Of CSS and XHTML (was: Re: J2EE)
J. Paul Reed
preed at sigkill.com
Thu Dec 4 21:21:00 UTC 2003
On 04 Dec 2003 at 15:49:55, David Miller arranged the bits on my disk to say:
> My official stance at this point is that I wouldn't mind subjecting NS4
> users to that type of layout. As long as it's still functional for them
> and we don't actually prevent them from using it.
Someone else already touched on this, but why are we supporting NS4 *at
all*?
It made sense when Mozilla was still 0.6/0.7/0.9, but we're long past a
stable 1.0 and even into a stable 1.4 series. I don't think wasting
developer time and subjecting Mozilla (and maybe even IE) users to poor
layout and presentation because we're trying to cater to (non-existent, as
far as I can tell) NS4 users is a valid engineering decision.
Put another way: what are the stats on bmo? What percentage of people are
using NS4? Mozilla? IE?
Or--if you think those are biased--let's ask one of the other publicly
available BZ sites (Linux kernel or Apache maybe) if they could share those
stats with us.
Later,
Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Paul Reed -- 0xDF8708F8 || preed at sigkill.com || web.sigkill.com/preed
Math, my dear boy, is nothing more than the lesbian sister of biology.
-- Peter Griffin, Family Guy
I use PGP; you should use PGP too... if only to piss off John Ashcroft
More information about the developers
mailing list