From gerv at mozilla.org Fri Nov 7 18:10:02 2008 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:10:02 +0000 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? Message-ID: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> I don't suppose there's a copy of the Bugzilla documentation in a wiki somewhere? If so, we could use the new clause of the GNU FDL to relicense it under Creative Commons BY-SA, which seems to be what most people are using these days for copyleft docs and so provides best compatibility with other works... http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html But if there wasn't a copy in a wiki somewhere on November 1st, we can't :-( I don't think CVS counts as an "MMC Site", because it's not true that anybody can edit it. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From lpsolit at gmail.com Fri Nov 7 18:14:04 2008 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:14:04 +0100 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <4914856C.6060606@gmail.com> Gervase Markham a ?crit : > I don't suppose there's a copy of the Bugzilla documentation in a wiki > somewhere? All we have on wiki is https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla But that's completely separate documentation from our "official" one. LpSolit From justdave at bugzilla.org Fri Nov 7 18:38:11 2008 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:38:11 -0500 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <49148B13.3060401@bugzilla.org> Gervase Markham wrote on 11/7/08 1:10 PM: > I don't suppose there's a copy of the Bugzilla documentation in a wiki > somewhere? > > If so, we could use the new clause of the GNU FDL to relicense it under > Creative Commons BY-SA, which seems to be what most people are using > these days for copyleft docs and so provides best compatibility with > other works... > http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html > > But if there wasn't a copy in a wiki somewhere on November 1st, we can't > :-( I don't think CVS counts as an "MMC Site", because it's not true > that anybody can edit it. How much effort would it be to relicense by authors' permissions? I have written permission from Matthew Barnson to relicense anything written by him as I see fit (obtained the last time we were discussing relicensing it, that we never got around to doing) and he contributed a major portion of the original docs. You, Vlad, Travis, and Colin are probably the other major contributors (though I haven't looked, I'm just pulling names out of the air). How may contributors would we have to get permission from to do the relicense the old-fashioned way? :) -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From justdave at bugzilla.org Fri Nov 7 18:40:01 2008 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:40:01 -0500 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <49148B81.4050603@bugzilla.org> Gervase Markham wrote on 11/7/08 1:10 PM: > I don't suppose there's a copy of the Bugzilla documentation in a wiki > somewhere? The chapter that contains the FAQ was moved into the wiki a year or two ago. The rest of the docs I don't think were. -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From after.fallout at gmail.com Tue Nov 11 17:37:12 2008 From: after.fallout at gmail.com (Bill Barry) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:37:12 -0700 Subject: bad formatting when entering a comment from firefox 3 Message-ID: <4919C2C8.80603@gmail.com> Has anybody else noticed this or is this something possibly wrong with our particular build (some CVS trunk revision from sometime, it identifies as 3.3)? When entering a comment with a large paragraph worth of text, Firefox 3 seems to insert newlines at the end of every line before submitting the text to the bugzilla server. The server then splits every line at the last word before X chars (I don't remember the exact number), resulting in a comment that looks like the sample at the end. My questions are: 1. Has anybody else noticed this? 2. Is there anything I can do about it? 3. Is there a bug in bmo somewhere for it? 4. Is it getting fixed for the next version of Firefox (I haven't tested it in other browsers, the only one I noticed the problem in is Firefox though)? 5. If it is a known issue, was there already a patch to work around it in Bugzilla (it doesn't seem to be happening on landfill)? Sample comment: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Quisque dapibus facilisis mi. Aliquam dignissim, lorem quis ultrices vulputate, felis lacus mollis sem, ac sagittis ligula eros vel lorem. Nulla ornare elementum ante. Pellentesque quis lectus. Maecenas convallis. Proin placerat. Nullam dui orci, posuere non, malesuada eu, ullamcorper ac, mauris. Donec molestie interdum risus. Nunc iaculis vestibulum magna. Maecenas nec dui. Nullam suscipit nisi nec eros. Vestibulum risus eros, volutpat eu, dictum vel, pharetra non, tortor. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Morbi eleifend consequat risus. Quisque mauris. Quisque ac sapien. Curabitur rutrum. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Donec purus dolor, rhoncus eu, sollicitudin vitae, condimentum vulputate, eros. From mkanat at bugzilla.org Wed Nov 12 01:37:48 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:37:48 -0800 Subject: bad formatting when entering a comment from firefox 3 In-Reply-To: <4919C2C8.80603@gmail.com> References: <4919C2C8.80603@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081111173748.1c2e0d9c@es-compy> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:37:12 -0700 Bill Barry wrote: > When entering a comment with a large paragraph worth of text, Firefox > 3 seems to insert newlines at the end of every line before submitting > the text to the bugzilla server. No, not unless you've customized Bugzilla. Also, this question would *probably* be more appropriate for the support-bugzilla list. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From wurblzap at gmail.com Wed Nov 12 09:39:18 2008 From: wurblzap at gmail.com (Marc Schumann) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:39:18 +0100 Subject: bad formatting when entering a comment from firefox 3 In-Reply-To: <4919C2C8.80603@gmail.com> References: <4919C2C8.80603@gmail.com> Message-ID: Bill, 2008/11/11 Bill Barry > Has anybody else noticed this or is this something possibly wrong with our > particular build (some CVS trunk revision from sometime, it identifies as > 3.3)? > I think what you're seeing might be https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461837. Kind regards Marc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jethroborsje at gmail.com Thu Nov 13 14:03:43 2008 From: jethroborsje at gmail.com (Jethro Borsje) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:03:43 +0100 Subject: Bugzilla Webservice API -> Named argument problem Message-ID: <617c53260811130603n2abe85c8sbf9a7b1e51de1b0a@mail.gmail.com> Hello everybody, I am trying to let my Java application connect to Bugzilla (v3.0.6) via the Webservice API. I am using xmlrpc-3.1 from apache, and I am trying to make it work as a small test case program. In order to login to Bugzilla I try the following: [code] // Initialize everything. HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient(); XmlRpcClient rpcClient = new XmlRpcClient(); XmlRpcCommonsTransportFactory factory = new XmlRpcCommonsTransportFactory(rpcClient); XmlRpcClientConfigImpl config = new XmlRpcClientConfigImpl(); factory.setHttpClient(httpClient); rpcClient.setTransportFactory(factory); try { config.setServerURL(new URL("http://cia/bugzilla/xmlrpc.cgi")); } catch (MalformedURLException ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); System.exit(-1); } rpcClient.setConfig(config); List loginList = new ArrayList(); loginList.add("login"); loginList.add("@.com"); loginList.add("password"); loginList.add(""); loginList.add("rememberlogin"); loginList.add("Bugzilla_remember"); // login to bugzilla Object loginResult = rpcClient.execute("User.login", loginList); System.out.println(loginResult); [/code] This results in the following error from Bugzilla: [error] Exception in thread "main" org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException: Can't use string ("login") as a HASH ref while "strict refs" in use at Bugzilla/WebService/User.pm line 39. at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcStreamTransport.readResponse(XmlRpcStreamTransport.java:186) at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcStreamTransport.sendRequest(XmlRpcStreamTransport.java:145) at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcHttpTransport.sendRequest(XmlRpcHttpTransport.java:94) at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcClientWorker.execute(XmlRpcClientWorker.java:53) at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:166) at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:157) at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:146) at bugzilla.BugzillaAutoCreate.main(BugzillaAutoCreate.java:70) [/error] I read that I have to use "named arguments", but I am not sure how to do this. Can somebody please explain to me how to create the proper argument for the rpcClient.execute("User.login", );? -- Best regards, Jethro Borsje http://www.jborsje.nl From mkanat at bugzilla.org Thu Nov 13 17:09:13 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:09:13 -0800 Subject: Bugzilla Webservice API -> Named argument problem In-Reply-To: <617c53260811130603n2abe85c8sbf9a7b1e51de1b0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <617c53260811130603n2abe85c8sbf9a7b1e51de1b0a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081113090913.73a69884@es-compy> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:03:43 +0100 "Jethro Borsje" wrote: > List loginList = new ArrayList(); You should be passing a Map, not an ArrayList. In XML-RPC terms, all Bugzilla parameters are a . -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From jethroborsje at gmail.com Fri Nov 14 08:21:03 2008 From: jethroborsje at gmail.com (Jethro Borsje) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:21:03 +0100 Subject: Bugzilla Webservice API -> Named argument problem In-Reply-To: <20081113090913.73a69884@es-compy> References: <617c53260811130603n2abe85c8sbf9a7b1e51de1b0a@mail.gmail.com> <20081113090913.73a69884@es-compy> Message-ID: <617c53260811140021u601c2302h7d557a9335466104@mail.gmail.com> Dear Max, Thank you for your reply. >> List loginList = new ArrayList(); > > You should be passing a Map, not an ArrayList. In XML-RPC > terms, all Bugzilla parameters are a . > I was aware of that, but the XMLRpcClient of Apache only lets me pass a List or an Array to the execute() method. However, I just found out the following syntax does the trick: [code]Object loginResult = rpcClient.execute("User.login", new Object[]{loginMap});[/code] So everything works fine now. Best regards, Jethro From gerv at mozilla.org Fri Nov 14 16:05:14 2008 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:05:14 +0000 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <491DA1BA.8050005@mozilla.org> David Miller wrote: > How much effort would it be to relicense by authors' permissions? Perhaps not much. Do we think this is worth looking into? Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mkanat at bugzilla.org Fri Nov 14 16:55:13 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:55:13 -0800 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: <491DA1BA.8050005@mozilla.org> References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> <491DA1BA.8050005@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <20081114085513.286f5963@es-compy> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:05:14 +0000 Gervase Markham wrote: > Perhaps not much. Do we think this is worth looking into? Hmm...what are the advantages we'd get out of using a CC license instead of the GFDL? -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From antoine.mechelynck at gmail.com Fri Nov 14 18:35:27 2008 From: antoine.mechelynck at gmail.com (Tony Mechelynck) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:35:27 +0100 Subject: bugzilla.mozilla.org pages "loading" forever? Message-ID: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081114 SeaMonkey/2.0a2pre - Build ID: 20081114000459 Not sure if this NG is the right place to report it, but all bugzilla.mozilla.org pages (and no other pages in my multitab homepage) now take "forever" to load, even after the footer is fully displayed. I have to click the Stop button to see the "tab throbber" replaced by the favicon. This is a new phenomenon in this nightly (installed a few minutes ago) AFAICT, but it also appeared (AFAICT) at the same time as the new "downtime coming soon" banner at the top of all BMO pages. Not sure whether the loading-forever problem is related with the new banner, the new nightly, or both, or neither. Please set the Followup-to header in your reply if you think you know the answer. Best regards, Tony. -- Did I say 2? I lied. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mkanat at bugzilla.org Fri Nov 14 19:23:47 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:23:47 -0800 Subject: bugzilla.mozilla.org pages "loading" forever? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20081114112347.16b3d78b@es-compy> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:35:27 +0100 Tony Mechelynck wrote: > Not sure if this NG is the right place to report it, but all > bugzilla.mozilla.org pages This is not the right place. There's probably some newsgroup for Mozilla-specific IT stuff, or you can just file a bug in the mozilla.org product on bugzilla.mozilla.org. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From antoine.mechelynck at gmail.com Fri Nov 14 19:33:26 2008 From: antoine.mechelynck at gmail.com (Tony Mechelynck) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:33:26 +0100 Subject: bugzilla.mozilla.org pages "loading" forever? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 14/11/08 20:23, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:35:27 +0100 Tony Mechelynck > wrote: >> Not sure if this NG is the right place to report it, but all >> bugzilla.mozilla.org pages > > This is not the right place. There's probably some newsgroup > for Mozilla-specific IT stuff, or you can just file a bug in the > mozilla.org product on bugzilla.mozilla.org. > > -Max The mozilla.org product, the SeaMonkey product, or the Core product? That's why I need some discussion before I can file a bug. Best regards, Tony. -- Too much of a good thing is WONDERFUL. -- Mae West _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mkanat at bugzilla.org Fri Nov 14 19:52:32 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:52:32 -0800 Subject: bugzilla.mozilla.org pages "loading" forever? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20081114115232.2f2bff17@es-compy> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:33:26 +0100 Tony Mechelynck wrote: > The mozilla.org product, the SeaMonkey product, or the Core product? The mozilla.org product, which is exactly what I said. These questions are better asked on IRC if you can get there. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From antoine.mechelynck at gmail.com Fri Nov 14 20:59:15 2008 From: antoine.mechelynck at gmail.com (Tony Mechelynck) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:59:15 +0100 Subject: bugzilla.mozilla.org pages "loading" forever? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 14/11/08 20:52, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:33:26 +0100 Tony Mechelynck > wrote: >> The mozilla.org product, the SeaMonkey product, or the Core product? > > The mozilla.org product, which is exactly what I said. These > questions are better asked on IRC if you can get there. > > -Max Problem went away all by itself. Thanks anyway. Best regards, Tony. -- Around computers it is difficult to find the correct unit of time to measure progress. Some cathedrals took a century to complete. Can you imagine the grandeur and scope of a program that would take as long? -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982 _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From justdave at bugzilla.org Fri Nov 14 21:08:04 2008 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:08:04 -0500 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: <20081114085513.286f5963@es-compy> References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> <491DA1BA.8050005@mozilla.org> <20081114085513.286f5963@es-compy> Message-ID: <491DE8B4.5000208@bugzilla.org> Max Kanat-Alexander wrote on 11/14/08 11:55 AM: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:05:14 +0000 Gervase Markham > wrote: >> Perhaps not much. Do we think this is worth looking into? > > Hmm...what are the advantages we'd get out of using a CC license > instead of the GFDL? The one thing I remember from last time we looked into it is the CC SA-BY doesn't have the strange "invariants" section that a lot of people seem to object to. -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From kairo at kairo.at Fri Nov 14 23:22:20 2008 From: kairo at kairo.at (Robert Kaiser) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:22:20 +0100 Subject: bugzilla.mozilla.org pages "loading" forever? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <-cidnZIrFYG6lYPUnZ2dnUVZ_rvinZ2d@mozilla.org> Tony Mechelynck wrote: > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081114 > SeaMonkey/2.0a2pre - Build ID: 20081114000459 > > Not sure if this NG is the right place to report it, but all > bugzilla.mozilla.org pages (and no other pages in my multitab homepage) > now take "forever" to load, even after the footer is fully displayed. I > have to click the Stop button to see the "tab throbber" replaced by the > favicon. This is not the right place to report a server problem with Bugzilla, which that was - actually, all SSL sites of Mozilla went through problems today. Robert Kaiser _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From lpsolit at gmail.com Sat Nov 15 12:57:01 2008 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:57:01 +0100 Subject: Bugzilla meeting on Tuesday, Nov. 18 at 11:00 PST (19:00 GMT, 20:00 CET) Message-ID: <491EC71D.1070108@gmail.com> Hello, Our next Bugzilla meeting will take place next Tuesday, Nov. 18 at 11:00 PST on IRC in the #bugzilla-meeting channel. Everyone is free to attend. If there is something you would like to discuss at the meeting, feel free to add an item to our agenda at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings See you on Tuesday, LpSolit From mkanat at bugzilla.org Sat Nov 15 20:56:08 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:56:08 -0800 Subject: NASA Uses Bugzilla for Space Shuttle Message-ID: <20081115125608.15f4c2b4@es-compy> Hey! We mentioned this in IRC, and I'm going to update bugzilla.org with the news about it, but I thought you'd all like to know that Friday was the first live test of two customized Bugzillas that are in use at NASA, one for the space shuttle (tracking problems with every part of it) and another for the International Space Station: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10097880-52.html Or, as justdave put it, "Bugzilla Goes To Space!" :-) -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From mkanat at bugzilla.org Sat Nov 15 22:02:04 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:02:04 -0800 Subject: NASA Uses Bugzilla for Space Shuttle In-Reply-To: <20081115125608.15f4c2b4@es-compy> References: <20081115125608.15f4c2b4@es-compy> Message-ID: <20081115140204.16773cc3@es-compy> And here's the news post on bugzilla.org about it: http://www.bugzilla.org/news/#praca -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From bugreport at peshkin.net Sat Nov 15 22:46:37 2008 From: bugreport at peshkin.net (Joel Peshkin) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:46:37 -0800 Subject: NASA Uses Bugzilla for Space Shuttle In-Reply-To: <20081115125608.15f4c2b4@es-compy> References: <20081115125608.15f4c2b4@es-compy> Message-ID: <491F514D.1010307@peshkin.net> Sure is a good thing we let them change that "Midair Collision" message. Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > Hey! We mentioned this in IRC, and I'm going to update > bugzilla.org with the news about it, but I thought you'd all like to > know that Friday was the first live test of two customized Bugzillas > that are in use at NASA, one for the space shuttle (tracking problems > with every part of it) and another for the International Space Station: > > http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10097880-52.html > > Or, as justdave put it, "Bugzilla Goes To Space!" :-) > > -Max > From mkanat at bugzilla.org Sun Nov 16 01:25:22 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:25:22 -0800 Subject: NASA Uses Bugzilla for Space Shuttle In-Reply-To: <491F514D.1010307@peshkin.net> References: <20081115125608.15f4c2b4@es-compy> <491F514D.1010307@peshkin.net> Message-ID: <20081115172522.3a969ecc@es-compy> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:46:37 -0800 Joel Peshkin wrote: > Sure is a good thing we let them change that "Midair Collision" > message. Hahahaha, yes, that was quite amusing the first time their developers saw that, as I recall. :-) -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From YLiu at bgcpartners.com Sun Nov 16 02:14:32 2008 From: YLiu at bgcpartners.com (Liu, Ye) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:14:32 -0500 Subject: How debug bugzilla Message-ID: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186EC@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Dear Bugzilla developers, I am trying to Komodo IDE to debug bugzilla remotely: the first setback I have is that when I changed index.cgi from #!