Target Date - Bug 103636
Jeff Hedlund
jeff.hedlund at matrixsi.com
Mon Oct 21 16:27:07 UTC 2002
Some comments on bug 103636
(http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103636) state that custom
fields should take care of this feature.
I still disagree due to the more integrated nature of the target_date
field, and so I would like to hash it out on the developers mailing list.
Reasons I believe it should not be a custom field:
Integrated into the importance sort
Handling of the "emtpy" date
Gut feeling :)
The way I handled the empty date is by putting the value 9999-12-31.
The reason I am using that is for better sorting (so that bugs with
dates will be sorted higher than those without). But in order for that
to look right, I filter out any date with 9999 so the user sees an empty
date and not this funky 9999-12-31 date.
Thoughts?
Jeff
--
/\ /\ .. .. .. jeff.hedlund at matrixsi.com
/ \/ \ a t r i x . . . . . . . (770) 794-7233
s o f t w a r e i n c .. .. .. http://www.matrixsi.com
More information about the developers
mailing list