From eblack at higherone.com  Fri May  1 13:56:47 2009
From: eblack at higherone.com (Eric Black)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:56:47 -0400
Subject: Modifications offering
In-Reply-To: <7901A535B99ED848BAC76AE67185C5AF0113EF335752@msk-exch1.sw.swsoft.com>
References: <7901A535B99ED848BAC76AE67185C5AF0113EF335752@msk-exch1.sw.swsoft.com>
Message-ID: <4F91EB003F5C784084736E717AB5AFCA43DDF8BA@mail02.higherone.com>

I'm definitely interested in them, so if there is no bugs for these patches, could you send them to me?

Thanks
Eric
________________________________________
From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org [developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Shvetsov [alexsh at parallels.com]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 9:52 AM
To: developers at bugzilla.org
Subject: Modifications offering

Hi All,

I've just finished some Bugzilla customizations, and would like to offer them to community.

So, step-by-step:
1. "bug-start_of_update" and "bug-start_of_create" hook entry points:
    That is just useful for limiting modification and creation of bugs;
2. Milestones obsoleting:
    I have completely implemented this feature, so it allows to:
    a. Hide obsolete milestones for bugs creation;
    b. Hide obsolete milestones (except current one) for bugs modification;
    c. Highlight with light gray obsolete milestones in Advanced Search.
3. Custom fields targeting:
    This modification allows to specify products for which custom fields are created,
    and perform product-based targeting of custom fields values.

All modifications are fully integrated with admin panel. So if you are interested
in such features, please let me know J.

Regards,
Alexander Shvetsov-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=eblack at higherone.com>


From ghendricks at novell.com  Fri May  1 15:18:52 2009
From: ghendricks at novell.com (Gregary Hendricks)
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:18:52 -0600
Subject: Modifications offering
In-Reply-To: <7901A535B99ED848BAC76AE67185C5AF0113EF335752@msk-exch1.sw.swsoft.com>
References:  <7901A535B99ED848BAC76AE67185C5AF0113EF335752@msk-exch1.sw.swsoft.com>
Message-ID: <49FABE7C020000D20004756A@lucius.provo.novell.com>

>>> On 4/24/2009 at 07:52 AM, in message
<7901A535B99ED848BAC76AE67185C5AF0113EF335752 at msk-exch1.sw.swsoft.com>,
Alexander Shvetsov <alexsh at parallels.com> wrote: 
> Hi All, 
>  
> I've just finished some Bugzilla customizations, and would like to offer  
> them to community. 
>  
> So, step-by-step: 
> 1. "bug-start_of_update" and "bug-start_of_create" hook entry points: 
>     That is just useful for limiting modification and creation of bugs; 
> 2. Milestones obsoleting: 
>     I have completely implemented this feature, so it allows to: 
>     a. Hide obsolete milestones for bugs creation; 
>     b. Hide obsolete milestones (except current one) for bugs modification; 
>     c. Highlight with light gray obsolete milestones in Advanced Search. 
> 3. Custom fields targeting: 
>     This modification allows to specify products for which custom fields are  
> created, 
>     and perform product-based targeting of custom fields values. 
>  
> All modifications are fully integrated with admin panel. So if you are  
> interested 
> in such features, please let me know J. 

Best thing to do is enter bugs for each of these. Search first to see if you find one that has already been added. The milestone change seems to be part of bug 77193 for example. Then break your changes into patches as described at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Developers and attach them to the bug you created or identified. Then request review from the appropriate reviewer.

Greg



From eblack at higherone.com  Tue May  5 13:47:37 2009
From: eblack at higherone.com (Eric Black)
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:47:37 -0400
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <4F91EB003F5C784084736E717AB5AFCA43DDF8BF@mail02.higherone.com>

Hi,

I've been working on the CVS/Bugzilla integration with CVS version 1.12. I found this program on CPAN:

http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DW/DWHEELER/activitymail/activitymail-1.26

which seems to be more up-to-date than the other solutions I found. It's been around for some time and 
I was surprised it wasn't mentioned on the wiki page: 

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Addons#Integration_with_Source_Code_Management_programs

I'm not sure if this is where I should send this info, if it's not let me know.

Thanks,
Eric

From nicolas.doye at ericsson.com  Wed May  6 08:30:46 2009
From: nicolas.doye at ericsson.com (Nicolas Doye)
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:30:46 +0200
Subject: Security Alert. Miscreants trying to hack their way into CVS or just mailing lists?
Message-ID: <806C4B8940785A47B984FC8B6028025FFBD46C@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>

Off-topic, and apologies.
 
Would whoever looks after security at bugzilla.org (Majordomo and maybe
CVS) please contact me - as someone has tried to (ab)use my personal
e-mail address to register on cvs-checkins at bugzilla.org and now 
developers at bugzilla.org.
 
