All QA tests done. a=qa_team for 3.0 RC1

[Vlad Dascalu]

There are currently 7 non-security bugs pending approval? for Bugzilla 3.0.

Some of them are trivial changes and some fix important bugs; it will
certainly be worthy in my opinion to take some of them in the 3.0.1
train, especially since most of them can be tested easily for QA
individually due to their scoped changes.

Releasing 3.0.1 with some of those problems when we have patches for
them would be suboptimal. Now that QA is done, someone needs to review
them and decide which are 3.0.1 worthy based on how easy is to do QA
for them individually, the probability to regress something and their
overall worthiness.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391945
Staggered headers don't check dotweak properly

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390370
Products should be Other Classifications

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365060
Edit products is missing a :

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387607
detect and accommodate restored "edit attachment as comment" mode

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365088
(Voters) is a strange way to let me see other people who voted for a bug

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356807
CSV export expose text/plain as MIME content type

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221827
Missing Bug ID shouldn't be handled as Invalid Bug ID


On 2/21/07, Frédéric Buclin <lpsolit at gmail.com> wrote:
> Except some minor bugs with dependency trees (bugs 309108 and 370883)
> and the UI issue some users are experiencing when viewing bugs (bug
> 370739), Bugzilla 3.0 RC1 is ready for release. a=qa_team. :)
>
> The bugs mentioned above won't block RC1 and it will be available for
> download as soon as the release stuff is complete, which could happen
> this week.
>
> LpSolit
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=vladd@bugzilla.org>
>