Moving To Catalyst, Incrementally?

[Guy Pyrzak]

I like frameworks they make me happy. However, one thing that I'd want to
ensure is that the framework has little to no effect on performance. I think
if we can ensure that, it would be great to have a framework.

-Guy

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Max Kanat-Alexander <mkanat at bugzilla.org>wrote:

> m.roth2006 at rcn.com wrote:
>
>>   Before you go rewriting the whole thing... last week I posted that I had
>> a couple of enhancements, one of which required no code changes, that one
>> being able to handle HTML email, and the other will allow attachments via
>> email. I'd like to submit them, but have had a deafening silence as to where
>> to take them.
>>
>
>        Hey Mark. We won't be re-writing the whole thing. That's what
> "incrementally" means--not re-writing the whole thing. Also, this doesn't
> really have to do with this thread. However, just read our development
> process and post your patches on the appropriate bugs, which already exist.
> (Our development process is at http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Developers)
>
>        -Max
> --
> http://www.everythingsolved.com/
> Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=guy.pyrzak@gmail.com>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20090428/96e121e3/attachment.html>