Installation usability testing

Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 11:30:41 UTC 2009


Le 06. 04. 09 12:16, Gervase Markham a écrit :
 > not necessary to make sure a doc compiles. A rule that "the docs must
 > compile and all the tests run" would still make updates far more
 > friction-free than the current system.

Except that almost nobody compiles the doc besides Colin, me and a few 
other reviewers. Many contributors have no working installation 
(doc-related, due to dependencies to compile them). Colin has plans to 
make things simpler, but I didn't hear from him for a long time. Colin?


 > I would anticipate that when we shipped a release, we could export the
 > current version of the wiki to a static version.

That's not ideal, IMO. And someone would have to check all contributions 
to make sure someone is not adding some stupid stuff in it.


 > OK, but what about my major point? Loads of people have installed
 > Bugzilla over the past 18 months, and not one of them has done this. Why
 > not?

Because people don't care too much about updating the doc as soon as 
they understood how Bugzilla works, IMHO. We have a lot of stuff on Wiki 
now, and the number of contributions is not larger than for the doc in 
CVS, I think (based on pages I watch).

LpSolit

_______________________________________________
dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list
dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla


More information about the developers mailing list