aes at gnome.org
Fri Jan 16 17:07:20 UTC 2004
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 15:56, Luis Villa wrote:
> Hey, guys-
> Looks like a couple of bugzilla 'core' folks were looking for me and aes
> last night to discuss b.g.o moving to 2.17 instead of 2.16. And of
> course we totally missed each other, since I was on the plane and I
> suppose aes was still recovering from exams. :)
> What's the situation? Greg mentioned specific features you think will
> help us upgrade... I'd been listening for such things but had missed
> them :) What specific things did you have in mind? I personally would
> definitely love lots of the stuff that is in 2.17, but I think aes had
> thought (and I agreed, since I'm not doing the work, he is) that the
> delta was big enough that we'd have to throw out most of our current
> work to do it.
If upgrading to 2.17 is quite painless, I'd be happy to do it. The thing
is, to upgrade to 2.16, all we need to do is minor templatisation.
That's _it_. I was going to do the final template stuff over the
weekend, and I tested importing our database into the 2.16 system a
couple of weeks ago, and it worked.
My personal opinion is we should go for 2.16, then maybe look
immediately at what we'd need to change for 2.17 since I presume that
will be released as a stable 2.18 soon-ish. I might be making that up.
However, I'd really like to hear what the bugzilla people have to say.
Andrew Sobala <aes at gnome.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the developers