Strategic features (was Slashdot article)

Matty mattyt at tpg.com.au
Sun Dec 12 04:10:07 UTC 2004


On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 21:17 +0200, Vlad Dascalu wrote:

> Following the Slashdot article, I took a closer took to our competition 
> and I came up with a strategic feature list that we should implement as 
> a priority. Our competition has all of the below features (and more!):

Some of these sound a little bit ambiguous.  Custfields and shared
queries are in the system, but I don't really know what the others are
supposed to mean.

Can you file RFEs as appropriate, or give pointers to bug numbers?






More information about the developers mailing list