Close 324235?

Max Kanat-Alexander mkanat at
Sun Mar 21 17:53:00 UTC 2010

On 03/21/2010 10:40 AM, Eric Olson wrote:
> I realize this is fairly trivial, but should 324235 be closed? It
> involves a parameter that doesn't exist in the 3.x branch anymore. Or is
> it appropriate to keep bugs open for branches no longer supported?

	For a bug that's trivial like that, it should be closed if we did in
fact remove that parameter in a later release.

Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.

More information about the developers mailing list