Status: Resolved Later
chicks at chicks.net
Thu Dec 9 15:47:13 UTC 2004
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Kevin Benton wrote:
> I'm wondering - does it make more sense to create a pending status with
> a reason code than to change status to resolved later because the issue
> (if set to resolved later) in my interpretation, really isn't resolved,
> but instead, put on the "back burner."
Why not make a priority level for back burner and not change the status?
> It seems to me that a resolved status should point to the issue is
> resolved pending verification, and no more work needs to be done to fix
> Pending as a status, to me, says that work may still need to be done
> pending some factor.
Why does pending need to be its own status?
> Pending verification doesn't seem like a good status either because it
> suggests that the developers still have more work to do after
> verification is done. If more work has to be done after verification,
> then verification must be re-done.
> Anyway, just a few musing/ramblings on that particular process.
Musing is good.
"Fans of Mozilla's free, open-source Firefox browser make the
ardent Apple faithful look like a bunch of slackers."
- Rebecca Lieb at clickz.com
More information about the developers