From rui at rosado.nl Mon Feb 6 11:48:25 2017 From: rui at rosado.nl (Rui Rosado) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:48:25 +0100 Subject: mod_version has to be loaded in Apache Message-ID: <1222e1a8-6684-5084-1715-d11123522ec3@rosado.nl> Hi everybody, I would like to point out a lack (IMHO) in the Bugzilla instructions for installling Apache on Windows (3.5.2. Apache on Windows#3.5.2.1. Installing ) This paragraph lacks the instruction to uncomment the line 'LoadModule version_module modules/mod_version.so' in ./conf/httpd.conf (Apache) If I *do not* uncomment that line our Bugzilla's main page will show up without any 'decoration': just plain text links and edit-boxes. The reason is that all the .htaccess files under \bugzilla directory and its subdirectories contain: , so they are referring to mod_version.so If mod_version.so is not made available, all the lines in the .htaccess files with 'Deny from all' or 'Allow from all' will cause erros to be logged in Apache's error.log file. After making mod_version.so available to Apache everything works great for us. I am not an Apache or Bugzilla expert, and therefore I do not know if this is the only (right) solution. But if it is mentioned in the installation instruction, it could prevent people pulling out their hairs. Regards, Rui Rosado -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rui at rosado.nl Wed Feb 8 09:41:20 2017 From: rui at rosado.nl (Rui Rosado) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:41:20 +0100 Subject: Corrections in .htaccess for Apache 2.4 In-Reply-To: <1222e1a8-6684-5084-1715-d11123522ec3@rosado.nl> References: <1222e1a8-6684-5084-1715-d11123522ec3@rosado.nl> Message-ID: <92bcdd06-ea95-22c9-1b91-8a8dad05a2b1@rosado.nl> Hi again, To complete my previous post ('mod_version has to be loaded in Apache'): Th directives in the .htaccess of all directories in the /bugzilla directory tree do not conform to the new format for Apache 2.4. Please refer to this page about 'Upgrading to 2.4 from 2.2' on the Apache website (paragraph 'Run-Time Configuration Changes'): https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html It boils down to replacing all: Deny from all = 2.4> Deny from all by Deny from all = 2.4> Require all denied and all Allow from all = 2.4> Allow from all by Allow from all = 2.4> Require all granted in all .htaccess files (11x). Note: the elements are OK because they conform to the Apache 2.2 syntax. Best regards, Rui Rosado -------- Doorgestuurd bericht -------- Onderwerp: mod_version has to be loaded in Apache Datum: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:48:25 +0100 Van: Rui Rosado Organisatie: Rosado Beheer BV Aan: developers at bugzilla.org Hi everybody, I would like to point out a lack (IMHO) in the Bugzilla instructions for installling Apache on Windows (3.5.2. Apache on Windows#3.5.2.1. Installing ) This paragraph lacks the instruction to uncomment the line 'LoadModule version_module modules/mod_version.so' in ./conf/httpd.conf (Apache) If I *do not* uncomment that line our Bugzilla's main page will show up without any 'decoration': just plain text links and edit-boxes. The reason is that all the .htaccess files under \bugzilla directory and its subdirectories contain: , so they are referring to mod_version.so If mod_version.so is not made available, all the lines in the .htaccess files with 'Deny from all' or 'Allow from all' will cause erros to be logged in Apache's error.log file. After making mod_version.so available to Apache everything works great for us. I am not an Apache or Bugzilla expert, and therefore I do not know if this is the only (right) solution. But if it is mentioned in the installation instruction, it could prevent people pulling out their hairs. Regards, Rui Rosado -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com Fri Feb 10 11:48:57 2017 From: amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com (amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:48:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Regarding Automatic Duplicate Bug Report Detection Message-ID: Hi, I am a masters by research student at IIIT-Hyderabad, India. I am working in interdisciplinary research. Since, past 6 months I have been working on duplicate bug report detection techniques using neural language model (such as word2vec) [I also posted regarding help on the same project earlier]. We will be most probably submitting the work to SIGIR, 2017 or EMNLP 2017 conference for publication. I want to know if it is possible to work with the Mozilla Bugzilla Team as an intern or on a short term contract to take the project from academia to an actual implementation in the industry. Thanks, -A _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com Fri Feb 10 11:45:30 2017 From: amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com (j_b) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:45:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: Regarding Short Term Project with Mozilla Message-ID: <3396835b-57ac-4964-84b5-2e613554c590@googlegroups.com> Hi, I am a masters by research student at IIIT-Hyderabad, India. I am working in interdisciplinary research. Since, past 6 months I have been working on duplicate bug report detection techniques using neural language model (such as word2vec) [I also posted regarding help on the same project earlier]. We will be most probably