RESOLVED/... (was RE: We have a QA Manager!)

Luis Villa luis.villa at
Tue Jul 12 14:48:16 UTC 2005

On 7/12/05, Luis Villa <luis.villa at> wrote:
> On 7/12/05, Gervase Markham <gerv at> wrote:
> > Benton, Kevin wrote:
> > > EWWW!  Since you brought it up, I think this RESOLVED/LATER and
> > > RESOLVED/... for things that really don't resolve the issue should be
> > > changed to something that tells the real story, especially for process
> > > monitoring software.
> >
> > I completely agree about REMIND and LATER, but I do think that MOVED is
> > a resolution, because it means that no further work should be done on
> > this bug in this place.
> Thirded. Does this mean we can get a patch for bug 13534 into 2.20?
> Luis (who realizes that Kevin is a newbie, and so has an excuse for
> not realizing there has been a bug open about REMIND/LATER for *six
> years*.)

Hrm. This may not have come out quite right, probably should have put
newbie in quotes. Kevin is only a newbie relative to the age of that
completely embarassing bug.


More information about the developers mailing list