From justdave at bugzilla.org Tue Jun 3 20:51:24 2014 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (Dave Miller) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:51:24 -0400 Subject: Bugzilla on Facebook and Google+ Message-ID: <538E354C.9040208@bugzilla.org> At our last meeting (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings:2014-05-28) one of the action items was to have official pages on the social media sites rather than having independent communities in each, and attempt to redirect the support questions into our usual official support channels. It turns out our Google+ presence was already set up this way: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+bugzilla We've now set up a Facebook page at: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bugzilla/1427568330846442 There are two older pages on Facebook (one fan-created one, and one that was auto-generated from the Wikipedia entry). We need people to "vote" to tell Facebook that ours is the official one, so if you have a Facebook account: The Wikipedia auto-generated one: - https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bugzilla/109453039081539 - On this page select the "Edit" button at the top, then click "Add official page" and paste in the URL ending in 442 into the box. The fan-created one: - https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bugzilla/634017930022274 - On this page, select "Suggest an edit" then "Add official page" then paste the URL ending in 442 into the box. And of course don't forget to Like the real one at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bugzilla/1427568330846442 :) And just for completeness, we're also on Twitter: https://twitter.com/bugzilla and Linked In: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bugzilla-project -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ IT Infrastructure Engineer, Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From justdave at bugzilla.org Wed Jun 11 03:27:45 2014 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (Dave Miller) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:27:45 -0400 Subject: Simon is back Message-ID: <5397CCB1.9070404@bugzilla.org> Just so it doesn't catch anyone by surprise, Simon Green is back helping us out with the core project management again \o/ You may see him doing approvals on bugs again (looks like he got a few in before I mailed this already actually). -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ IT Infrastructure Engineer, Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From dkl at mozilla.com Thu Jun 26 16:49:23 2014 From: dkl at mozilla.com (David Lawrence) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:49:23 -0400 Subject: Get Started with Bugzilla Fast Using Docker Message-ID: <53AC4F13.7070603@mozilla.com> I have created a Docker image that allows you to get a Bugzilla instance up and running quickly as a container on your workstation. Docker is a new application that utilizes Linux containers to allow apps to run in their own virtual spaces. Please try it out and let me know how I can improve it to make it more useful. Full information here: https://dlawrence.wordpress.com/2014/06/25/get-started-with-bugzilla-fast-using-docker/ dkl -- David Lawrence dkl at mozilla.com From mcote at mozilla.com Fri Jun 27 02:20:54 2014 From: mcote at mozilla.com (=?UTF-8?B?TWFyayBDw7R0w6k=?=) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:20:54 -0400 Subject: Next triage party: 9 July 2014 14:00 UTC Message-ID: We had another successful Bugzilla triage session on June 4th. We got through another hundred bugs or so, and we've refined our process. We are now splitting bugs by component and then into chunks of 50 or fewer, sorted by bug ID. 50 is an arbitrary number, chosen to be an amount of bugs that, at minimum, one could reasonably triage in an hour, with full focus. Let's have another triage session 9 July 2014 at the same time, 14:00 UTC. There's an etherpad[1] that specifies all the chunks; sign up there to own one. If you're really keen, feel free to do a chunk at any time! Mark [1]: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/BugzillaTriage _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From damien.nozay at gmail.com Fri Jun 27 02:43:19 2014 From: damien.nozay at gmail.com (Damien) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:43:19 -0700 Subject: Change from Tinderbox to Travis CI for automated Bugzilla testing In-Reply-To: <537676C2.2070002@mozilla.com> References: <537676C2.2070002@mozilla.com> Message-ID: Hi, Kind of a late reply... but if some developers are forking the github project; then if you had pull requests enabled, you would be able to automagically test them with Travis CI and they would appear at [1]. Documentation for that is at [2]. This should make the review process tremendously easier. I know there are strong opinions against using the issue tracker from github, so let me just leave that as a "that's a possibility and it's available". [1] https://travis-ci.org/bugzilla/bugzilla/pull_requests [2] http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/pull-requests/ On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:36 PM, David Lawrence wrote: > Greetings > > For a month or so, I have been working on getting our automated Bugzilla > QA test suite up and running with the Travis > Continuous Integration system[1] (Travis CI for short). Up until now we > have been using Tinderbox[2] for performing our > automated testing. Mozilla WebOps have been wanting to decommission > Tinderbox for quite some time as the code base is no longer > maintained and Bugzilla[3] was the only project still actively using it. > > Travis CI has a free service option for open source projects which is > what we will be using for Bugzilla. It requires the code > to be located in github.com and since we now have a read-only mirror of > all Bugzilla branches to github.com, Travis CI became a > good option. Basically whenever a commit is made, Travis CI fires off > workers that will run the automated test suite and record > the results. All is required is a configuration file in the root directory > of the code. The file contains some basic information > such as programming language, how to get the test environment set up, etc. > > So starting now, Tinderbox will no longer be running our automated test > suite and we will instead using Travis CI[3]. Any > failures or changes in the testing status will be announced in the IRC > channels #bugzilla and #qa-bugzilla. We will be working > on improving our test coverage as well as enabling tests for the master > Bugzilla branch which we have not done up until now. > If you have any questions, feel free to email or ping me on IRC in > #bugzilla. > > Thanks > David Lawrence > Bugzilla Release Manager > > [1] https://travis-ci.org > [2] http://www-archive.mozilla.org/projects/tinderbox/ > [3] https://travis-ci.org/bugzilla/bugzilla > > -- > David Lawrence > dkl at mozilla.com > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From damien.nozay at gmail.com Fri Jun 27 02:58:58 2014 From: damien.nozay at gmail.com (Damien) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:58:58 -0700 Subject: Tests using SQLite In-Reply-To: <6JydnRXK7JeqaoPOnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@mozilla.org> References: <6JydnRXK7JeqaoPOnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@mozilla.org> Message-ID: Hi Gerv, sorry for a late reply. If we were talking django instead of perl, I would tell you that there are subtle differences between sqlite, oracle, postgres and mysql; one notable issue being foreign key constraints [1]. >From memory, I have seen in the code some raw SQL and prepared statements; if you are confident those are portable between sql vendors, yes sqlite should be a good option. Another common pattern I've seen is to just create a database whose name is prefixed with "test_". This should take care of not damaging the user's actual database. thanks, damien [1] http://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > This idea has been running around my head for a bit... > > Now that Bugzilla has SQLite support, can we use it for writing tests > which require a database? We could make a simple-ish test database as an > SQLite file, and then it would be possible to run read and even write > tests without damaging the user's real installation. The DB could be > reset after each test using source control commands. > > This wouldn't have been nearly so easy with e.g. MySQL, but is with SQLite. > > Is this a good idea? > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list > dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From gerv at mozilla.org Fri Jun 27 13:44:54 2014 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:44:54 +0100 Subject: Get Started with Bugzilla Fast Using Docker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 26/06/14 17:49, David Lawrence wrote: > I have created a Docker image that allows you to get a Bugzilla instance up and running > quickly as a container on your workstation. Docker is a new application that utilizes > Linux containers to allow apps to run in their own virtual spaces. > > Please try it out and let me know how I can improve it to make it more useful. As I commented on dkl's blog: this is awesome, but Docker requires a 64-bit OS. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From spamsux at forgetit.org Fri Jun 27 18:19:59 2014 From: spamsux at forgetit.org (Steve Wendt) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:19:59 -0700 Subject: Get Started with Bugzilla Fast Using Docker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 6/27/2014 6:44 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > this is awesome, but Docker requires a 64-bit OS. Why would anyone run a Linux server that wasn't 64-bit? _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From gerv at mozilla.org Mon Jun 30 12:58:35 2014 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:58:35 +0100 Subject: Get Started with Bugzilla Fast Using Docker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53B15EFB.6070007@mozilla.org> On 27/06/14 19:19, Steve Wendt wrote: > On 6/27/2014 6:44 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > >> this is awesome, but Docker requires a 64-bit OS. > > Why would anyone run a Linux server that wasn't 64-bit? My desktop, on which I wanted to use this to develop Bugzilla, doesn't run 64-bit Ubuntu. Exactly why I didn't use it, I'm not sure. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From gerv at mozilla.org Mon Jun 30 14:45:04 2014 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:45:04 +0100 Subject: Missing Docs Hackers Message-ID: Hi Bugzilla team, I'm doing fairly well on tracking down docs contributors. And many of those left haven't made very many contributions. But there are four who have, and so not having them would be more work. Does anyone know of any way of establishing contact with any of the following people? Does anyone have the ability to send InMail on LinkedIn? 1) Karl Kornel / Website is blank. Whois shows nothing useful. Bugzilla account uses second address. Last Bugzilla activity 2006. Seems to be @californiakarl . Tweeted at him on 2016-06-16 and 2016-06-27, but he may not see my tweets as we don't have a relationship on Twitter. Also https://www.linkedin.com/in/akkornel - was at Mindspeed until March this year. 2014-06-27 - tried connecting on LinkedIn. No response yet. 2) Matthew Tuck / Bugzilla account still uses 2nd address. No activity since 2011. Is https://www.linkedin.com/pub/matthew-tuck/28/66b/884 , Made connect request 2016-06-16. http://internote.sourceforge.net/contact.php says still using 2nd address. Also AMO profile. Repinged by email 2014-06-27. 3) Shane H. W. Travis / Bugzilla account still uses 2nd address. No activity since 2005. Tried calling SED Systems - he no longer works there. Searching for his name doesn't turn up much. Not on LinkedIn as far as I can see. 4) victory(_RSZ_) / rsz.jp is NO HOST so none of these addresses will work. BMO email is not read. No activity since 2007. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mhoye at mozilla.com Mon Jun 30 14:48:20 2014 From: mhoye at mozilla.com (Mike Hoye) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:48:20 -0400 Subject: Missing Docs Hackers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53B178B4.8050407@mozilla.com> On 2014-06-30 10:45 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > Tweeted at him on 2016-06-16 and > 2016-06-27, but he may not see my tweets as we don't have a relationship > on Twitter. Also, he may not be a timelord. - mhoye _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From gerv at mozilla.org Mon Jun 30 14:51:39 2014 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:51:39 +0100 Subject: Missing Docs Hackers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53B1797B.30003@mozilla.org> On 30/06/14 15:48, Mike Hoye wrote: > Also, he may not be a timelord. Hmm. Indeed not. I'll use the Tardis to go back and resend the same tweets on the same dates in 2014. Nope, still no response as of now. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mhoye at mozilla.com Mon Jun 30 15:10:01 2014 From: mhoye at mozilla.com (Mike Hoye) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:10:01 -0400 Subject: Missing Docs Hackers In-Reply-To: <53B1797B.30003@mozilla.org> References: <53B1797B.30003@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <53B17DC9.1030307@mozilla.com> On 2014-06-30 10:51 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 30/06/14 15:48, Mike Hoye wrote: >> Also, he may not be a timelord. > Hmm. Indeed not. I'll use the Tardis to go back and resend the same > tweets on the same dates in 2014. In all seriousness, though, if we ever find out that a Mozilla contributor is also a timelord, we should really work hard at maintaining that relationship. - mhoye _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla