Including and excluding fields

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

On 01/14/2010 10:09 PM, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> 	If you do stick with this, I'd use "_default" instead of "all", though,
> since I'd interpret all to mean "every single field possible".

	Oh, and you may also want a "_custom", which means "every custom
field", for consumers who want only certain built-in fields, but who
might not know what custom fields are available and want all of them.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.