How we use Git, part 2

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Tue Nov 25 14:30:01 UTC 2014


On 25/11/14 14:22, David Lawrence wrote:
> Sounds fine to me. I would even go a little further and name it bug-218917-gerv or
> feature-218917-gerv. For people who want to contribute that do not have checkin
> rights, there is always github as well and they can use similar naming there.

When would you choose "bug" and when "feature"? How is expressing that
distinction in the branch name useful? Or do you just think it reads better?

Gerv



More information about the developers mailing list