prioritizing custom fields development

Max Kanat-Alexander mkanat at
Wed Mar 15 18:24:46 UTC 2006

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:05 -0700, Greg Hendricks wrote:
> We offered it back and were told that was not 
> the direction Bugzilla was going. This was back in the days we had the raging 
> debate over custom field implementation.  So my question is, has there been a 
> change of direction? Because this seems to be exactly what we have already.

	That patch's problem isn't the feature set offered, it's the
implementation, and the size of the patch. Nobody could have ever
humanly reviewed a patch of that size (note that a patch of that size
has never been accepted into Bugzilla, as far as I know), and the *way*
it was coded wasn't the direction Bugzilla was going.

Competent, Friendly Bugzilla Services. And Everything Else, too.

More information about the developers mailing list