Including and excluding fields

Max Kanat-Alexander mkanat at
Fri Jan 15 06:11:18 UTC 2010

On 01/14/2010 10:09 PM, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> 	If you do stick with this, I'd use "_default" instead of "all", though,
> since I'd interpret all to mean "every single field possible".

	Oh, and you may also want a "_custom", which means "every custom
field", for consumers who want only certain built-in fields, but who
might not know what custom fields are available and want all of them.

Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.

More information about the developers mailing list