Including and excluding fields
mkanat at bugzilla.org
Fri Jan 15 06:11:18 UTC 2010
On 01/14/2010 10:09 PM, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> If you do stick with this, I'd use "_default" instead of "all", though,
> since I'd interpret all to mean "every single field possible".
Oh, and you may also want a "_custom", which means "every custom
field", for consumers who want only certain built-in fields, but who
might not know what custom fields are available and want all of them.
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.
More information about the developers