codes, and you need to document the methods you
> add, following the rules for that! I know from experience, that it can take a
> while to get it rigth == getting a reviewer to approve. OTOH, there is no
> question that the sort-of rigid process improves the final result.
>
> One of these days I will fix the stuff the reviewer (Max) has pointed out in
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355847
> - currently waiting for a bugzilla 3.0 update on our main installation...
>
> Regards,
>
> Mads
>
More information about the developers
mailing list