Configurable Access On Value Transitions?
MattyT
matty at chariot.net.au
Sat Sep 14 02:33:16 UTC 2002
On Sat, 2002-09-14 at 03:19, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Any sort of Configurable Access Policies will require extra database
> lookups for each change, to make sure the changes are allowed. I share
> Myk's concerns about performance;
Like I said, you only need to sacrifice performance if it's actually
used. Long term, we could do something like bug #
> if ($field eq "foo" &&
> $from = "somevalue" &&
> $to = "someothervalue" &&
> !UserInGroup("somegroup")
> {
> reject = 1;
> }
It is _way_ too much to ask administrators to become Perl hackers in
order to satisfy such a major, needed feature as per-field access
policies. For per-transition policies, maybe it isn't.
--
Matthew Tuck: Software Developer & All-Round Nice Guy
My Short Autobiography: 1985 Grade Bin Monitor 1990 Class Clown Award
1992 Awarded Most Likely To Spontaneously Combust 1996 Crowned Galactic
Emperor 1998 Released From Smith Psychiatric Hospital
More information about the developers
mailing list