Maybe they just want to harvest e-mail addresses, but I'm worried they
might want to purport to be me (or any other previous list subscriber)
and try to get a dodgy patch accepted.
 
Brief summary: cvs-checkins attempt  at Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:09:16 -0700
(PDT) and developers attempt at Tue,  5 May 2009 22:48:02 -0700 (PDT).
e-mail address attempted to register at: nic _at_ worldofnic _dot_ org

Cheers,
nic

 

 

 

Nicolas Doye  
Senior Reporting Systems Engineer

Engineering and Design

 

Ericsson Ltd.

Services & Multimedia
Great Brighams Mead, Vastern Road

Reading RG1 8DJ United Kingdom
www.ericsson.com








This communication is confidential and intended solely for the
addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in
error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and
delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you.

E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption,
interception, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only
send and receive emails on the basis that we are not liable for any such
corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any
consequences thereof.

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20090506/b512e989/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: email_logo.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2015 bytes
Desc: email_logo.gif
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20090506/b512e989/attachment.gif>

From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Thu May  7 22:44:56 2009
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:44:56 -0700
Subject: Bugzilla 3.6: Consistency, Completeness, and Usability
Message-ID: <4A036468.9010808@bugzilla.org>

	Okay, so I have a somewhat-radical proposal to make for Bugzilla 3.6, 
that I've talked to LpSolit and a few of the other reviewers about 
already, and it's this:

	No new features for Bugzilla 3.6. Instead, we focus on fixing the 
features we already have.

	This means that we fix all the major HCI (usability) issues in 
Bugzilla. We finish any incomplete features that we have (so adding 
enhancements that actually just complete existing features is fine), and 
we make Bugzilla behave in a universally consistent fashion.

	There is work for everybody in this scheme! Refactoring the backend for 
consistency is something we can work on. Fixing the frontend is good. 
Updating documentation to actually be in sync with Bugzilla--that's 
another good thing. Completing features that you have worked on in the 
past would be another good item. There's something for everybody, 
believe me.

	The highest-priority items would be all the usability issues discovered 
by pryzak's students, as tracked at this bug:

	https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=bz-hci2008

	Examples of "completing a feature" would be: adding defaults to custom 
fields, allowing multi-select custom fields to show up in the bug list, 
indicating the sort order of a bug list, allowing email_in to accept 
attachments, the ability to disable certain field values, finishing the 
functionality of the "see also" field so that it's more useful--the 
sorts of things that were "always in the plan" and that everybody 
actually wants, but that we somehow never got around to.

	"Fixing" a feature would be things like: allowing the patch viewer to 
use other VCSes than CVS, because nobody uses CVS anymore, making the 
way extensions and template hooks work to be more consistent, etc.

	I've tagged some bugs that I think would be good to work on as part of 
this plan with [3.6 Focus] in the whiteboard. Here is a URL to these bugs:

	http://tr.im/36focus

	Note that I'm more interested in fixing things that actually affect UI 
users at this point more than I am interested in fixing or completing 
APIs, though some of that could possibly be done too.

	I came up with this plan because I am absolutely tired of hearing 
people complain about Bugzilla (try a daily Twitter search for 
"Bugzilla" and see what you get), I think that we're racking up 
incomplete features faster than we can complete them, and we're adding 
new incomplete UIs faster than we can fix them. We already have more 
features than any other bug tracker in the world--now we should make 
them *nice*.

	Feel free to tag some bugs as [3.6 Focus] yourself. If you're not sure 
that a bug would qualify, just ask me. Basically, any long-term "wow 
this is an annoying and enormous problem" bug would be qualified.

	Also, to be clear, I'm not going to forbid anybody to work on a whole 
new feature. You're still welcome to do that. I'm just saying what I'd 
like our *priorities* to be as reviewers and developers.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.


From arbingersys at gmail.com  Fri May  8 19:08:12 2009
From: arbingersys at gmail.com (JA Robson)
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:08:12 -0600
Subject: Bugzilla::WebService::Bug - where is the datetime_format() sub?
Message-ID: <1dde14e00905081208r3b1735a6yb94fb1e04e95492d@mail.gmail.com>

Hi, I'm trying out the web services demo script, and I've discovered
something I can't quite figure out.

I tried the following:

./contrib/bz_webservice_demo.pl --uri
http://localhost/bugzilla/xmlrpc.cgi --bug_id=4

and get:

Connecting to a Bugzilla of version 3.5.
Bugzilla's timezone is -0600.
-32000 Can't locate object method "datetime_format" via package
"Bugzilla::WebService::Bug" at Bugzilla/WebService.pm line 39.
 in SOAP call near ./contrib/bz_webservice_demo.pl line 272.

