Drop Upgrade Support for 2.8?

[Shane H. W. Travis]

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:

> 	If people really are still using 2.8, they can probably upgrade to
> 2.16 or 2.18 or even 2.12 first, and then upgrade from there on out.

This seems reasonable. They aren't prevented from upgrading... they simply
have to do it in two discrete steps.

If we decide to go this route, please open up a docs bug on it, with a high
priority.

Shane H.W. Travis       | The greatest of all mistakes is to do nothing
travis at sedsystems.ca    |  because you can only do a little.
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan |   Do what you can.  -- Sydney Smith