Switching to Bazaar (bzr)
mkanat at bugzilla.org
Sat Dec 20 23:50:06 UTC 2008
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:59:43 +0100 Cédric Corazza
<cedric.corazza at gmail.com> wrote:
> Apart from the fact the dev team already dealt with bzr repos, are
> there any other reasons to move to Bazaar?
http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrVsHg is a fairly good explanation of
some of the advantages of Bzr over Hg.
> Is Mercurial not an option, and if so why?
It's an option, it's just not the preferred option at the
moment, though we could possibly be convinced otherwise. I think bzr
has better architecture, is simpler, and has better prospects for
future improvement than Mercurial does (particularly given how quickly
and often bzr releases).
> The multiplicity of tools is an obstacle for new locales to come.
> Though this move is just about the Bugzilla Project, Bugzilla is part
> of the Mozilla products.
> I just wanted to state about this part of the move.
Yeah, I understand, and I appreciate you bringing up the point.
I think that lots of people are experiencing this nowadays--for so
long, CVS was the de-facto standard, and then after that, there was only
SVN to replace it. But then suddenly there were several DVCSes, all at
once, to replace SVN & CVS, and none of them have really come out as a
clear standard. My understanding is that even with hg.mozilla.org, it's
not guaranteed that Mozilla is going to stay with it forever, only for
this Core development cycle.
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too.
More information about the developers