UI module owner

[Gervase Markham]

timeless wrote:
> That was intentional. If I showed you the critique, you'd have adapted
> personas and claimed that it didn't fail as badly as it did. You can
> find the entry, but I expect that you will honor my request and *not*
> add things listed in it. Because the act of reading it and adding the
> items listed constitutes cheating. I proposed a 2 week moratorium
> before I published it for you to view so that people could see how
> spectacularly your proposal *failed* to capture the world it purported
> to describe.

I'm speechless. Is this the way you "cooperate" with your colleagues on
a software project?

Gerv