docs in a wiki [was Re: making review/bug filing optional for

[Tomas Kopal]

Well, what about treating wiki as sort of "landfill" of documentation? 
Anyone can make an attempt to make the docs better, and some "reviewers" 
will be overlooking the changes. Approval from any of the reviewers 
would mean taking the changes from wiki and putting them back to the 
docbook sources, which will be the only "official" documentation.

It would be necessary to find a way how to propagate these changes from 
wiki to docbook automatically, though.

Tomas

On 03/21/05 00:47, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Myk Melez wrote:
> 
>>> We do actually have a wiki we can use already if we want it at 
>>> http://wiki.mozilla.org/ . Would be easy enough to create a namespace 
>>> for Bugzilla on there.
>>
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea.  We can always give it a try and see if it 
>> results in better or worse documentation.
> 
> 
> If it results in worse documentation, how do we change back?
> 
> Having said that, if putting the docs in a Wiki lowers the barrier to 
> change and makes people more comfortable with the idea of just going in 
> and fixing stuff, I'm all for it.
> 
> Gerv
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=Tomas.Kopal@altap.cz>
>