I've ack'ed the source, tried to locate a module that this sub is
magically being inherited from, but have found nothing. If you comment
out line 39 below from WebService.pm, things work.

 36 sub type {
 37     my ($self, $type, $value) = @_;
 38     if ($type eq 'dateTime') {
 39         $value = $self->datetime_format($value);
 40     }
 41     return XMLRPC::Data->type($type)->value($value);
 42 }

So where is datetime_format()? What am I missing?

Thanks, James


From lpsolit at gmail.com  Sat May  9 11:58:01 2009
From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=)
Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 13:58:01 +0200
Subject: Bugzilla::WebService::Bug - where is the datetime_format() sub?
In-Reply-To: <1dde14e00905081208r3b1735a6yb94fb1e04e95492d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1dde14e00905081208r3b1735a6yb94fb1e04e95492d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A056FC9.3000809@gmail.com>

Le 08. 05. 09 21:08, JA Robson a ?crit :
> So where is datetime_format()? What am I missing?

The patch is ready for checkin since April 29. mkanat didn't commit it 
yet for some unknown reason. The patch is available from here:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490673

The direct link to the patch is:

https://bug490673.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=375083


Max, check in your patch asap, please.

LpSolit


From gerv at mozilla.org  Wed May 13 08:47:50 2009
From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham)
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:47:50 +0100
Subject: Bugzilla 3.6: Consistency, Completeness, and Usability
In-Reply-To: <mailman.50.1241736325.32691.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
References: <mailman.50.1241736325.32691.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <y7udnQgXxsaqFJfXnZ2dnUVZ_gxi4p2d@mozilla.org>

On 07/05/09 23:44, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> No new features for Bugzilla 3.6. Instead, we focus on fixing the
> features we already have.

Is there a tentative release time for 3.6? That is to say, how long do 
you suggest the project is focussed only on fixes?

Will this policy have any effect on the acceptability of, or speed of 
reviewing, external contributions from potential new community members?

Gerv
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From cloudnine43 at hotmail.com  Fri May 15 16:24:14 2009
From: cloudnine43 at hotmail.com (HECTOR LOPEZ)
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:24:14 -0600
Subject: herbavigor
Message-ID: <BYednTGaGcipCpDXnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@mozilla.org>

party pills, legal highs www.herbavigor.com 
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From cloudnine43 at hotmail.com  Fri May 15 16:24:59 2009
From: cloudnine43 at hotmail.com (HECTOR LOPEZ)
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:24:59 -0600
Subject: smartshop
Message-ID: <zPadnX9XUc__CpDXnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@mozilla.org>

live www.herbavigor.com 
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From vitaly.fedrushkov at gmail.com  Fri May 22 08:25:42 2009
From: vitaly.fedrushkov at gmail.com (SnowyOwl)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Moving To Catalyst, Incrementally?
References: <mailman.570.1240952279.28721.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <2d488746-1923-4808-afe2-80278e3650ec@s12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>

On Apr 29, 2:57?am, Max Kanat-Alexander <mka... at bugzilla.org> wrote:
> ? ? ? ? The advantages of running under Catalyst would be:

 * Catalyst is already Maketext-capable so we may separate natural
   language layer and use available PO tools instead of hand-writing
   localized template sets.  This would increase number of active
   localizations and perhaps reduce localizers' maintenance workload.

What about Template Toolkit?  Is Catalyst a worthy replacement, and do
we plan to (slowly) move there?

  Regards,
  Vitaly.
_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Fri May 22 10:39:59 2009
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 03:39:59 -0700
Subject: Moving To Catalyst, Incrementally?
In-Reply-To: <2d488746-1923-4808-afe2-80278e3650ec@s12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
References: <mailman.570.1240952279.28721.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org> <2d488746-1923-4808-afe2-80278e3650ec@s12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <4A1680FF.6080006@bugzilla.org>

SnowyOwl wrote:
> What about Template Toolkit?  Is Catalyst a worthy replacement, and do
> we plan to (slowly) move there?

	Well, Catalyst isn't a templating language, it's a web development 
framework, and it actually supports Template Toolkit (and in fact uses 
it by default, I believe). Does that answer your question?

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.


From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Fri May 22 22:52:01 2009
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:52:01 -0700
Subject: Bugzilla Plugin for Supybot Has a Home
Message-ID: <4A172C91.9090205@bugzilla.org>

	I just created a Google Code page for the Supybot Bugzilla plugin (what 
bugbot is using to report changes):

	http://code.google.com/p/supybot-bugzilla/

	You can use that to get the code and to report issues about it.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.


