Invalid statuses in search now ignored rather than honoured?

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

On 09/28/2010 04:20 PM, Frédéric Buclin wrote:
> How can this be intentional? If the date is invalid, we should throw an
> error. What 4.0 does is the correct behavior.

	Oh, I thought that Gerv was saying that the old system *didn't* throw
errors and the new one does.

	You are right, we should most likely throw errors about invalid dates.
You're welcome to file bugs about all of these things (although they
will probably be caught during refactoring anyhow).

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.