API Design Questions (2)

Max Kanat-Alexander mkanat at bugzilla.org
Thu Sep 24 10:31:54 UTC 2009

On 09/24/2009 03:14 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> and have that do the obvious, simple thing. But if absence of a field
> means something, then that breaks. This would mean you'd always have to
> GET every bug before PUTting it, even if you had most of a
> representation of that bug from the call which lists bugs.

	Oh, you mean that you want some way to reset things to the default when
updating bugs! Just set them null as opposed to an empty string.

Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.

More information about the developers mailing list