From aaron.trevena at gmail.com  Wed May 27 15:08:33 2009
From: aaron.trevena at gmail.com (Aaron Trevena)
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:08:33 +0100
Subject: Moving To Catalyst, Incrementally?
In-Reply-To: <49F7732F.4020301@bugzilla.org>
References: <20090428171858.CGF60977@ms17.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
	 <49F7732F.4020301@bugzilla.org>
Message-ID: <edcafa7d0905270808i6c86b078g3b0ab9cebcf80ec2@mail.gmail.com>

2009/4/28 Max Kanat-Alexander <mkanat at bugzilla.org>:
>    Hey Mark. We won't be re-writing the whole thing. That's what
> "incrementally" means--not re-writing the whole thing.

A good starting point would be to move the db layer to DBIx::Class and
custom queries to SQL::Abstract.

As I said last time I posted to this list, doing so would gain you
considerably more maintainable queries, and pagination almost for
free.

You won't get dbix-class totally for free with catalyst, it's helpers
will create data class files, but I'm pretty sure that the bugzilla
schema doesn't fit nicely into any ORM generated code without manually
specifying some relationships. etc - however that should be very
simple.

I may be remembering wrong, but I don't remember seeing any unit tests
in bugzilla last time I looked, if you're going to be doing any
refactoring like this they're essential.

Cheers,

A.

-- 
http://www.aarontrevena.co.uk
LAMP System Integration, Development and Hosting


From bugzilla-org.ralph-schuster.eu at lists.mozilla.org  Thu May 28 09:43:22 2009
From: bugzilla-org.ralph-schuster.eu at lists.mozilla.org (Ralph Schuster)
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 11:43:22 +0200
Subject: Privacy feature
Message-ID: <dKOdnTF2W-RQwYPXnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@mozilla.org>

Hi folks,

I noticed that Bugzilla still doesn't seem to have any possibility to
hide email addresses (am I wrong?). So I fixed V3.2.3 for my own 
installation to introduce
real login names along with associated email addresses.

My questions:

1) Is there such a change planned for future releases (I cannot see so far)
2) How can I contribute my changes back into Bugzilla on that issue?

Thanks in advance ;)

Ralph 


_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


From lpsolit at gmail.com  Thu May 28 11:02:52 2009
From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=)
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:02:52 +0200
Subject: Privacy feature
In-Reply-To: <dKOdnTF2W-RQwYPXnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@mozilla.org>
References: <dKOdnTF2W-RQwYPXnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <4A1E6F5C.3090104@gmail.com>

Le 28. 05. 09 11:43, Ralph Schuster a ?crit :
> 1) Is there such a change planned for future releases (I cannot see so far)
> 2) How can I contribute my changes back into Bugzilla on that issue?

1) + 2): There are bugs to implement this already: 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218917

The best way to contribute is to attach patches to the appropritate bugs.

Note that Bugzilla 3.4 no longer displays email addresses if you are not 
logged in. This is a first step in the complete email address privacy.

LpSolit


From nbezzala at yahoo.com  Sat May 30 11:17:57 2009
From: nbezzala at yahoo.com (Nitish Bezzala)
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 04:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: template hook doesn't work
In-Reply-To: <4A1680FF.6080006@bugzilla.org>
References: <mailman.570.1240952279.28721.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org> <2d488746-1923-4808-afe2-80278e3650ec@s12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <4A1680FF.6080006@bugzilla.org>
Message-ID: <232522.97762.qm@web110813.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

In template/en/default/bug/create/create.html.tmpl, I added a hook 
[% Hook.process("url") %]
 
Then I created a file with just the text "hello" and saved it in 
extensions/url/template/en/default/bug/create/create-url.html.tmpl

But I don't get hello in place of the hook when I open the Create Bug page. I ran checksetup.pl. 
Is there anything else I should be doing?

Is a code hook needed before I can get a template hook to work?


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20090530/7790077c/attachment.html>

From sting606 at gmail.com  Sat May 30 11:32:10 2009
From: sting606 at gmail.com (yakoub 2)
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:32:10 +0300
Subject: template hook doesn't work
In-Reply-To: <232522.97762.qm@web110813.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <mailman.570.1240952279.28721.dev-apps-bugzilla@lists.mozilla.org>
 <2d488746-1923-4808-afe2-80278e3650ec@s12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <4A1680FF.6080006@bugzilla.org> <232522.97762.qm@web110813.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4A21193A.5050203@gmail.com>

use path extensions/url/template/en/bug/create/create-url.html.tmpl
no /default/ in path

Nitish Bezzala wrote:
> In template/en/default/bug/create/create.html.tmpl, I added a hook
> [% Hook.process("url") %]
>  
> Then I created a file with just the text "hello" and saved it in
> extensions/url/template/en/default/bug/create/create-url.html.tmpl
>
> But I don't get hello in place of the hook when I open the Create Bug 
> page. I ran checksetup.pl.
> Is there anything else I should be doing?
>
> Is a code hook needed before I can get a template hook to work?
>
>
>
>