Summary of comments on Slashdot article
suson at TuckerEnergy.com
Mon Dec 6 17:58:14 UTC 2004
I would have to agree with the dependency issues. I think it's great
that Bugzilla is planning on providing RPM's, but I do request that the
SRPM's of all such RPM's be available also.
Thanks in advance,
Christopher Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Kevin Benton wrote:
>> I would agree that on my home Fedora Core 1 system, it was very
>> difficult to install because of the very large number of CPAN
>> libraries that were required and many didn't install properly 'out of
>> the box.' Does that mean that Bugzilla itself was difficult to
>> install? No, but to get to the point where installation could be
>> done was very difficult.
> This sort of thing would really be best handled by making a set of
> RPM's that make Bugzilla installation automatic. I'm working on such
> RPM's for Fedora currently actually. :) I'd like to get some changes
> pushed upstream to the Fedora httpd rpm, but I haven't even embarked
> on that journey yet. I expect to release something after Christmas.
More information about the developers