From denis.roy at eclipse.org  Tue Oct  4 20:05:06 2016
From: denis.roy at eclipse.org (Denis Roy)
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:05:06 -0400
Subject: Need an anti-spam extension
Message-ID: <57F40B72.7030501@eclipse.org>

Greetings,

Since late last week, our bugzilla instances are being beaten up by
spammers. I'm desperately looking for an extension that will intercept
anything comment or bug committed. If the submitter has less than X
comments on Bugzilla and the post contains keywords matching REGEXP,
then block the bug or commment with an error.

I will pay $$ to have someone brew something up like this really
quickly.  Cleaning up this time consuming.

Apologies if this is not the right list for this.  If you know someone
who can do this, please reach me at denis.roy at eclipse.org

Thanks


From vladd at bugzilla.org  Tue Oct  4 20:44:47 2016
From: vladd at bugzilla.org (Vlad Dascalu)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 23:44:47 +0300
Subject: Need an anti-spam extension
In-Reply-To: <57F40B72.7030501@eclipse.org>
References: <57F40B72.7030501@eclipse.org>
Message-ID: <CAHzU5keYFS-qhYWNt1rh9EoRkAdvb7O8qb3nSq-GBG1oMb9xVg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

You might find some initial inspiration for this in the attachment posted
at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380489 , although that one
probably no longer applies cleanly.

Comment #18 in the same thread offers a link to a patch that implements a
Captcha system.

Disclaimer: neither of those two solutions were reviewed / approved by the
Bugzilla project.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Denis Roy <denis.roy at eclipse.org> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Since late last week, our bugzilla instances are being beaten up by
> spammers. I'm desperately looking for an extension that will intercept
> anything comment or bug committed. If the submitter has less than X
> comments on Bugzilla and the post contains keywords matching REGEXP,
> then block the bug or commment with an error.
>
> I will pay $$ to have someone brew something up like this really
> quickly.  Cleaning up this time consuming.
>
> Apologies if this is not the right list for this.  If you know someone
> who can do this, please reach me at denis.roy at eclipse.org
>
> Thanks
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <https://lists.bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=vladd at bugzilla.org>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20161004/930ede9e/attachment.html>

From dylan at mozilla.com  Tue Oct  4 21:42:31 2016
From: dylan at mozilla.com (Dylan Hardison)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 17:42:31 -0400
Subject: Need an anti-spam extension
In-Reply-To: <CAHzU5keYFS-qhYWNt1rh9EoRkAdvb7O8qb3nSq-GBG1oMb9xVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <57F40B72.7030501@eclipse.org> <CAHzU5keYFS-qhYWNt1rh9EoRkAdvb7O8qb3nSq-GBG1oMb9xVg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <45CEAB6E-CB14-439E-943F-DFAD5B75F351@mozilla.com>

Note that what Denis is proposing is quite similar to what BMO's AntiSpam extension does:
https://github.com/mozilla-bteam/bmo/blob/master/extensions/AntiSpam/Extension.pm

Meanwhile, the tracking bug for adding anti spam protections as a core feature
is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=bugzilla-spam

Note this is specific to prevenient /spam comments/ and spam accounts, it is not related to
email harvesting (which is getting easier with the change to login names in the unreleased 6.0).

> On Oct 4, 2016, at 16:44, Vlad Dascalu <vladd at bugzilla.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> You might find some initial inspiration for this in the attachment posted at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380489 , although that one probably no longer applies cleanly.
> 
> Comment #18 in the same thread offers a link to a patch that implements a Captcha system.
> 
> Disclaimer: neither of those two solutions were reviewed / approved by the Bugzilla project.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Denis Roy <denis.roy at eclipse.org> wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Since late last week, our bugzilla instances are being beaten up by
> spammers. I'm desperately looking for an extension that will intercept
> anything comment or bug committed. If the submitter has less than X
> comments on Bugzilla and the post contains keywords matching REGEXP,
> then block the bug or commment with an error.
> 
> I will pay $$ to have someone brew something up like this really
> quickly.  Cleaning up this time consuming.
> 
> Apologies if this is not the right list for this.  If you know someone
> who can do this, please reach me at denis.roy at eclipse.org
> 
> Thanks
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <https://lists.bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=vladd at bugzilla.org>



From amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com  Sat Oct 15 01:03:07 2016
From: amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com (amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Regarding Duplicate Bug Report Detection in Bugzilla
Message-ID: <66ec6848-4cb2-4078-b11d-c9700dc6a452@googlegroups.com>

Hi,
I am working on a research project on automatic detection of duplicate bug report detection. 
I am using the last 10 years of Mozilla bug reports(~750K) to do the ask in order to make it easier triager by getting the duplicate bug report in top-10. 
The results look promising quantitatively and we want to publish the result in a tier 1 conference.

For the same, we need Mozilla's help. We have about 600 sets of 10-words and we request Mozilla to help us do the quantitative evaluation on those. Basically for each set of 10-words, someone will have to say whether these words belong to the same topic. 

We would appreciate if Mozilla could help by asking its community to help with the labeling. 

Hoping to hear back.

Thanks,
Amar Budhiraja
Data Science and Analytics Centre
IIIT-Hyderabad
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com  Sat Oct 15 01:43:54 2016
From: amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com (amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Regarding Duplicate Bug Report Detection in Bugzilla
In-Reply-To: <mailman.4584.1476494128.18164.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
References: <66ec6848-4cb2-4078-b11d-c9700dc6a452@googlegroups.com>
	<mailman.4584.1476494128.18164.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <cf56008d-913e-46b6-8024-c14f2f6a5f6b@googlegroups.com>

Hi Emma,

Thank you for such a prompt reply. 
Please find my replies in-line.



On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 6:45:34 AM UTC+5:30, Emma Humphries wrote:
> Hi Amar,
> 
> Thanks for your inquiry. I'm CC'ing the Firefox community manager Mike Hoye
> on this in case he has volunteer resources available to help.
> 
> To clarify your request, do you want someone to verify if a group of words
> describes the same topic?

Yes. To add to it, I'd like to know if most of the words are under the same topic, not necessarily describe a topic. The rating would be 0/1.
 
> What level of experience/expertise will be needed to do this verification?
> Does the verify-er need to understand the product/component organization of
> bugzilla, understand Firefox source code, have programming experience?


Some level of product/component organization of Firefox is necessary. For example, a set of words that I encountered had words like email, reply etc with thunderbird. Programming experience is necessary to understand code jargons. No Source code knowledge is required.


> Do you have an estimate of how long this task would take, and do you have a
> sample of the data you need reviewed and verified?



In worst case, scenario all the words in the 10-word set could be unknown to the verify-er and hence, ideally she/he would search for it online. In such a case, it could take up to 2-3 minutes per 10-words set.

Sample of 10 such 10-word sets is here: 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwFxxPd1ZJkrbks3TUtoZkI4OTg/view?usp=sharing



Thanks,
Amar




> Thanks,
> 
> Emma Humphries
> Bugmaster
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:03 PM, <amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I am working on a research project on automatic detection of duplicate bug
> > report detection.
> > I am using the last 10 years of Mozilla bug reports(~750K) to do the ask
> > in order to make it easier triager by getting the duplicate bug report in
> > top-10.
> > The results look promising quantitatively and we want to publish the
> > result in a tier 1 conference.
> >
> > For the same, we need Mozilla's help. We have about 600 sets of 10-words
> > and we request Mozilla to help us do the quantitative evaluation on those.
> > Basically for each set of 10-words, someone will have to say whether these
> > words belong to the same topic.
> >
> > We would appreciate if Mozilla could help by asking its community to help
> > with the labeling.
> >
> > Hoping to hear back.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amar Budhiraja
> > Data Science and Analytics Centre
> > IIIT-Hyderabad
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
> > dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla
> >


