Test Case Manager for Bugzilla

[Fuentetaja, Ed]

Markham, Gervase wrote:
>From a 30-second look, I'd say that it would be cool to have a unit 
>test add-on for Bugzilla, but we wouldn't want it to be part of the
core 
>- that way lies bloat.

I totally agree with you. Not everyone using Bugzilla needs a test case 
management system. TestRunner should be some kind of optional add-on or 
plugin.

>The UI seems quite confusing, with a lot of jargon. (This is not your 
>fault, presumably. :-) It's hard to work out how it works, and what all

>the bits do, and why they are there.

Well, I didn't find the interface that confusing, maybe because I've 
used other test case management applications in the past, or maybe I'm
accustomed to the jargon.

I've added a link to the Test Runner manual to the main page:
http://129.118.91.112/bugzilla16

>zach at zachlipton.com was working on a test case management system called

>Litmus - perhaps you two should hook up.

Thanks, this is the first time I heard of Litmus. Anyway, testrunner is
a finished product (well, as finished as any software product can be),
it
works, and does everything I ask to this kind of tool. I think I'm gonna

stick with it and propose it as the test case tool for our department.

Thanks for your input,

	Ed