submitting the work to SIGIR, 2017 or EMNLP 2017 conference for publication. I want to know if it is possible to work with the Mozilla Bugzilla Team as an intern or on a short term contract to take the project from academia to an actual implementation in the industry. Thanks, -A _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From gerv at mozilla.org Wed Feb 15 16:41:41 2017 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:41:41 +0000 Subject: Regarding Automatic Duplicate Bug Report Detection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1ec320db-a017-1bc6-0b56-71dab9fb4177@mozilla.org> On 10/02/17 11:48, amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com wrote: > I want to know if it is possible to work with the Mozilla Bugzilla > Team as an intern or on a short term contract to take the project > from academia to an actual implementation in the industry. The first person to speak to would probably by Dylan Hardison (dylan at mozilla dot com). But Mozilla has a formal process for internships so it may not be possible. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From gerv at mozilla.org Mon Feb 20 14:09:36 2017 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:09:36 +0000 Subject: Bugzilla Meeting for February is on Wednesday, 9pm UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 20/02/17 14:09, Gervase Markham wrote: > The next monthly Bugzilla public meeting will be on Wednesday February Unfortuately, I will not be able to be there, as I'm in the USA for work and I have a conference that day :-( Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From gerv at mozilla.org Mon Feb 20 14:09:01 2017 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:09:01 +0000 Subject: Bugzilla Meeting for February is on Wednesday, 9pm UTC Message-ID: The next monthly Bugzilla public meeting will be on Wednesday February 22nd, at 9pm UK time (1pm Pacific, 9pm UTC). http://arewemeetingyet.com/London/2017-02-22/21:00/Bugzilla%20Meeting Agenda is here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings Feel free to add stuff you want to talk about, and see you then :-) Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From justdave at bugzilla.org Wed Feb 22 21:04:12 2017 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (Dave Miller) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:04:12 -0500 Subject: Bugzilla Meeting for February is on Wednesday, 9pm UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <58ADFCCC.8030503@bugzilla.org> So this is the second month in a row we've canceled the meeting at the last minute because most of the project leads couldn't make it and we didn't have the people available who were supposed to talk on the items that were on the agenda. Should we pick a new time to have it? Seems like this one isn't working very well. Do we need to still be having a meeting? > Gervase Markham > February 20, 2017 at 9:09 AM > > Unfortuately, I will not be able to be there, as I'm in the USA for work > and I have a conference that day :-( > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list > dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > Gervase Markham > February 20, 2017 at 9:09 AM > The next monthly Bugzilla public meeting will be on Wednesday February > 22nd, at 9pm UK time (1pm Pacific, 9pm UTC). > http://arewemeetingyet.com/London/2017-02-22/21:00/Bugzilla%20Meeting > > Agenda is here: > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings > > Feel free to add stuff you want to talk about, and see you then :-) > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list > dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ Network Administrator, Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerv at mozilla.org Thu Feb 23 18:51:28 2017 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:51:28 -0800 Subject: Bugzilla Meeting for February is on Wednesday, 9pm UTC In-Reply-To: <58ADFCCC.8030503@bugzilla.org> References: <58ADFCCC.8030503@bugzilla.org> Message-ID: <9fd2729f-b566-3007-d5ca-a47ad4439b9b@mozilla.org> On 22/02/17 13:04, Dave Miller wrote: > So this is the second month in a row we've canceled the meeting at the > last minute because most of the project leads couldn't make it and we > didn't have the people available who were supposed to talk on the items > that were on the agenda. > > Should we pick a new time to have it? Seems like this one isn't working > very well. Do we need to still be having a meeting? I think the meeting is a good idea. But it would be good to fix it so people could actually attend, particularly Dylan. Dylan: are you able to generally be more forthcoming earlier about whether or not you can make it? It seems the fourth Wednesday of the month happens, by coincidence, to often coincide with my international travel! If we keep the meeting as-is, I will be unable to make it in March (CAB Forum), June (Mozilla All Hands), August (Policy Team Retreat) and December (Christmas). That's not a great hit rate - 6/10. Here are the full scores for "Wednesday-of-the-month", as my calendar looks now, from January to December inclusive: 1st Wed: YYYYYYYYYNYY - 1 unavailable 2nd Wed: YYYYYYNYYYYN - 2 unavailable 3rd Wed: YNYYYNYYYYYY - 2 unavailable 4th Wed: YNNYYNYNYYYN - 5 unavailable Last Wed: YYYYYNYYYYYN - 2 unavailable So it looks like 4th Wed is just unfortunately bad for me :-( Should we move to a different Wed? Gerv