Living without Custom Fields

[Gervase Markham]

J. Paul Reed wrote:
> If this is going to the project's "official answer" to this feature, then I
> would change the following:

Well, currently it's not official in any way.

> Anyway, I think it's a good document, but if we're going to point people at
> it, I think it needs to be a bit... friendlier. We shouldn't act like
> people are stupid for wanting custom fields, which I think some of this
> text borders on (mostly what I noted in 1 and 2).

It's a fair point. You know me: I speak my mind :-) But I'll tone it 
down a bit.

Gerv