/usr/bin/perl -wT to #!/usr/bin/perl -d -wT, I cannot run bugzilla correctly. The error.log of apache is showing as follows. My questions are: 1. Is that possible to use Komodo to debug bugzilla? 2. What debugger you recommend to debug bugzilla if Komodo is not recommended? Thanks, YE LIU [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script headers: index.cgi [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Loading DB routines from perl5db.pl version 1.3\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Editor support available.\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Enter h or `h h' for help, or `perldoc perldebug' for more help.\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] main::(C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi:40):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 40:\tmy $user = Bugzilla->login(LOGIN_OPTIONAL);\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Unable to get Terminal Size. The Win32 GetConsoleScreenBufferInfo call didn't work. The COLUMNS and LINES environment variables didn't work. The resize program didn't work. at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadKey.pm line 362. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \tTerm::ReadLine::Perl::new('Term::ReadLine', 'perldb', 'GLOB(0x15e10dc)', 'GLOB(0x1581f5c)') called at C:/opt/Perl/lib/perl5db.pl line 5998 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \tDB::setterm called at C:/opt/Perl/lib/perl5db.pl line 2227 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \tDB::DB called at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 40 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Bugzilla::CODE(0x28e100c)(Bugzilla.pm:442):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 442:\t _cleanup() unless $ENV{MOD_PERL};\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Attempt to reload Term/ReadLine/readline.pm aborted. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] END failed--call queue aborted at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] DBI::CODE(0x21e0e34)(C:/opt/Perl/lib/DBI.pm:504):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 504:\t return unless defined &DBI::trace_msg; # return unless bootstrap'd ok\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Attempt to reload Term/ReadLine/readline.pm aborted. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] END failed--call queue aborted at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File::Temp::CODE(0x19eec3c)(C:/opt/Perl/lib/File/Temp.pm:866):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 866:\t cleanup();\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Attempt to reload Term/ReadLine/readline.pm aborted. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] END failed--call queue aborted at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Attempt to reload Term/ReadLine/readline.pm aborted. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] END failed--call queue aborted at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Term::ReadLine::Perl::Tie::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm :130):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 130:\tsub DESTROY {}\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Class::Struct::Tie_ISA::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Class/Struct.pm:51):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 51:\t sub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] AutoLoader::AUTOLOAD(C:/opt/Perl/lib/AutoLoader.pm:22):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 22:\t my $sub = $AUTOLOAD;\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] POSIX::SigRt::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/POSIX.pm:80):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 80:\tsub DESTROY {};\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Config::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Config.pm:63):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 63:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] IO::Handle::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/IO/Handle.pm:330):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 330:\tsub DESTROY {}\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] IO::Handle::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/IO/Handle.pm:330):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 330:\tsub DESTROY {}\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] IO::Handle::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/IO/Handle.pm:330):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:36 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 330:\tsub DESTROY {}\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script headers: index.cgi [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Loading DB routines from perl5db.pl version 1.3\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Editor support available.\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Enter h or `h h' for help, or `perldoc perldebug' for more help.\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] main::(C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi:40):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 40:\tmy $user = Bugzilla->login(LOGIN_OPTIONAL);\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Unable to get Terminal Size. The Win32 GetConsoleScreenBufferInfo call didn't work. The COLUMNS and LINES environment variables didn't work. The resize program didn't work. at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadKey.pm line 362. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \tTerm::ReadLine::Perl::new('Term::ReadLine', 'perldb', 'GLOB(0x15e10dc)', 'GLOB(0x1581f5c)') called at C:/opt/Perl/lib/perl5db.pl line 5998 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \tDB::setterm called at C:/opt/Perl/lib/perl5db.pl line 2227 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] \tDB::DB called at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 40 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Bugzilla::CODE(0x28e100c)(Bugzilla.pm:442):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 442:\t _cleanup() unless $ENV{MOD_PERL};\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Attempt to reload Term/ReadLine/readline.pm aborted. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] END failed--call queue aborted at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] DBI::CODE(0x21e0e34)(C:/opt/Perl/lib/DBI.pm:504):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 504:\t return unless defined &DBI::trace_msg; # return unless bootstrap'd ok\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Attempt to reload Term/ReadLine/readline.pm aborted. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] END failed--call queue aborted at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File::Temp::CODE(0x19eec3c)(C:/opt/Perl/lib/File/Temp.pm:866):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 866:\t cleanup();\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Attempt to reload Term/ReadLine/readline.pm aborted. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] END failed--call queue aborted at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Attempt to reload Term/ReadLine/readline.pm aborted. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Compilation failed in require at C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] END failed--call queue aborted at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64. [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] at C:/opt/bugzilla-3.0.6/index.cgi line 64 [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Term::ReadLine::Perl::Tie::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Term/ReadLine/Perl.pm :130):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 130:\tsub DESTROY {}\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Class::Struct::Tie_ISA::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Class/Struct.pm:51):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 51:\t sub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] AutoLoader::AUTOLOAD(C:/opt/Perl/lib/AutoLoader.pm:22):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 22:\t my $sub = $AUTOLOAD;\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Encode::Encoding::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Encode/Encoding.pm:72):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 72:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] POSIX::SigRt::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/POSIX.pm:80):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 80:\tsub DESTROY {};\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Config::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/Config.pm:63):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 63:\tsub DESTROY { }\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] IO::Handle::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/IO/Handle.pm:330):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 330:\tsub DESTROY {}\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] IO::Handle::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/IO/Handle.pm:330):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 330:\tsub DESTROY {}\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] IO::Handle::DESTROY(C:/opt/Perl/lib/IO/Handle.pm:330):\r [Sat Nov 15 19:29:42 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] 330:\tsub DESTROY {}\r\r [Sat Nov 15 19:56:31 2008] [notice] Parent: Received shutdown signal -- Shutting down the server. [Sat Nov 15 19:56:31 2008] [notice] Child 3388: Exit event signaled. Child process is ending. [Sat Nov 15 19:56:32 2008] [notice] Child 3388: Released the start mutex [Sat Nov 15 19:56:33 2008] [notice] Child 3388: All worker threads have exited. [Sat Nov 15 19:56:33 2008] [notice] Child 3388: Child process is exiting [Sat Nov 15 19:56:33 2008] [notice] Parent: Child process exited successfully. http://www.bgcpartners.com CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail has been sent to you by one of the BGC entities (collectively BGC) listed at the following link http://www.bgcpartners.com/legal/disclaimers/index.html#email_disclaimer. The link contains company and FSA registration numbers. This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of BGC and its affiliates. