Drop Upgrade Support for 2.8?

Maxwell Kanat-Alexander mkanat at kerio.com
Thu Feb 24 19:32:28 UTC 2005

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:23 +0000, Gervase Markham wrote:
> But if we fix problems like the one above, then it doesn't matter how 
> far back you go. If 2.8 upgrades successfully to 2.10, and 2.10 to 2.12, 
> and so on, then everything is fine.

	Yeah. Actually, as far as I know, at this point 2.8 does upgrade
gracefully to 2.10. I'm not sure at what point the 2.x series broke
upgrades from 2.8, but it looks like it was probably around the time
that target_milestone's default was set to '---'. I'd have to look
around in cvs blame a bit.


More information about the developers mailing list