Drop Upgrade Support for 2.8?

[Maxwell Kanat-Alexander]

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:23 +0000, Gervase Markham wrote:
> But if we fix problems like the one above, then it doesn't matter how 
> far back you go. If 2.8 upgrades successfully to 2.10, and 2.10 to 2.12, 
> and so on, then everything is fine.

	Yeah. Actually, as far as I know, at this point 2.8 does upgrade
gracefully to 2.10. I'm not sure at what point the 2.x series broke
upgrades from 2.8, but it looks like it was probably around the time
that target_milestone's default was set to '---'. I'd have to look
around in cvs blame a bit.

	-Max