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). The registered offices of the BGC entities are at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5RD. For any issues arising from this email please reply to the sender. The FSA register appears at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/. The FSA regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom and is located at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HS. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerv at mozilla.org Mon Nov 17 22:25:10 2008 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:25:10 +0000 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> <491DA1BA.8050005@mozilla.org> <20081114085513.286f5963@es-compy> Message-ID: <4921EF46.2050004@mozilla.org> David Miller wrote: > Max Kanat-Alexander wrote on 11/14/08 11:55 AM: >> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:05:14 +0000 Gervase Markham >> wrote: >>> Perhaps not much. Do we think this is worth looking into? >> Hmm...what are the advantages we'd get out of using a CC license >> instead of the GFDL? > > The one thing I remember from last time we looked into it is the CC > SA-BY doesn't have the strange "invariants" section that a lot of people > seem to object to. Right, but we don't have invariants. So it's not a direct problem - although I guess people could fork our docs and add them. The advantage is wider compatibility - people can take content from the Bugzilla guide and include it easily in other CC-licensed works. Admittedly, this is a bit nebulous. But when we relicensed the main Mozilla codebase, we couldn't imagine Songbird and Miro... Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mkanat at bugzilla.org Tue Nov 18 00:37:05 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:37:05 -0800 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: <4921EF46.2050004@mozilla.org> References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> <491DA1BA.8050005@mozilla.org> <20081114085513.286f5963@es-compy> <4921EF46.2050004@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <20081117163705.68cbf3e1@es-compy> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:25:10 +0000 Gervase Markham wrote: > The advantage is wider compatibility - people can take content from > the Bugzilla guide and include it easily in other CC-licensed works. > Admittedly, this is a bit nebulous. But when we relicensed the main > Mozilla codebase, we couldn't imagine Songbird and Miro... Okay, that's a good enough reason for me. We can go through the CVS commits and see if we can get permission from all the contributors, does that sound good? Who would do that--Gerv, or...? -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From aliustek at gmail.com Tue Nov 18 14:39:51 2008 From: aliustek at gmail.com (rojanu) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:39:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Bug 396974 - Custom fields: Ability to say "during this status, this field must have a value" Message-ID: Hi everyone! I am trying to apply https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396974 to bugzilla 3.2-rc2. I have applied it and trying to get it to work. In "Show Condition" I have tried if(document.getElementsByName('product').value== 'my_product'){ return false; } which doesn't work, because at the time the script runs "product" element is not available, then I have found "getURLParam" function from google function getURLParam(strParamName){ var strReturn = ""; var strHref = window.location.href; if ( strHref.indexOf("?") > -1 ){ var strQueryString = strHref.substr(strHref.indexOf ("?")).toLowerCase(); var aQueryString = strQueryString.split("&"); for ( var iParam = 0; iParam < aQueryString.length; iParam++ ) { if ( aQueryString[iParam].indexOf(strParamName.toLowerCase () + "=") > -1 ){ var aParam = aQueryString[iParam].split("="); strReturn = aParam[1]; break; } } } return unescape(strReturn); } and used following; if(getURLParam('product') == 'my_product'){ return false; } which woks. I don't know how am I supposed to code in "Advanced Custom fields" fields, Is above OK? Is it possible to get an example for each. Thanks _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From vivekmanchanda12 at gmail.com Wed Nov 19 07:49:40 2008 From: vivekmanchanda12 at gmail.com (chandu) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:49:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: I need the Bugzilla Api Web Services Message-ID: <415c12e3-ad44-4f7b-b12a-9ebb35557fcb@k24g2000pri.googlegroups.com> Hi all Can any one can provide me the URL from where I can get the Bugzilla Web Services I need to use Bugzilla Api in my Application. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From sm4rtus at gmail.com Wed Nov 19 13:23:49 2008 From: sm4rtus at gmail.com (sm4rtus) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:23:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: Bugzilla WebServices from Java client, getting Login required after successful login... Message-ID: <90ee0bb0-7359-4cf6-a133-2f46d7fcae6e@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> Hi, I successfully managed to login to the bugzilla via the webservices api. I set up the apache xml rpc to use the cookies (at least I think so), but I am still not able to use another commad, because I am getting Login Required error message from Bugzilla. Here is the code I use: --- XmlRpcClientConfigImpl config = new XmlRpcClientConfigImpl(); final XmlRpcClient client = new XmlRpcClient(); final HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient(); final XmlRpcCommonsTransportFactory factory = new XmlRpcCommonsTransportFactory(client); factory.setHttpClient(httpClient); client.setTransportFactory(factory); config.setServerURL(new URL("http://mybugzilla/xmlrpc.cgi")); client.setConfig(config); Object result = null; Map params = new HashMap(); params.put("login", "myname"); params.put("password", "mypass"); params.put("rememberlogin", "Bugzilla_remember"); // not sure about this line result = client.execute("User.login", new Object[]{params}); System.out.println(result); params.clear(); result = client.execute("User.logout", new Object[]{params}); System.out.println(result); params.clear(); _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From YLiu at bgcpartners.com Wed Nov 19 18:07:18 2008 From: YLiu at bgcpartners.com (Liu, Ye) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:07:18 -0500 Subject: display a new bug status Message-ID: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Dear Bugzilla Developers, I want to add a customized bug_status "PENDING". What I want to test first is whether bugzilla can display this new status or not. I update bug_status of one bug to "PENDING" then I use "search" to query this bug, I found that the status displayed is empty instead of "PENDING". I suspect that there is some filter which changes the status to empty. Can you show me some pointers on where I should modify the filter to enable bugzilla display my new status? Thanks, YE LIU http://www.bgcpartners.com CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail has been sent to you by one of the BGC entities (collectively BGC) listed at the following link http://www.bgcpartners.com/legal/disclaimers/index.html#email_disclaimer. The link contains company and FSA registration numbers. This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of BGC and its affiliates. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). The registered offices of the BGC entities are at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5RD. For any issues arising from this email please reply to the sender. The FSA register appears at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/. The FSA regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom and is located at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HS. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lpsolit at gmail.com Wed Nov 19 18:12:19 2008 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:12:19 +0100 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Message-ID: <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> Liu, Ye a ?crit : > Can you show me some pointers on where I should modify the filter to > enable bugzilla display my new status? You don't need to modify anything. Bugzilla 3.2 has a web interface to add new bug states. You are probably using 3.0.x, which doesn't support custom bug states. LpSolit From YLiu at bgcpartners.com Wed Nov 19 18:16:30 2008 From: YLiu at bgcpartners.com (Liu, Ye) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:16:30 -0500 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Hi, LpSolit Thank you for the information. Are there any upgrade steps if I still want to keep my existing bug database? Thanks, YE LIU -----Original Message----- From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Fr?d?ric Buclin Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:12 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Re: display a new bug status Liu, Ye a ?crit : > Can you show me some pointers on where I should modify the filter to > enable bugzilla display my new status? You don't need to modify anything. Bugzilla 3.2 has a web interface to add new bug states. You are probably using 3.0.x, which doesn't support custom bug states. LpSolit - To view or change your list settings, click here: http://www.bgcpartners.com CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail has been sent to you by one of the BGC entities (collectively BGC) listed at the following link http://www.bgcpartners.com/legal/disclaimers/index.html#email_disclaimer. The link contains company and FSA registration numbers. This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of BGC and its affiliates. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). The registered offices of the BGC entities are at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5RD. For any issues arising from this email please reply to the sender. The FSA register appears at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/. The FSA regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom and is located at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HS. From lpsolit at gmail.com Wed Nov 19 18:22:19 2008 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:22:19 +0100 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Message-ID: <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> Liu, Ye a ?crit : > Are there any upgrade steps if I still want to keep my existing bug database? Yes, read http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.2/en/html/upgrade.html LpSolit From YLiu at bgcpartners.com Wed Nov 19 18:25:39 2008 From: YLiu at bgcpartners.com (Liu, Ye) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:25:39 -0500 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F3@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Thanks, LpSolit YE LIU -----Original Message----- From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Fr?d?ric Buclin Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:22 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Re: display a new bug status Liu, Ye a ?crit : > Are there any upgrade steps if I still want to keep my existing bug database? Yes, read http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.2/en/html/upgrade.html LpSolit - To view or change your list settings, click here: http://www.bgcpartners.com CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail has been sent to you by one of the BGC entities (collectively BGC) listed at the following link http://www.bgcpartners.com/legal/disclaimers/index.html#email_disclaimer. The link contains company and FSA registration numbers. This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of BGC and its affiliates. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). The registered offices of the BGC entities are at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5RD. For any issues arising from this email please reply to the sender. The FSA register appears at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/. The FSA regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom and is located at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HS. From YLiu at bgcpartners.com Wed Nov 19 18:39:16 2008 From: YLiu at bgcpartners.com (Liu, Ye) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:39:16 -0500 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F4@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Hi, LpSolit I have to use bugzilla-3.0.x: company policy. Can you show me how to make the change instead? YE LIU -----Original Message----- From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Fr?d?ric Buclin Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:22 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Re: display a new bug status Liu, Ye a ?crit : > Are there any upgrade steps if I still want to keep my existing bug database? Yes, read http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.2/en/html/upgrade.html LpSolit - To view or change your list settings, click here: http://www.bgcpartners.com CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail has been sent to you by one of the BGC entities (collectively BGC) listed at the following link http://www.bgcpartners.com/legal/disclaimers/index.html#email_disclaimer. The link contains company and FSA registration numbers. This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of BGC and its affiliates. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). The registered offices of the BGC entities are at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5RD. For any issues arising from this email please reply to the sender. The FSA register appears at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/. The FSA regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom and is located at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HS. From lpsolit at gmail.com Wed Nov 19 18:47:54 2008 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:47:54 +0100 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F4@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F4@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Message-ID: <49245F5A.6090605@gmail.com> Liu, Ye a ?crit : > I have to use bugzilla-3.0.x: company policy. Can you show me how to make the change instead? No! :) Sorry, but changes to do are very invasive and numerous. It's much more work than to add a line of code or two. If you want to see how we implemented it, have a look at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101179 Note also that this bug depends on several other bugs, especially related to the workflow, which are all needed to implement this feature correctly. In no way can you take these patches as is and apply them to your 3.0.x installation; this won't work. Sorry again. :) LpSolit From YLiu at bgcpartners.com Wed Nov 19 18:54:47 2008 From: YLiu at bgcpartners.com (Liu, Ye) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:54:47 -0500 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <49245F5A.6090605@gmail.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F4@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245F5A.6090605@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F5@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> I see. Could you tell me when there will be a stable release in 3.2? Right now, there is only a stable candidate and that is reason why my company does not want to use 3.2. Thanks, YE LIU -----Original Message----- From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Fr?d?ric Buclin Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:48 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Re: display a new bug status Liu, Ye a ?crit : > I have to use bugzilla-3.0.x: company policy. Can you show me how to make the change instead? No! :) Sorry, but changes to do are very invasive and numerous. It's much more work than to add a line of code or two. If you want to see how we implemented it, have a look at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101179 Note also that this bug depends on several other bugs, especially related to the workflow, which are all needed to implement this feature correctly. In no way can you take these patches as is and apply them to your 3.0.x installation; this won't work. Sorry again. :) LpSolit - To view or change your list settings, click here: http://www.bgcpartners.com CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail has been sent to you by one of the BGC entities (collectively BGC) listed at the following link http://www.bgcpartners.com/legal/disclaimers/index.html#email_disclaimer. The link contains company and FSA registration numbers. This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of BGC and its affiliates. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). The registered offices of the BGC entities are at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5RD. For any issues arising from this email please reply to the sender. The FSA register appears at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/. The FSA regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom and is located at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HS. From lpsolit at gmail.com Wed Nov 19 18:59:02 2008 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:59:02 +0100 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F5@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F4@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245F5A.6090605@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F5@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Message-ID: <492461F6.2030703@gmail.com> Liu, Ye a ?crit : > I see. Could you tell me when there will be a stable release in 3.2? Right now, there is only a stable candidate and that is reason why my company does not want to use 3.2. 3.2 final should be available near the end of the month, per our last meeting yesterday. LpSolit From YLiu at bgcpartners.com Wed Nov 19 19:00:34 2008 From: YLiu at bgcpartners.com (Liu, Ye) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:00:34 -0500 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <492461F6.2030703@gmail.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F4@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245F5A.6090605@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F5@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <492461F6.2030703@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F6@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Thanks! YE LIU -----Original Message----- From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Fr?d?ric Buclin Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:59 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Re: display a new bug status Liu, Ye a ?crit : > I see. Could you tell me when there will be a stable release in 3.2? Right now, there is only a stable candidate and that is reason why my company does not want to use 3.2. 3.2 final should be available near the end of the month, per our last meeting yesterday. LpSolit - To view or change your list settings, click here: http://www.bgcpartners.com CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail has been sent to you by one of the BGC entities (collectively BGC) listed at the following link http://www.bgcpartners.com/legal/disclaimers/index.html#email_disclaimer. The link contains company and FSA registration numbers. This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of BGC and its affiliates. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). The registered offices of the BGC entities are at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5RD. For any issues arising from this email please reply to the sender. The FSA register appears at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/. The FSA regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom and is located at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HS. From mkanat at bugzilla.org Wed Nov 19 18:56:40 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:56:40 -0800 Subject: display a new bug status In-Reply-To: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F5@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F1@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245703.5070904@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F2@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <4924595B.2080309@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F4@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <49245F5A.6090605@gmail.com> <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F5@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Message-ID: <20081119105640.0052cdcc@es-compy> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:54:47 -0500 "Liu, Ye" wrote: > I see. Could you tell me when there will be a stable release in 3.2? > Right now, there is only a stable candidate and that is reason why my > company does not want to use 3.2. This discussion really belongs on the support-bugzilla mailing list. The developers@ list is for discussing the development of upstream Bugzilla. You can read about the support list here: http://www.bugzilla.org/support/ -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From mkanat at bugzilla.org Wed Nov 19 19:03:28 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:03:28 -0800 Subject: Bugzilla WebServices from Java client, getting Login required after successful login... In-Reply-To: <90ee0bb0-7359-4cf6-a133-2f46d7fcae6e@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> References: <90ee0bb0-7359-4cf6-a133-2f46d7fcae6e@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <20081119110328.28114424@es-compy> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:23:49 -0800 (PST) sm4rtus wrote: > I successfully managed to login to the bugzilla via the webservices > api. [snip] Since this doesn't have to do with upstream development, you should ask on the support list, described here: http://www.bugzilla.org/support/ -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From mkanat at bugzilla.org Wed Nov 19 19:04:55 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:04:55 -0800 Subject: I need the Bugzilla Api Web Services In-Reply-To: <415c12e3-ad44-4f7b-b12a-9ebb35557fcb@k24g2000pri.googlegroups.com> References: <415c12e3-ad44-4f7b-b12a-9ebb35557fcb@k24g2000pri.googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <20081119110455.383d20de@es-compy> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:49:40 -0800 (PST) chandu wrote: > Can any one can provide me the URL from where I can get the Bugzilla > Web Services I need to use Bugzilla Api in my Application. This question would be more appropriate for the support-bugzilla mailing list, described here: http://www.bugzilla.org/support/ This list is for Bugzilla Project developers to discuss the development of Bugzilla itself, here. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From mkanat at bugzilla.org Wed Nov 19 19:06:10 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:06:10 -0800 Subject: Bug 396974 - Custom fields: Ability to say "during this status, this field must have a value" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20081119110610.6717ab81@es-compy> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:39:51 -0800 (PST) rojanu wrote: > I am trying to apply > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396974 > > to bugzilla 3.2-rc2. Hi! Discussions about customizing your Bugzilla belong on the support-bugzilla mailing list, described here: http://www.bugzilla.org/support/ -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From mkanat at bugzilla.org Wed Nov 19 19:07:01 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:07:01 -0800 Subject: How debug bugzilla In-Reply-To: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186EC@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186EC@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Message-ID: <20081119110701.42bb270e@es-compy> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:14:32 -0500 "Liu, Ye" wrote: > 2. What debugger you recommend to debug bugzilla if Komodo is not > recommended? I never really use a debugger, I just put warn statements in the code. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From sm4rtus at gmail.com Wed Nov 19 19:45:09 2008 From: sm4rtus at gmail.com (sm4rtus) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:45:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Bugzilla WebServices from Java client, getting Login required after successful login... References: <90ee0bb0-7359-4cf6-a133-2f46d7fcae6e@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <8478ba7f-96b0-480f-9c60-33c30c48eea7@k19g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> On Nov 19, 8:03 pm, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:23:49 -0800 (PST) sm4rtus > wrote: > > > I successfully managed to login to the bugzilla via the webservices > > api. [snip] > > Since this doesn't have to do with upstream development, you > should ask on the support list, described here: > > http://www.bugzilla.org/support/ > > -Max > --http://www.everythingsolved.com/ > Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > Thanks. I found out what is the problem. According to RFC2409 (about cookies) Domain=domain Optional. The Domain attribute specifies the domain for which the cookie is valid. An explicitly specified domain must always start with a dot. Bugzilla send the cookies with domain NOT starting with a dot and Apache HttpClient rejects it. I am not sure, if this is a correct behaviour, the bugzilla cookies in the browser work, is Firefox just lenient? :) _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From YLiu at bgcpartners.com Wed Nov 19 19:48:06 2008 From: YLiu at bgcpartners.com (Liu, Ye) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:48:06 -0500 Subject: How debug bugzilla In-Reply-To: <20081119110701.42bb270e@es-compy> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186EC@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> <20081119110701.42bb270e@es-compy> Message-ID: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186F7@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Hi, Max Could you provide a statement to print out the warning? Thanks, YE LIU -----Original Message----- From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Max Kanat-Alexander Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:07 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Re: How debug bugzilla On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:14:32 -0500 "Liu, Ye" wrote: > 2. What debugger you recommend to debug bugzilla if Komodo is not > recommended? I never really use a debugger, I just put warn statements in the code. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. - To view or change your list settings, click here: http://www.bgcpartners.com CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail has been sent to you by one of the BGC entities (collectively BGC) listed at the following link http://www.bgcpartners.com/legal/disclaimers/index.html#email_disclaimer. The link contains company and FSA registration numbers. This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of BGC and its affiliates. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). The registered offices of the BGC entities are at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5RD. For any issues arising from this email please reply to the sender. The FSA register appears at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/. The FSA regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom and is located at 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HS. From dmarshal at yahoo-inc.com Wed Nov 19 19:56:41 2008 From: dmarshal at yahoo-inc.com (David Marshall) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:56:41 -0800 Subject: How debug bugzilla In-Reply-To: <20081119110701.42bb270e@es-compy> Message-ID: On 11/19/08 11:07 AM, "Max Kanat-Alexander" wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:14:32 -0500 "Liu, Ye" > wrote: >> 2. What debugger you recommend to debug bugzilla if Komodo is not >> recommended? > > I never really use a debugger, I just put warn statements in > the code. > Semi-yuck. In my opinion, it is a better practice to figure out how to use whatever debugging tools are available; printing stuff out is inefficient. While I will admit that sometimes I do it to diagnose hard-to-find bugs (in addition to Log4perl logging that we do at Yahoo!), it's relatively easy to step through Bugzilla stuff with the vanilla Perl debugger. If someone will remind me in a few weeks when we are fiddling around with 3.2 code at Y!, I will be happy to provide a brief tutorial on how to do it. From justdave at bugzilla.org Wed Nov 19 20:45:07 2008 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:45:07 -0500 Subject: How debug bugzilla In-Reply-To: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186EC@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186EC@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Message-ID: <49247AD3.7090608@bugzilla.org> Liu, Ye wrote on 11/15/08 9:14 PM: > I am trying to Komodo IDE to debug bugzilla remotely: the first setback > I have is that when I changed index.cgi from > > #!/usr/bin/perl ?wT to #!/usr/bin/perl -d ?wT, I cannot run bugzilla > correctly. The error.log of apache is showing as follows. My questions are: > > 1. Is that possible to use Komodo to debug bugzilla? > > 2. What debugger you recommend to debug bugzilla if Komodo is not > recommended? In my experience, it's really hard (like almost impossible) to use an IDE-based debugger on a web application, because the code is designed to be run via a web server, and it just doesn't do well standalone. There are several debuggers you can hook in that do various tasks and write to log files though, which work well. The DBI Profiler and DProf are two that spring to mind. I'm sure there's others. -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From spamsux at forgetit.org Wed Nov 19 22:43:38 2008 From: spamsux at forgetit.org (Steve Wendt) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:43:38 -0800 Subject: How debug bugzilla In-Reply-To: References: <0E31D03F3A4D9E4ABECCDD41315A4E2E0186EC@TBEXCHMBXPDVS01.na.ad.espeed.com> Message-ID: On 11/19/2008 12:45 PM, David Miller wrote: > In my experience, it's really hard (like almost impossible) to use an > IDE-based debugger on a web application, because the code is designed to > be run via a web server, and it just doesn't do well standalone. It's not impossible, but you do need a web server module. Zend Studio does a great job of this for PHP code. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From vitaly.fedrushkov at gmail.com Thu Nov 20 13:05:57 2008 From: vitaly.fedrushkov at gmail.com (vitaly.fedrushkov at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:05:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: NASA Uses Bugzilla for Space Shuttle References: Message-ID: <91c108d8-3256-4981-89a7-ed5560c5a3cb@g38g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> On Nov 16, 1:56?am, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > two customized Bugzillas > that are in use at NASA, one for the space shuttle (tracking problems > with every part of it) and another for the International Space Station: As manned programs are partnered with Roscosmos, maybe Russian interface will help also? Regards, Vitaly. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From vitaly.fedrushkov at gmail.com Thu Nov 20 13:09:06 2008 From: vitaly.fedrushkov at gmail.com (vitaly.fedrushkov at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:09:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: Move to Maketext: request for comments Message-ID: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> Good $daytime, L10N team is about to start working on its current primary target: support for Locale::Maketext, localizable templates and Perl code. There are several questions which I would like to discuss, such as: Custom template support; Directory structure; How to maintain backwards compatibility; Transition problems; Build tools, test suites, etc. Kindly look into https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:L10n:Roadmap#Use_Locale::Maketext, and bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407752 Waiting for your feedback, Regards, Vitaly. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From vivekmanchanda12 at gmail.com Thu Nov 20 13:56:04 2008 From: vivekmanchanda12 at gmail.com (chandu) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:56:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Bugzilla Webservice API -> Named argument problem References: Message-ID: <60aa8464-e969-4533-b238-de1be668d256@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com> On Nov 13, 7:03?pm, "Jethro Borsje" wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am trying to let my Java application connect to Bugzilla (v3.0.6) > via the Webservice API. I am using xmlrpc-3.1 from apache, and I am > trying to make it work as a small test case program. In order to login > to Bugzilla I try the following: > [code] > // Initialize everything. > HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient(); > XmlRpcClient rpcClient = new XmlRpcClient(); > XmlRpcCommonsTransportFactory factory = new > XmlRpcCommonsTransportFactory(rpcClient); > XmlRpcClientConfigImpl config = new XmlRpcClientConfigImpl(); > factory.setHttpClient(httpClient); > rpcClient.setTransportFactory(factory); > try > { > ? ?config.setServerURL(new URL("http://cia/bugzilla/xmlrpc.cgi"));} > > catch (MalformedURLException ex) > { > ? ?ex.printStackTrace(); > ? ?System.exit(-1);} > > rpcClient.setConfig(config); > > List loginList = new ArrayList(); > loginList.add("login"); > loginList.add("@.com"); > loginList.add("password"); > loginList.add(""); > loginList.add("rememberlogin"); > loginList.add("Bugzilla_remember"); > > // login to bugzilla > Object loginResult = rpcClient.execute("User.login", loginList); > System.out.println(loginResult); > [/code] > > This results in the following error from Bugzilla: > [error] > Exception in thread "main" org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException: Can't > use string ("login") as a HASH ref while "strict refs" in use at > Bugzilla/WebService/User.pm line 39. > ? ? ? ? at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcStreamTransport.readResponse(XmlRpcStreamTransport.java:186) > ? ? ? ? at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcStreamTransport.sendRequest(XmlRpcStreamTransport.java:145) > ? ? ? ? at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcHttpTransport.sendRequest(XmlRpcHttpTransport.java:94) > ? ? ? ? at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcClientWorker.execute(XmlRpcClientWorker.java:53) > ? ? ? ? at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:166) > ? ? ? ? at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:157) > ? ? ? ? at org.apache.xmlrpc.client.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:146) > ? ? ? ? at bugzilla.BugzillaAutoCreate.main(BugzillaAutoCreate.java:70) > [/error] > > I read that I have to use "named arguments", but I am not sure how to > do this. Can somebody please explain to me how to create the proper > argument for the rpcClient.execute("User.login", );? > > -- > Best regards, > Jethro Borsje > > http://www.jborsje.nl > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > Hi > > I am trying to Integrate bugzilla but I am not able to get any Web > Services or WSDl related to that I was hoping if you can provide me > the WSDL or some link from where I can find this Web Services or WSDL. > > Any help will be great. Vivek Manchanda _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mkanat at bugzilla.org Thu Nov 20 16:41:25 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:41:25 -0800 Subject: Bugzilla Webservice API -> Named argument problem In-Reply-To: <60aa8464-e969-4533-b238-de1be668d256@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com> References: <60aa8464-e969-4533-b238-de1be668d256@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <20081120084125.5ca54a10@es-compy> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:56:04 -0800 (PST) chandu wrote: > > I am trying to Integrate bugzilla but I am not able to get any Web > > Services or WSDl related to that I was hoping if you can provide me > > the WSDL or some link from where I can find this Web Services or > > WSDL. This question would be more appropriate for the support-bugzilla mailing list, described here: http://www.bugzilla.org/support/ Also, you wrote it like it was a reply, which was very confusing. Start your own threads on mailing lists when you have questions. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From gerv at mozilla.org Thu Nov 20 17:29:55 2008 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:29:55 +0000 Subject: Bugzilla documentation in wiki? In-Reply-To: References: <1s2dnb1LMufmGYnUnZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@mozilla.org> <491DA1BA.8050005@mozilla.org> <20081114085513.286f5963@es-compy> <4921EF46.2050004@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <25SdnZpvi6AOA7jUnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@mozilla.org> Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > Okay, that's a good enough reason for me. We can go through the > CVS commits and see if we can get permission from all the contributors, > does that sound good? Who would do that--Gerv, or...? Sorry, I don't have time. I can provide advice and the voice of experience only :-) Anyone can do the hard work. The email asking about relicensing should (I strongly suggest) be reviewed by me, and should probably be sent by the project lead. Then someone needs to collate replies. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mkanat at bugzilla.org Wed Nov 26 01:29:13 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:29:13 -0800 Subject: Release Planned For Saturday Message-ID: <20081125172913.30e7b4b3@es-compy> Hey there! So, currently all blockers are fixed, and all the website updates are reviewed and ready for the 3.2 release. If you know of any bugs that should block us from releasing 3.2, please nominate them as blocking3.2. If everything keeps on being OK, I plan on releasing Bugzilla 3.2 on Saturday, November 29. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From cedric.corazza at gmail.com Wed Nov 26 18:50:54 2008 From: cedric.corazza at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Corazza?=) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:50:54 +0100 Subject: About bug 407752 Message-ID: Hi, Currently, the code and the localization are melted thus not accessible for localizers without technical skills. The gettext solution sounds nice and should be easily implemented for files such as code-error.html.tmpl, messages.html.tmpl or user-error.html.tmpl, but tricky and painful for developers I guess for other files where code and localizable strings are intimately intermingled. Also, I think this will be tricky for localizers, especially if all the localizable strings are gathered in an only one file, to localize these strings without context. I'm especially thinking about very short strings such as "a", "of", "on", etc or when sentences are "cut" with code idn many places. Last but not least, the locales that have already localized Bugzilla will have to do the whole job again. A positive point though : if all these problems are overcome, all the localization files might be hosted on bugzilla.org and Bugzilla might be released in all the available languages at once. My two cents... C?dric _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From dottedmag at dottedmag.net Wed Nov 26 18:55:27 2008 From: dottedmag at dottedmag.net (Mikhail Gusarov) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:55:27 +0600 Subject: About bug 407752 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22?= =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Corazza"'s message of "Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:50:54 +0100") References: Message-ID: <87iqqaiag0.fsf@frontier.dottedmag.net> Twas brillig at 19:50:54 26.11.2008 UTC+01 when cedric.corazza at gmail.com did gyre and gimble: CC> I'm especially thinking about very short strings such as "a", "of", CC> "on", etc or when sentences are "cut" with code idn many places. gettext is for translating whole sentences - it is impossible to translate "a/of/on" without context. While this means all templates need to be heavily changed, and many translation strings will contain lots of parameters to substitute, this is the only correct way to translate anything. -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 196 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From kwasi.gyasiagyei at 4things.co.za Thu Nov 27 09:07:45 2008 From: kwasi.gyasiagyei at 4things.co.za (Kwasi Gyasi - Agyei) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:07:45 +0200 Subject: Installing Bugzilla on WHM/VPS/Cpanel Message-ID: Hi, I just started a software development company and I wanted to know how do I install Bugzilla on WHM/VPS/CPanel Googling has bene much help so far. Warm Regards _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From justdave at bugzilla.org Thu Nov 27 14:48:11 2008 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:48:11 -0500 Subject: Installing Bugzilla on WHM/VPS/Cpanel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <492EB32B.2060509@bugzilla.org> Kwasi Gyasi - Agyei wrote on 11/27/08 4:07 AM: > I just started a software development company and I wanted to know how > do I install Bugzilla on WHM/VPS/CPanel Googling has bene much help so far. This newsgroup is for developer discussion about the Bugzilla project, for support you want to be posting in mozilla.support.bugzilla instead. -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From mkanat at bugzilla.org Sun Nov 30 03:39:47 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:39:47 -0800 Subject: Plans for Bugzilla 3.4 Freeze Message-ID: <20081129193947.1d801fbb@es-compy> Hey folks! So we released 3.2 today (yay!) and that means that the Bugzilla 3.4 freeze will be on Thursday, January 29, 2009. It will work the same as the Bugzilla 3.2 freeze. We will branch for 3.4, and the 3.4 branch will be locked down to bug fixes while the trunk stays open for new features. In reality, this means that we usually don't branch for a few weeks, until there's some major new feature that needs to be checked into the trunk. Note that this freeze will happen no matter what the 3.4 codebase looks like, or how many new features we have at that time. The goal is to have smaller releases that come out more quickly. In order to have enough time for people to test our development releases and give feedback, I want to release a 3.3.1 within the next two weeks. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net Sun Nov 30 05:30:54 2008 From: fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net (Vitaly Fedrushkov) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:30:54 +0500 Subject: Move to Maketext: request for comments In-Reply-To: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> References: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <4932250E.1070701@users.sourceforge.net> Good $daytime, Maketext description is recently expanded (and moved to separate wiki page). I also tried to address some concerns already expressed by developers. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:L10n:Maketext Your feedback is most appreciated with regard to some questions still unanswered: * Directory structure and .po files placement * How many .po files per language we need? * Is Locale::Maketext::Fuzzy practical? * Work breakdown needs review Thanks in advance. Regards, Vitaly. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From mkanat at bugzilla.org Sun Nov 30 05:52:52 2008 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:52:52 -0800 Subject: Move to Maketext: request for comments In-Reply-To: <4932250E.1070701@users.sourceforge.net> References: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4932250E.1070701@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <20081129215252.3af312f6@es-compy> On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:30:54 +0500 Vitaly Fedrushkov wrote: > * Directory structure and .po files placement I think they should go into a new directory, something like lang// > * How many .po files per language we need? Well, we're going to have an enormous number of strings, I believe. I think we should probably have one .po per top-level template directory that we have now. Otherwise we'd be reading in a huge file for every page load, which would be a big problem under mod_perl (which would never release that memory). That is, unless we just pre-compile translated templates, in which case it could all be in one file (but I think having such a huge file would still be a problem for some text editors). > * Is Locale::Maketext::Fuzzy practical? No, we should avoid it if we can, I think. The standard %quant() system used by most Maketext implementations seems better to me. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. From fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net Sun Nov 30 07:45:43 2008 From: fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net (Vitaly Fedrushkov) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:45:43 +0500 Subject: Move to Maketext: request for comments In-Reply-To: <87oczxg3zs.fsf@frontier.dottedmag.net> References: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4932250E.1070701@users.sourceforge.net> <87oczxg3zs.fsf@frontier.dottedmag.net> Message-ID: <493244A7.7010105@users.sourceforge.net> Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Bugzilla/* means Linux packagers will have to separate po files to > another directory, as it contains only Perl code for now, and code goes > to /usr/lib/perl5/... Agreed, valid reason for not going this way. > default/custom separation is from the days when no flexible version > control systems existed, IMHO. Personally I have no problem maintaining > a customizations on top of default/* hierarchy under git. And what about per-project and per-extension templates? > VF> * Is Locale::Maketext::Fuzzy practical? > Will xgettext.pl create entries for special cases (and special cases > will grow in combinatorial numbers)? If not, then it will be hard to > use. Well, when the code to 'say' a full sentence is long and sophisticated (as can be seen in "auth_failure" error message), it may be practical to wrap the entire snippet with [% |l %]...[% END %] instead of having trouble of single words translated without context. xgettext.pl will not help here, for obvious reasons. I'd suggest pseudo comments putting together variants of text generated by this code snippet. These variants may be addressed by old good static lexicon entries (yes they may grow in combinatorial numbers) or by fuzzy entries. As these will emerge in predictably MUCH less numbers than static entries, perhaps we may keep TWO lexicons, 'static' and 'fuzzy', and use explicit fuzzy calls like '[% |l_fuzzy %]...[% END %]. This would save us from 'charge of the light brigade': iterating through thousands of keys each time fuzzy match is required. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net Sun Nov 30 08:05:40 2008 From: fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net (Vitaly Fedrushkov) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:05:40 +0500 Subject: Move to Maketext: request for comments In-Reply-To: References: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4932250E.1070701@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <49324954.60502@users.sourceforge.net> Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > That is, unless we just pre-compile translated templates, in > which case it could all be in one file (but I think having such a huge > file would still be a problem for some text editors). File size is not a problem, there are Translate Toolkit tools and special .po file editors (and yes Emacs major mode, too). >> * How many .po files per language we need? > Well, we're going to have an enormous number of strings, I > believe. I think we should probably have one .po per top-level template > directory that we have now. Otherwise we'd be reading in a huge file > for every page load, which would be a big problem under mod_perl (which > would never release that memory). Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Why separate web/cli/email messages? My primary concern here was lexicon loading overhead, not its memory footprint. If we can reduce from one loading per request to, say, one per single persistent http connection -- worth it? Single Bugzilla object would cache only relevant lexicons, best matched by Accept-Language. And single lexicon size and loading overhead may be reduced by splitting to several 'caller contexts': - web (CGI scripts, pm modules, web templates) - email (cron scripts, pm modules, email templates) - command line (.pl scripts, pm modules, global templates only) Which will lead to approximately six lexicons: - Generic templates (global/*) - Email templates - Web templates (the rest) - Bugzilla.pm and below - .cgi scripts - .pl scripts This split serves no other purpose but to avoid loading all of them every time. Regards, Vitaly. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From dottedmag at dottedmag.net Sun Nov 30 08:21:10 2008 From: dottedmag at dottedmag.net (Mikhail Gusarov) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:21:10 +0600 Subject: Move to Maketext: request for comments In-Reply-To: <49324954.60502@users.sourceforge.net> (Vitaly Fedrushkov's message of "Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:05:40 +0500") References: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4932250E.1070701@users.sourceforge.net> <49324954.60502@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <87ej0tfwuh.fsf@frontier.dottedmag.net> Twas brillig at 13:05:40 30.11.2008 UTC+05 when fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net did gyre and gimble: >> Why separate web/cli/email messages? VF> My primary concern here was lexicon loading overhead, not its VF> memory footprint. If we can reduce from one loading per request VF> to, say, one per single persistent http connection -- worth it? Anyway, IIRC gettext loads entries from .mo files on demand, so splitting looks like a premature optimization even without per-http-connection trick. Maybe it is time to measure a bit? -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 196 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net Sun Nov 30 09:37:51 2008 From: fedrushkov at users.sourceforge.net (Vitaly Fedrushkov) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:37:51 +0500 Subject: Move to Maketext: request for comments In-Reply-To: References: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4932250E.1070701@users.sourceforge.net> <49324954.60502@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <49325EEF.4040302@users.sourceforge.net> Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Anyway, IIRC gettext loads entries from .mo files on demand Had a look into sources. In fact there wasn't any on demand load: both Locale::Maketext::Gettext::read_mo() and Locale::Maketext::Lexicon::Gettext::parse() seem to read all their arguments at once. Locale::Maketext::Lexicon::Tie() can be used as on demand loader, if someone writes a backend. Regards, Vitaly. _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla From lpsolit at gmail.com Sun Nov 30 18:30:40 2008 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:30:40 +0100 Subject: Move to Maketext: request for comments In-Reply-To: <49325EEF.4040302@users.sourceforge.net> References: <5d7313b6-1d25-41a5-ba82-b4ac5a75c4b3@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4932250E.1070701@users.sourceforge.net> <49324954.60502@users.sourceforge.net> <49325EEF.4040302@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <4932DBD0.3000509@gmail.com> I know nothing about Maketext, so my question will be trivial: What is the perf impact of using maketext (memory usage, CPU load, responsiveness)? I would hate to see Bugzilla being a monster in these respective areas. Some users reported that Bugzilla 3.2 is slower than 3.0. I don't know if they have valid data to confirm this or if they just wanted to say something, but I would hate to discover that they are right, even if 3.2 has more features than 3.0. LpSolit