Old Discussion: Python Implementation? (Bugzilla:Languages)
sgreen at redhat.com
Wed May 1 00:42:43 UTC 2013
On 01/05/13 09:52, lindsay wrote:
> Perl 5 cannot be maintained for another 20 years.
Says who? Perl 5 is still actively developed and maintained, just as
much as any other modern development language.
> If your plan for Bugzilla's progress is to have Bugzilla communicate via
> RESTful interfaces (or whatever replaces REST), then yes, the codebase
> inside those interfaces can be with us for a great many years.
Enhance Bugzilla WebServices to allow data access using REST
> If your plan
> for progress involves a fair bit of extension to the core codebase, then a
> plugins structure would be a good investment. Python has a good story when
> it comes to plugins.
Bugzilla's extension framework is not great, but it is pretty good. It
does about 80% of what bugzilla.redhat.com (which I help maintain) needs
it to do.
> So I think that's the issue. Is the core stable/done, or will it grow
> significantly ?
It definitely is not 'done'. There are 2,353 open bugs in the upstream
project, and while all of them probably won't be implemented, a lot of
them will be.
In all honesty, I think porting Bugzilla to another language is a bad
idea. Bugzilla is 14½ years old now. I'm sure writing a new bug tracking
system from scratch (with a converter of course), is going to be better
than trying to keep up with the constant changes of the Bugzilla code base.
This of course, is no small task.
Red Hat Asia Pacific Pty Ltd
More information about the developers