On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 6:45:34 AM UTC+5:30, Emma Humphries wrote:
> Hi Amar,
> 
> Thanks for your inquiry. I'm CC'ing the Firefox community manager Mike Hoye
> on this in case he has volunteer resources available to help.
> 
> To clarify your request, do you want someone to verify if a group of words
> describes the same topic?
> 
> What level of experience/expertise will be needed to do this verification?
> Does the verify-er need to understand the product/component organization of
> bugzilla, understand Firefox source code, have programming experience?
> 
> Do you have an estimate of how long this task would take, and do you have a
> sample of the data you need reviewed and verified?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Emma Humphries
> Bugmaster
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:03 PM, <amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I am working on a research project on automatic detection of duplicate bug
> > report detection.
> > I am using the last 10 years of Mozilla bug reports(~750K) to do the ask
> > in order to make it easier triager by getting the duplicate bug report in
> > top-10.
> > The results look promising quantitatively and we want to publish the
> > result in a tier 1 conference.
> >
> > For the same, we need Mozilla's help. We have about 600 sets of 10-words
> > and we request Mozilla to help us do the quantitative evaluation on those.
> > Basically for each set of 10-words, someone will have to say whether these
> > words belong to the same topic.
> >
> > We would appreciate if Mozilla could help by asking its community to help
> > with the labeling.
> >
> > Hoping to hear back.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amar Budhiraja
> > Data Science and Analytics Centre
> > IIIT-Hyderabad
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
> > dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla
> >



On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 6:45:34 AM UTC+5:30, Emma Humphries wrote:
> Hi Amar,
> 
> Thanks for your inquiry. I'm CC'ing the Firefox community manager Mike Hoye
> on this in case he has volunteer resources available to help.
> 
> To clarify your request, do you want someone to verify if a group of words
> describes the same topic?
> 
> What level of experience/expertise will be needed to do this verification?
> Does the verify-er need to understand the product/component organization of
> bugzilla, understand Firefox source code, have programming experience?
> 
> Do you have an estimate of how long this task would take, and do you have a
> sample of the data you need reviewed and verified?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Emma Humphries
> Bugmaster
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:03 PM, <amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I am working on a research project on automatic detection of duplicate bug
> > report detection.
> > I am using the last 10 years of Mozilla bug reports(~750K) to do the ask
> > in order to make it easier triager by getting the duplicate bug report in
> > top-10.
> > The results look promising quantitatively and we want to publish the
> > result in a tier 1 conference.
> >
> > For the same, we need Mozilla's help. We have about 600 sets of 10-words
> > and we request Mozilla to help us do the quantitative evaluation on those.
> > Basically for each set of 10-words, someone will have to say whether these
> > words belong to the same topic.
> >
> > We would appreciate if Mozilla could help by asking its community to help
> > with the labeling.
> >
> > Hoping to hear back.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amar Budhiraja
> > Data Science and Analytics Centre
> > IIIT-Hyderabad
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
> > dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla
> >
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From dylan at mozilla.com  Sat Oct 15 03:28:58 2016
From: dylan at mozilla.com (Dylan Hardison)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 23:28:58 -0400
Subject: Regarding Duplicate Bug Report Detection in Bugzilla
In-Reply-To: <66ec6848-4cb2-4078-b11d-c9700dc6a452@googlegroups.com>
References: <66ec6848-4cb2-4078-b11d-c9700dc6a452@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <F9BE65C7-2042-4729-AB75-08279C7EB771@mozilla.com>


> On Oct 14, 2016, at 21:03, amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I am working on a research project on automatic detection of duplicate bug report detection. 
> I am using the last 10 years of Mozilla bug reports(~750K) to do the ask in order to make it easier triager by getting the duplicate bug report in top-10. 
> The results look promising quantitatively and we want to publish the result in a tier 1 conference.
> 
> For the same, we need Mozilla's help. We have about 600 sets of 10-words and we request Mozilla to help us do the quantitative evaluation on those. Basically for each set of 10-words, someone will have to say whether these words belong to the same topic. 
> 
> We would appreciate if Mozilla could help by asking its community to help with the labeling. 
> 
> Hoping to hear back.
> 

This is very interesting. How will the labeling work? Some online questionnaire / google form?
Let me know exactly what's expected and I'll see what I can do. If we can find 60 volunteers, that's only ten sets of ten words
each -- but I might be misunderstanding how you'd need to collect the answers
(and how you control for humans reporting incorrectly).

Kind regards,

Dylan Hardison.

From amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com  Sat Oct 15 09:44:43 2016
From: amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com (amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 02:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Regarding Duplicate Bug Report Detection in Bugzilla
In-Reply-To: <mailman.4585.1476502151.18164.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
References: <66ec6848-4cb2-4078-b11d-c9700dc6a452@googlegroups.com>
	<mailman.4585.1476502151.18164.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <e1131f77-53fc-436c-b57f-04b51eb85da2@googlegroups.com>

So, I think I will develop a web app/google form which will show you groups of words and then you are supposed to label if they belong to the same topic or not. 

Also, I was hoping to have each set labelled by say 3 (preferably 5 people)  in order to remove the diversity of human judgement.

If each user still does only 10 sets of 10-words each, I will minimally require 180 volunteers and ideally say 300 volunteers. I was hoping Mozilla's community size would help in there.

Thanks,
Amar


On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 8:59:17 AM UTC+5:30, Dylan Hardison wrote:
> > On Oct 14, 2016, at 21:03, amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > I am working on a research project on automatic detection of duplicate bug report detection. 
> > I am using the last 10 years of Mozilla bug reports(~750K) to do the ask in order to make it easier triager by getting the duplicate bug report in top-10. 
> > The results look promising quantitatively and we want to publish the result in a tier 1 conference.
> > 
> > For the same, we need Mozilla's help. We have about 600 sets of 10-words and we request Mozilla to help us do the quantitative evaluation on those. Basically for each set of 10-words, someone will have to say whether these words belong to the same topic. 
> > 
> > We would appreciate if Mozilla could help by asking its community to help with the labeling. 
> > 
> > Hoping to hear back.
> > 
> 
> This is very interesting. How will the labeling work? Some online questionnaire / google form?
> Let me know exactly what's expected and I'll see what I can do. If we can find 60 volunteers, that's only ten sets of ten words
> each -- but I might be misunderstanding how you'd need to collect the answers
> (and how you control for humans reporting incorrectly).
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Dylan Hardison.-
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <https://lists.bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org>
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com  Tue Oct 18 12:16:16 2016
From: amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com (amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 05:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Regarding Duplicate Bug Report Detection in Bugzilla
In-Reply-To: <66ec6848-4cb2-4078-b11d-c9700dc6a452@googlegroups.com>
References: <66ec6848-4cb2-4078-b11d-c9700dc6a452@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <2fcd18e8-24e6-4087-8c1f-ab537ad0da1c@googlegroups.com>

Hello,
I was wondering if there has been any update on this?

Thanks,
Amar



On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 6:33:10 AM UTC+5:30, amar.bu... at gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working on a research project on automatic detection of duplicate bug report detection. 
> I am using the last 10 years of Mozilla bug reports(~750K) to do the ask in order to make it easier triager by getting the duplicate bug report in top-10. 
> The results look promising quantitatively and we want to publish the result in a tier 1 conference.
> 
> For the same, we need Mozilla's help. We have about 600 sets of 10-words and we request Mozilla to help us do the quantitative evaluation on those. Basically for each set of 10-words, someone will have to say whether these words belong to the same topic. 
> 
> We would appreciate if Mozilla could help by asking its community to help with the labeling. 
> 
> Hoping to hear back.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amar Budhiraja
> Data Science and Analytics Centre
> IIIT-Hyderabad

_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From gerv at mozilla.org  Tue Oct 25 10:17:41 2016
From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:17:41 +0100
Subject: Bugzilla meeting tomorrow
Message-ID: <UPudnRnsIoLbrJLFnZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@mozilla.org>

