Strategic features (was Slashdot article)
Matty
mattyt at tpg.com.au
Sun Dec 12 04:10:07 UTC 2004
On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:17 +0200, Vlad Dascalu wrote:
> Following the Slashdot article, I took a closer took to our competition
> and I came up with a strategic feature list that we should implement as
> a priority. Our competition has all of the below features (and more!):
Some of these sound a little bit ambiguous. Custfields and shared
queries are in the system, but I don't really know what the others are
supposed to mean.
Can you file RFEs as appropriate, or give pointers to bug numbers?
More information about the developers
mailing list