2.17?

[Andrew Sobala]

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 15:56, Luis Villa wrote:
> Hey, guys-
> 
> Looks like a couple of bugzilla 'core' folks were looking for me and aes
> last night to discuss b.g.o moving to 2.17 instead of 2.16. And of
> course we totally missed each other, since I was on the plane and I
> suppose aes was still recovering from exams. :) 
> 
> What's the situation? Greg mentioned specific features you think will
> help us upgrade... I'd been listening for such things but had missed
> them :) What specific things did you have in mind? I personally would
> definitely love lots of the stuff that is in 2.17, but I think aes had
> thought (and I agreed, since I'm not doing the work, he is) that the
> delta was big enough that we'd have to throw out most of our current
> work to do it.
> 

Hey :-),

If upgrading to 2.17 is quite painless, I'd be happy to do it. The thing
is, to upgrade to 2.16, all we need to do is minor templatisation.
That's _it_. I was going to do the final template stuff over the
weekend, and I tested importing our database into the 2.16 system a
couple of weeks ago, and it worked.

My personal opinion is we should go for 2.16, then maybe look
immediately at what we'd need to change for 2.17 since I presume that
will be released as a stable 2.18 soon-ish. I might be making that up.
However, I'd really like to hear what the bugzilla people have to say.

Thanks,

-- 
Andrew Sobala <aes at gnome.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20040116/07510ce4/attachment.sig>