The next monthly Bugzilla public meeting will be tomorrow, October 26th,
at 9pm UK time (1pm Pacific, 8pm UTC).
http://arewemeetingyet.com/London/2016-10-26/21:00/Bugzilla%20Meeting

Agenda is here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings

Feel free to add stuff you want to talk about, and see you then :-)

Gerv
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From gerv at mozilla.org  Wed Oct 26 10:53:41 2016
From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:53:41 +0100
Subject: Regarding Duplicate Bug Report Detection in Bugzilla
In-Reply-To: <2fcd18e8-24e6-4087-8c1f-ab537ad0da1c@googlegroups.com>
References: <66ec6848-4cb2-4078-b11d-c9700dc6a452@googlegroups.com>
	<2fcd18e8-24e6-4087-8c1f-ab537ad0da1c@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <fbe98c1f-2bdc-910a-4fac-fe65fd0e0d32@mozilla.org>

On 18/10/16 13:16, amar.budhiraja1 at gmail.com wrote:
>> We would appreciate if Mozilla could help by asking its community to help with the labeling. 

If you build the necessary web app for Mozillians to rate groups of
words, then perhaps Emma or someone else could put out a call for
volunteers for you. But you need to have something for them to do,
before we start trying to find people.

Gerv

_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From gerv at mozilla.org  Wed Oct 26 10:54:35 2016
From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:54:35 +0100
Subject: RFC pod2rst docs changes
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2894.1473210687.18165.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
References: <07d5295d-9f83-ed21-01ba-380cdbc63c84@redhat.com>
	<mailman.2894.1473210687.18165.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <41a5eb7c-426e-872c-0d08-9afe5478df46@mozilla.org>

On 07/09/16 02:11, Jeff Fearn wrote:
> A dingo ate my patch :(
> 
> https://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/bz5-docs-test/docs.patch

Hey Jeff,

I'm keen to make sure this doesn't get lost. Can you file a bug, attach
the patch and CC me? :-)

Gerv
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From jfearn at redhat.com  Wed Oct 26 10:58:44 2016
From: jfearn at redhat.com (Jeff Fearn)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:58:44 +1000
Subject: RFC pod2rst docs changes
In-Reply-To: <41a5eb7c-426e-872c-0d08-9afe5478df46@mozilla.org>
References: <07d5295d-9f83-ed21-01ba-380cdbc63c84@redhat.com>
 <mailman.2894.1473210687.18165.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
 <41a5eb7c-426e-872c-0d08-9afe5478df46@mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <a195f4de-1c78-fc11-f4a8-6d6a027873ba@redhat.com>

On 26/10/16 20:54, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 07/09/16 02:11, Jeff Fearn wrote:
>> A dingo ate my patch :(
>>
>> https://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/bz5-docs-test/docs.patch
> 
> Hey Jeff,
> 
> I'm keen to make sure this doesn't get lost. Can you file a bug, attach
> the patch and CC me? :-)

I'll open a bug. Matt fixed a bug with the links to CPAN modules so I'll
include that.

I'll just have to port it to master as it's done on our 5.0 branch.

Cheers, Jeff.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20161026/cd7838d5/attachment.sig>

From gerv at mozilla.org  Fri Oct 28 15:08:26 2016
From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:08:26 +0100
Subject: Bugzilla meeting tomorrow
In-Reply-To: <UPudnRnsIoLbrJLFnZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@mozilla.org>
References: <UPudnRnsIoLbrJLFnZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <nvWdnVkdS7x39I7FnZ2dnUU7-X-dnZ2d@mozilla.org>

On 25/10/16 11:17, Gervase Markham wrote:
> The next monthly Bugzilla public meeting will be tomorrow, October 26th,
> at 9pm UK time (1pm Pacific, 8pm UTC).
> http://arewemeetingyet.com/London/2016-10-26/21:00/Bugzilla%20Meeting

Minutes are here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings:2016-10-26

Gerv

_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla