From lpsolit at gmail.com Sat Apr 1 09:19:10 2006 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:19:10 +0200 Subject: Customizing bugzilla workflow (bug #101179) In-Reply-To: <00b301c654be$197beff0$0813a8c0@aitec.pt> References: <00b301c654be$197beff0$0813a8c0@aitec.pt> Message-ID: <442E458E.5090000@gmail.com> This discussion should be posted as a comment in bug 101179. People interested in this discussion are probably in the CC list of that bug. LpSolit From vladd at bugzilla.org Sat Apr 1 10:12:25 2006 From: vladd at bugzilla.org (Vlad Dascalu) Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 13:12:25 +0300 Subject: Minimum required DBI version In-Reply-To: <1143841874.26691.3.camel@syd.mkgnu.net> References: <1143841874.26691.3.camel@syd.mkgnu.net> Message-ID: <442E5209.2080108@bugzilla.org> In order to prevent loosing track on this, please fill a bug about it on bugzilla.mozilla.org (if one doesn't exist already). Thanks :) Vlad Kristis Makris wrote: > Hello, > > The Bugzilla installation section claims that DBI 1.38 is the minimum > required version to get Bugzilla working. > > http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/installation.html#install-perlmodules > > We discovered that under Windows if one uses a DBI that is < 1.50 to > talk to Bugzilla 2.20 (previous releases work fine), and one happens to > fork multiple processes that use the DBI, the DBI exits unexpectedly. > > This is documented in: > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=646 > http://bugs.activestate.com/show_bug.cgi?id=45411 > > In any case, I wanted to give you a heads up. This might come up if one > builds additional tools in Windows that use Bugzilla. Perhaps the > minimum required DBI version should be 1.50, and not 1.38. > > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > > > From mkgnu at mkgnu.net Mon Apr 3 20:03:07 2006 From: mkgnu at mkgnu.net (Kristis Makris) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:03:07 -0700 Subject: Minimum required DBI version In-Reply-To: <442E5209.2080108@bugzilla.org> References: <1143841874.26691.3.camel@syd.mkgnu.net> <442E5209.2080108@bugzilla.org> Message-ID: <1144094587.3018.4.camel@syd.mkgnu.net> On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 13:12 +0300, Vlad Dascalu wrote: > In order to prevent loosing track on this, please fill a bug about it on > bugzilla.mozilla.org (if one doesn't exist already). Thanks :) It is now filed under: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332600 From kevin.benton at amd.com Wed Apr 5 15:26:21 2006 From: kevin.benton at amd.com (Benton, Kevin) Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 08:26:21 -0700 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. Message-ID: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42028622D1@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> > Cheap trick in browsers... > > If you want to specify a file type via the URL of a CGI, use this > > http://path/to/my.cgi/filename.ext?thisvar=that... > > Apache knows enough to stop at the my.cgi. The browser doesn't, > however, and will take the extension specified. To answer my own post, here's a better way... The CGI should specify a filename suggestion in the content header. To do this, use "Content-disposition: filename=" to specify the file name suggestion to the user. This is covered in RFC 2183 (1997). See the example below. ===== snip snip snip ====== cut here ====== Content-type: text/csv Content-disposition: filename=mylist.csv "Hello world", "abc", 2 ===== snip snip snip ====== cut here ====== I think we should standardize on this method. --- Kevin Benton Perl/Bugzilla Developer/Administrator, Perforce SCM Administrator Digital Media Pervasive Computing Solutions Group Advanced Micro Devices The opinions stated in this communication do not necessarily reflect the view of Advanced Micro Devices and have not been reviewed by management. This communication may contain sensitive and/or confidential and/or proprietary information. Distribution of such information is strictly prohibited without prior consent of Advanced Micro Devices. This communication is for the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender, then destroy any remaining copies of this communication. From mkanat at bugzilla.org Wed Apr 5 19:23:49 2006 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:23:49 -0700 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. In-Reply-To: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42028622D1@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42028622D1@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> Message-ID: <1144265029.3366.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:26 -0700, Benton, Kevin wrote: > ===== snip snip snip ====== cut here ====== > Content-type: text/csv > Content-disposition: filename=mylist.csv > > "Hello world", "abc", 2 > ===== snip snip snip ====== cut here ====== > > I think we should standardize on this method. We do. :-) buglist.cgi: -content_disposition => "$disp; filename=$filename"); -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla Services. And Everything Else, too. From kevin.benton at amd.com Wed Apr 5 21:17:14 2006 From: kevin.benton at amd.com (Benton, Kevin) Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 14:17:14 -0700 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. Message-ID: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C732A@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> > We do. :-) > > buglist.cgi: -content_disposition => "$disp; filename=$filename"); Just figured out there's a potential bug there - $filename should have "'s around it. --- Kevin Benton Perl/Bugzilla Developer/Administrator, Perforce SCM Administrator AMD - ECSD Software Validation and Tools The opinions stated in this communication do not necessarily reflect the view of Advanced Micro Devices and have not been reviewed by management. This communication may contain sensitive and/or confidential and/or proprietary information. Distribution of such information is strictly prohibited without prior consent of Advanced Micro Devices. This communication is for the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender, then destroy any remaining copies of this communication. From bugzilla at glob.com.au Thu Apr 6 01:00:18 2006 From: bugzilla at glob.com.au (byron jones) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:00:18 +0800 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. In-Reply-To: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C732A@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C732A@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> Message-ID: <20060406010018.GA13432@bur.st> > > buglist.cgi: -content_disposition => "$disp; filename=$filename"); > > Just figured out there's a potential bug there - $filename should have > "'s around it. and encoded if it's more than 78 chars, or non-ascii. -- begin-base64 644 signature.gif R0lGODlhbQAHAIAAAABPo////ywAAAAAbQAHAAACfAxuGAnch+Bibkn7FL1p XgVl4Ig1jjlZRoqybgun2Cur5uOunq7u/Ipq7WIyIc7XG9JquEgumPzdlhTf h0O83kDJaXEm8mRHwXKJy5sac7qYOpT+gtv0n+0ujQOfdqh16caWt0foBViH N1PRMXimiLUGt3ElVimlgbllWAAAOw== ==== From justdave at bugzilla.org Thu Apr 6 01:28:19 2006 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:28:19 -0400 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. In-Reply-To: <20060406010018.GA13432@bur.st> References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C732A@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> <20060406010018.GA13432@bur.st> Message-ID: <44346EB3.60801@bugzilla.org> byron jones wrote on 4/5/06 9:00 PM: >>> buglist.cgi: -content_disposition => "$disp; filename=$filename"); >> Just figured out there's a potential bug there - $filename should have >> "'s around it. > > and encoded if it's more than 78 chars, or non-ascii. please research old bugs before touching this. It was broken on several browsers a year or two ago, and it got researched the hell out of to find out how to do it right. If it's broken now, someone probably reverted it on accident. Otherwise, it's likely the way it is now on purpose. -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From mkanat at bugzilla.org Thu Apr 6 05:48:07 2006 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:48:07 -0700 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. In-Reply-To: <44346EB3.60801@bugzilla.org> References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C732A@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> <20060406010018.GA13432@bur.st> <44346EB3.60801@bugzilla.org> Message-ID: <1144302487.3429.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 21:28 -0400, David Miller wrote: > byron jones wrote on 4/5/06 9:00 PM: > >>> buglist.cgi: -content_disposition => "$disp; filename=$filename"); > >> Just figured out there's a potential bug there - $filename should have > >> "'s around it. > > > > and encoded if it's more than 78 chars, or non-ascii. > > please research old bugs before touching this. > > It was broken on several browsers a year or two ago, and it got > researched the hell out of to find out how to do it right. If it's > broken now, someone probably reverted it on accident. Otherwise, it's > likely the way it is now on purpose. The way it is now is fine. :-) The line I pasted above is from buglist.cgi. *We* set all the filenames on buglist.cgi. attachment.cgi does the exact right thing with user-supplied filenames. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla Services. And Everything Else, too. From kevin.benton at amd.com Thu Apr 6 15:09:08 2006 From: kevin.benton at amd.com (Benton, Kevin) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:09:08 -0700 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. Message-ID: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C75D3@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 21:28 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > byron jones wrote on 4/5/06 9:00 PM: > > >>> buglist.cgi: -content_disposition => "$disp; filename=$filename"); > > >> Just figured out there's a potential bug there - $filename should > have > > >> "'s around it. > > > > > > and encoded if it's more than 78 chars, or non-ascii. > > > > please research old bugs before touching this. > > > > It was broken on several browsers a year or two ago, and it got > > researched the hell out of to find out how to do it right. If it's > > broken now, someone probably reverted it on accident. Otherwise, it's > > likely the way it is now on purpose. > > The way it is now is fine. :-) The line I pasted above is from > buglist.cgi. *We* set all the filenames on buglist.cgi. > > attachment.cgi does the exact right thing with user-supplied > filenames. The problem I see is Firefox doesn't handle filenames as desired if there's a space in a file's name unless it's wrapped in "'s. I'll test it against CVS tip and get back to you, but my experience has shown me that at least one browser is chopping the filename at the first white space character. --- Kevin Benton Perl/Bugzilla Developer/Administrator, Perforce SCM Administrator AMD - ECSD Software Validation and Tools The opinions stated in this communication do not necessarily reflect the view of Advanced Micro Devices and have not been reviewed by management. This communication may contain sensitive and/or confidential and/or proprietary information. Distribution of such information is strictly prohibited without prior consent of Advanced Micro Devices. This communication is for the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender, then destroy any remaining copies of this communication. From kevin.benton at amd.com Thu Apr 6 16:02:25 2006 From: kevin.benton at amd.com (Benton, Kevin) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:02:25 -0700 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. Message-ID: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C7658@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 21:28 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > byron jones wrote on 4/5/06 9:00 PM: > > >>> buglist.cgi: -content_disposition => "$disp; filename=$filename"); > > >> Just figured out there's a potential bug there - $filename should > have > > >> "'s around it. > > > > > > and encoded if it's more than 78 chars, or non-ascii. > > > > please research old bugs before touching this. > > > > It was broken on several browsers a year or two ago, and it got > > researched the hell out of to find out how to do it right. If it's > > broken now, someone probably reverted it on accident. Otherwise, it's > > likely the way it is now on purpose. > > The way it is now is fine. :-) The line I pasted above is from > buglist.cgi. *We* set all the filenames on buglist.cgi. > > attachment.cgi does the exact right thing with user-supplied > filenames. I agree. I tested it on http://landfill.bugzilla.org/bugzilla-tip/ in bug 3686. The attachment "Another Test" was stored as "This file.doc" and Bugzilla transmitted the name back to me properly. There is no need to change Bugzilla in any way at this time. It wouldn't be a bad idea to include this as a regression test as part of the release criteria, however. My point in sharing this originally was to pass the info along to others who may not have known how to do this before. I didn't and hadn't thought of looking at the attachment CGI code prior to learning how to do this. --- Kevin Benton Perl/Bugzilla Developer/Administrator, Perforce SCM Administrator AMD - ECSD Software Validation and Tools The opinions stated in this communication do not necessarily reflect the view of Advanced Micro Devices and have not been reviewed by management. This communication may contain sensitive and/or confidential and/or proprietary information. Distribution of such information is strictly prohibited without prior consent of Advanced Micro Devices. This communication is for the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender, then destroy any remaining copies of this communication. From cheiny at synaptics.com Thu Apr 6 21:01:40 2006 From: cheiny at synaptics.com (Christopher Heiny) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:01:40 -0700 Subject: "Auto Detect" for attachment content type. In-Reply-To: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C7658@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42056C7658@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> Message-ID: <443581B4.7050500@synaptics.com> Benton, Kevin wrote: [snip] > My point in sharing this originally was to pass the info along to others > who may not have known how to do this before. I didn't and hadn't > thought of looking at the attachment CGI code prior to learning how to > do this. And my thanks to you for it! It's been an ongoing nag in a different project of mine, and I'd never had the free time to research and fix (it's one of those critical-to-the-buisiness but not-important-enough-to-allow-in-the-schedule projects). Now that's done, and there was much rejoicing. Thanks again, Chris From lists at nabble.com Mon Apr 10 06:48:39 2006 From: lists at nabble.com (monis (sent by Nabble.com)) Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 23:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Adding a bug into the bug database through backend Message-ID: <3836797.post@talk.nabble.com> Hi all, I want to add bugs to the bugs database through the backend. Can anyone tell me what should be the query or queries to add a bug? Thank you in advance... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Adding-a-bug-into-the-bug-database-through-backend-t1423283.html#a3836797 Sent from the Bugzilla - Dev forum at Nabble.com. From lpsolit at gmail.com Mon Apr 10 11:00:29 2006 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:00:29 +0200 Subject: {Spam?} Bugzilla meeting on IRC tomorrow, Tuesday April 11, 2006 Message-ID: <443A3ACD.2090606@gmail.com> Reminder: We will meet tomorrow, Tuesday April 11, 2006 at 18:00 GMT (11:00 PST, 20:00 CET) on IRC in the #bugzilla-meeting channel. The agenda is available at: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings Everyone who is interested can attend. See you tomorrow, LpSolit From christian.masopust at siemens.com Wed Apr 12 12:43:51 2006 From: christian.masopust at siemens.com (Masopust, Christian) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:43:51 +0200 Subject: Patch to whineatnews.pl to.... Message-ID: <60721B67EAF0994EAFFB561767B700140ACD21@nets13ha.ww300.siemens.net> ... only send mail to not disabled profiles: simply change: "WHERE (bug_status = 'NEW' OR bug_status = 'REOPENED') " . "AND " . $dbh->sql_to_days('NOW()') . " - " . to: "WHERE (bug_status = 'NEW' OR bug_status = 'REOPENED') " . "AND (disabledtext = '') " . "AND " . $dbh->sql_to_days('NOW()') . " - " . any opinions to this change?? christian ___________________________________________________________ Christian Masopust SIEMENS AG PSE SMC CI E CM Tel: +43 (0) 5 1707 26866 E-mail: christian.masopust at siemens.com Addr: Austria, 1210 Vienna, Siemensstra?e 90-92, B. 34, Rm. 3057 Mailcode: ___________________________________________________________ From wurblzap at gmail.com Wed Apr 12 14:40:13 2006 From: wurblzap at gmail.com (Marc Schumann) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:40:13 +0200 Subject: Patch to whineatnews.pl to.... In-Reply-To: <60721B67EAF0994EAFFB561767B700140ACD21@nets13ha.ww300.siemens.net> References: <60721B67EAF0994EAFFB561767B700140ACD21@nets13ha.ww300.siemens.net> Message-ID: Christian, 2006/4/12, Masopust, Christian : > ... only send mail to not disabled profiles: disabling a profile is meant for disallowing logins with this account. Disabling a profile is unrelated to mail. For example, you may want to have a bot account which receives mail but may not be used interactively. You can stop mail being sent to an account by entering its address into the data/nomail file. See also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100953. Kind regards Marc -- http://wurblzap.net/ Bugzilla hosting and professional support From kevin.benton at amd.com Wed Apr 12 16:29:49 2006 From: kevin.benton at amd.com (Benton, Kevin) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:29:49 -0700 Subject: Patch to whineatnews.pl to.... Message-ID: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A4205910761@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> > Christian, > > 2006/4/12, Masopust, Christian : > > ... only send mail to not disabled profiles: > > disabling a profile is meant for disallowing logins with this account. > Disabling a profile is unrelated to mail. For example, you may want to > have a bot account which receives mail but may not be used > interactively. > > You can stop mail being sent to an account by entering its address > into the data/nomail file. See also > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100953. I think we should do this just once. I think it makes a lot more sense to do a little more work by updating checksetup.pl to change the profiles table so it includes a new field "allow_email bool default 1", then update the other files. I think users should be able to turn this value on or off themselves, but more importantly, admins should be able to modify it from their browser. By adding this to the profiles table, it removes the need for admins to have access to the file system. BTW - I've taken this bug. --- Kevin Benton Perl/Bugzilla Developer/Administrator, Perforce SCM Administrator AMD - ECSD Software Validation and Tools The opinions stated in this communication do not necessarily reflect the view of Advanced Micro Devices and have not been reviewed by management. This communication may contain sensitive and/or confidential and/or proprietary information. Distribution of such information is strictly prohibited without prior consent of Advanced Micro Devices. This communication is for the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender, then destroy any remaining copies of this communication. From lpsolit at gmail.com Mon Apr 17 19:08:56 2006 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:08:56 +0200 Subject: {Spam?} Minutes of our last Bugzilla meeting Message-ID: <4443E7C8.30705@gmail.com> Here is briefly what we discussed on Tuesday, April 11, 2006: - QA tests are all done and successful and so we can now release 2.22 and 2.20.2... as soon as our release manager has some time to do this. justdave said he would give some help to get them out asap. This also means our support for 2.16 is officially over. - Mozilla is planning to hire an additional webtools person, which would include Bugzilla, but also the addons site and the update system and bonsai/tinderbox/etc as well. - Top 5 reviewers for the last 6 months are: 1. LpSolit with 317 reviews 2. mkanat (104) 3. wicked (99) 4. vladd (58) 5. wurblzap (47) - About the roadmap, http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Roadmap : The stuff for April (removing versioncache) may or may not make it within April, but the stuff that's due in June (removing globals.pl, removing deprecated DB routines and rewriting Flag.pm) is ahead of schedule and will probably land in April or May. There has been progress on some of the later summer stuff as well. - gandalf is working on a new UI for Bugzilla 3.0, using AJAX. You can see how it looks like here: http://landfill.bugzilla.org/gandui/ This is still in progress (and AJAX isn't actually in use AFAIK). Moreover, he posted a link to the roadmap he wrote about the UI rewrite: http://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Gandalf/Draft:Bugzilla_UI If you are interested in helping to improve the UI, join us to our next Bugzilla meeting or talk to gandalf in #mozwebtools on IRC. - Several people are waiting for a Web Service API, but it requires previous items from the roadmap to be fixed first. - We plan to implement "Automatic Update Notification for Bugzilla" (bug 330487) very soon now. Bugzilla will check for new releases once per week, if this parameter is turned on, and will notify administrators when they go to index.cgi based on the option chosen: * development snapshot: latest release of the trunk (e.g. 2.23.1); * latest stable release: most recent stable release, independently of your installation (e.g. 2.22, even if you are running a 2.18.x version of Bugzilla); * latest stable release of the branch: most recent stable release based on the branch your installation is runnning on (e.g. 2.18.5 if you are running 2.18.x with x < 5)); * do not notify: Bugzilla won't check for new releases. The patch is already applied to http://landfill.bugzilla.org/notification/ You need admin privs to see something though. - Our next meeting will be on Tuesday 25th, 2006 at 18:00 GMT (11:00 PST, 20:00 CET) in #bugzilla-meeting. LpSolit From indraveni at yahoo.co.in Tue Apr 18 07:14:10 2006 From: indraveni at yahoo.co.in (Indraveni) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:14:10 +0100 (BST) Subject: Bugzilla Installation Message-ID: <20060418071410.13292.qmail@web8706.mail.in.yahoo.com> hi, I followed the steps in Bugzilla Guide and installed Bugzilla in my Linux system. And now when i am tring to access the bugzilla from localhost i.e http://lcoalhost/bugzilla i am getting an error message liket he folowing. You don't have permission to access /bugzilla/index.cgi on this server. I have done all the settings in the httpd.conf file. What may be the problem?? --------------------------------- Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From manjula_ashok at yahoo.com Tue Apr 18 07:38:00 2006 From: manjula_ashok at yahoo.com (manjula ashok) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Bugzilla Installation In-Reply-To: <20060418071410.13292.qmail@web8706.mail.in.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20060418073800.44332.qmail@web52909.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, You have to give permission in httpd.conf(Apache Server). Regards, Manjula --- Indraveni wrote: > hi, > > I followed the steps in Bugzilla Guide and > installed Bugzilla in my Linux system. And now when > i am tring to access the bugzilla from localhost i.e > http://lcoalhost/bugzilla i am getting an error > message liket he folowing. > > You don't have permission to access > /bugzilla/index.cgi on this server. > > I have done all the settings in the httpd.conf > file. > > What may be the problem?? > > > --------------------------------- > Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket > Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your > buddies all the time. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From indraveni at yahoo.co.in Tue Apr 18 07:55:43 2006 From: indraveni at yahoo.co.in (Indraveni) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:55:43 +0100 (BST) Subject: Bugzilla Installation In-Reply-To: <20060418073800.44332.qmail@web52909.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20060418075543.53944.qmail@web8712.mail.in.yahoo.com> What type of permissions should I give? I have already done the necessary settings but permissoions?? Regards Indraveni manjula ashok wrote: Hi, You have to give permission in httpd.conf(Apache Server). Regards, Manjula --- Indraveni wrote: > hi, > > I followed the steps in Bugzilla Guide and > installed Bugzilla in my Linux system. And now when > i am tring to access the bugzilla from localhost i.e > http://lcoalhost/bugzilla i am getting an error > message liket he folowing. > > You don't have permission to access > /bugzilla/index.cgi on this server. > > I have done all the settings in the httpd.conf > file. > > What may be the problem?? > > > --------------------------------- > Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket > Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your > buddies all the time. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To view or change your list settings, click here: --------------------------------- Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From manjula_ashok at yahoo.com Tue Apr 18 08:47:26 2006 From: manjula_ashok at yahoo.com (manjula ashok) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Bugzilla Installation In-Reply-To: <20060418075543.53944.qmail@web8712.mail.in.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20060418084726.81409.qmail@web52914.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, For Configuring CGI, we have to do following in the Httpd.conf file: 1. Uncomment AddHandler cgi-script .cgi line. 2. Allow .cgi scripts in the Bugzilla Directory by adding ExecCGI Options directive. Ex: Options Indexex FollowSymLinks ExecCGI. 3. Options FileInfo Authconfig Limit AllowOverride All. 4. Controls who can get stuff from this server. Order allow, deny Allow from all 5. Add index.cgi to the DirectoryIndex List DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var index.cgi Regards Manjula --- Indraveni wrote: > What type of permissions should I give? I have > already done the necessary settings but > permissoions?? > > Regards > Indraveni > manjula ashok wrote: Hi, > > You have to give permission in httpd.conf(Apache > Server). > > Regards, > Manjula > > --- Indraveni wrote: > > > hi, > > > > I followed the steps in Bugzilla Guide and > > installed Bugzilla in my Linux system. And now > when > > i am tring to access the bugzilla from localhost > i.e > > http://lcoalhost/bugzilla i am getting an error > > message liket he folowing. > > > > You don't have permission to access > > /bugzilla/index.cgi on this server. > > > > I have done all the settings in the httpd.conf > > file. > > > > What may be the problem?? > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket > > Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your > > buddies all the time. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > > > > --------------------------------- > Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket > Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your > buddies all the time. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From indraveni at yahoo.co.in Tue Apr 18 09:04:41 2006 From: indraveni at yahoo.co.in (Indraveni) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:04:41 +0100 (BST) Subject: Bugzilla Installation In-Reply-To: <20060418084726.81409.qmail@web52914.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20060418090441.69384.qmail@web8715.mail.in.yahoo.com> All this stuff is already done. still I am getting the error message as i shown. manjula ashok wrote: Hi, For Configuring CGI, we have to do following in the Httpd.conf file: 1. Uncomment AddHandler cgi-script .cgi line. 2. Allow .cgi scripts in the Bugzilla Directory by adding ExecCGI Options directive. Ex: Options Indexex FollowSymLinks ExecCGI. 3. Options FileInfo Authconfig Limit AllowOverride All. 4. Controls who can get stuff from this server. Order allow, deny Allow from all 5. Add index.cgi to the DirectoryIndex List DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var index.cgi Regards Manjula --- Indraveni wrote: > What type of permissions should I give? I have > already done the necessary settings but > permissoions?? > > Regards > Indraveni > manjula ashok wrote: Hi, > > You have to give permission in httpd.conf(Apache > Server). > > Regards, > Manjula > > --- Indraveni wrote: > > > hi, > > > > I followed the steps in Bugzilla Guide and > > installed Bugzilla in my Linux system. And now > when > > i am tring to access the bugzilla from localhost > i.e > > http://lcoalhost/bugzilla i am getting an error > > message liket he folowing. > > > > You don't have permission to access > > /bugzilla/index.cgi on this server. > > > > I have done all the settings in the httpd.conf > > file. > > > > What may be the problem?? > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket > > Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your > > buddies all the time. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > > > > --------------------------------- > Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket > Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your > buddies all the time. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To view or change your list settings, click here: --------------------------------- Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Guillaume.Rousse at inria.fr Tue Apr 18 09:14:06 2006 From: Guillaume.Rousse at inria.fr (Guillaume Rousse) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:14:06 +0200 Subject: Bugzilla Installation In-Reply-To: <20060418090441.69384.qmail@web8715.mail.in.yahoo.com> References: <20060418090441.69384.qmail@web8715.mail.in.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4444ADDE.5080404@inria.fr> Indraveni wrote: > All this stuff is already done. still I am getting the error message as > i shown. Well, this is not really a developper question, you'd better ask on users mailing-list. And you should give more details, such as apache error logs results for instance. From lpsolit at gmail.com Tue Apr 18 09:20:56 2006 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:20:56 +0200 Subject: Bugzilla Installation In-Reply-To: <20060418090441.69384.qmail@web8715.mail.in.yahoo.com> References: <20060418090441.69384.qmail@web8715.mail.in.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4444AF78.50603@gmail.com> Did you follow what is given in sections 2.2.3 and 2.2.4? http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/configuration.html#AEN529 This error message seems to indicate that you either forgot to rerun checksetup.pl after editing localconfig, or that you gave a wrong group name in localconfig, i.e. $webservergroup. Maybe you only followed steps given in http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/installation.html and didn't notice the "Configuration" chapter. LpSolit From justdave at bugzilla.org Sun Apr 23 03:22:02 2006 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:22:02 -0400 Subject: cvs web? In-Reply-To: <43AA46A5.3070109@gmx.net> References: <43AA1639.6000007@gmx.net> <43AA19DD.5070605@peshkin.net> <43AA46A5.3070109@gmx.net> Message-ID: <444AF2DA.3050304@bugzilla.org> Mick Weiss wrote on 12/22/05 1:24 AM: > Joel Peshkin wrote: > >> Mick Weiss wrote: >> >>> I was just on the download site again, and I noticed that there is no >>> way to browse cvs from the web: http://www.bugzilla.org/download/#cvs >>> >>> Is it not possible, or not listed on the site? I always find this to >>> be very useful :-) >>> >> Not exactly, but.... >> http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/webtools/bugzilla/ >> http://bonsai.mozilla.org/rview.cgi?dir=mozilla/webtools/bugzilla&cvsroot=/cvsroot > > Wouldn't that be worth adding to http://www.bugzilla.org/download/#cvs ? OK, this is done now. I'm way behind catching up on some old mail :) -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From justdave at bugzilla.org Sun Apr 23 04:13:46 2006 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 00:13:46 -0400 Subject: Adding a bug into the bug database through backend In-Reply-To: <3836797.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <3836797.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: <444AFEFA.9010605@bugzilla.org> monis (sent by Nabble.com) wrote on 4/10/06 2:48 AM: > I want to add bugs to the bugs database through the backend. > Can anyone tell me what should be the query or queries to add a bug? Look in the contrib directory for bugzilla-submit. Examining that script should help you figure out what you need. -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From jendroska at psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de Mon Apr 24 13:08:10 2006 From: jendroska at psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de (Dirk Jendroska) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:08:10 +0200 Subject: Scientific Survey: Working Conditions in Open Source Projects Message-ID: <444CCDBA.4040007@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de> We like to invite you to a survey about the working conditions in Free/Open-Source Software development. This survey is conducted by the Open-Source Research Group of the University of W?rzburg (Germany). We will compare work design in open source and proprietary software development. Our findings should be used to adjust the working conditions of software development to the needs of the developers. The results will be published under the Creative Commons License. To start the survey, please follow the link: http://www.unipark.de/uc/open-source-task/ If you have any questions don't hesitate to contact us! Dirk Jendroska http://www.psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de/ao/staff/jendroska.php?lang=en From myk at mozilla.org Mon Apr 24 18:49:26 2006 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:49:26 -0700 Subject: mozilla.dev.apps.bugzilla & developers@bugzilla.org status Message-ID: <444D1DB6.8020403@mozilla.org> What's the status of hooking up the mozilla.dev.apps.bugzilla newsgroup with the developers at bugzilla.org mailing list? It seems like the two should be mirrored, or we should pick one and use it exclusively. -myk From justdave at bugzilla.org Mon Apr 24 20:37:18 2006 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:37:18 -0400 Subject: mozilla.dev.apps.bugzilla & developers@bugzilla.org status In-Reply-To: <444D1DB6.8020403@mozilla.org> References: <444D1DB6.8020403@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <444D36FE.6080003@bugzilla.org> Myk Melez wrote on 4/24/06 2:49 PM: > What's the status of hooking up the mozilla.dev.apps.bugzilla newsgroup > with the developers at bugzilla.org mailing list? It seems like the two > should be mirrored, or we should pick one and use it exclusively. Yeah, we talked about it a couple months ago... never followed up on it. The easiest thing to do at this point would be to copy the subscriber list over to dev-apps-bugzilla and have the developers at bugzilla.org address forward to it. Another option would be to get this list to gateway to the newsgroup, but that would be a little bigger project (news gatewaying has been done with Majordomo2 before, but it's not built-in like it is on Mailman). -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/ From mkanat at bugzilla.org Mon Apr 24 22:04:09 2006 From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:04:09 -0700 Subject: mozilla.dev.apps.bugzilla & developers@bugzilla.org status In-Reply-To: <444D36FE.6080003@bugzilla.org> References: <444D1DB6.8020403@mozilla.org> <444D36FE.6080003@bugzilla.org> Message-ID: <1145916249.3370.0.camel@es-lappy> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 16:37 -0400, David Miller wrote: > Myk Melez wrote on 4/24/06 2:49 PM: > > > What's the status of hooking up the mozilla.dev.apps.bugzilla newsgroup > > with the developers at bugzilla.org mailing list? It seems like the two > > should be mirrored, or we should pick one and use it exclusively. > > Yeah, we talked about it a couple months ago... never followed up on > it. The easiest thing to do at this point would be to copy the > subscriber list over to dev-apps-bugzilla and have the > developers at bugzilla.org address forward to it. Yeah, I suppose I'd agree that's what we should do. I mean, I like the address "developers at bugzilla.org" much better than "dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org" but I suppose I can live with it. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Everything Solved: Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Linux Services From lpsolit at gmail.com Mon Apr 24 22:23:50 2006 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYyBCdWNsaW4=?=) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:23:50 +0200 Subject: mozilla.dev.apps.bugzilla & developers@bugzilla.org status In-Reply-To: <1145916249.3370.0.camel@es-lappy> References: <444D1DB6.8020403@mozilla.org> <444D36FE.6080003@bugzilla.org> <1145916249.3370.0.camel@es-lappy> Message-ID: <444D4FF6.9010102@gmail.com> > Yeah, I suppose I'd agree that's what we should do. I mean, I like the > address "developers at bugzilla.org" much better than > "dev-apps-bugzilla at lists.mozilla.org" but I suppose I can live with it. I also much prefer developers at bugzilla.org, and I cannot live without it. ;) i don't want to update my email filters too. :) LpSolit From lpsolit at gmail.com Mon Apr 24 22:56:43 2006 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:56:43 +0200 Subject: Bugzilla meeting on IRC tomorrow, Tuesday 25th at 18:00 GMT (11:00 PST) Message-ID: <444D57AB.7060406@gmail.com> Reminder: We will meet again tomorrow at 18:00 GMT for a new Bugzilla meeting. The channel is #bugzilla-meeting on irc.mozilla.org. As usual, the agenda is available at: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Meetings Feel free to add new items to it that you would like to discuss (in this case, try to attend ;)). Everyone is free to attend and... and... Bugzilla 2.22 has been released! :) See you tomorrow, LpSolit From gerv at mozilla.org Fri Apr 28 10:10:44 2006 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:10:44 +0100 Subject: [Fwd: NATO uses Bugzilla] Message-ID: <4451EA24.5060109@mozilla.org> Cool, huh? :-) Gerv -------- Original Message -------- Subject: NATO uses Bugzilla Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:48:07 +0200 From: De Smet Bram To: *Classification: NATO UNCLASSIFIED (Releasable for Internet Transmission)* Hi, I just wanted to inform you that I managed to push Bugzilla inside NATO Headquarters in Brussels. You can add it to the list if you want. There is no link to it since it's for internal usage only. Regards, Bram --- N: Bram De Smet O: NATO HQ D: ISMS E: desmet.bram at hq.nato.int T: +32 (0)2 707.41.70 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer. From bugzilla at joostdevalk.nl Fri Apr 28 10:19:16 2006 From: bugzilla at joostdevalk.nl (Joost de Valk) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:19:16 +0200 Subject: [Fwd: NATO uses Bugzilla] In-Reply-To: <4451EA24.5060109@mozilla.org> References: <4451EA24.5060109@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <4451EC24.9050407@joostdevalk.nl> Pretty damn cool indeed :) Gervase Markham wrote: > Cool, huh? :-) > > Gerv > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: NATO uses Bugzilla > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:48:07 +0200 > From: De Smet Bram > To: > > > > *Classification: NATO UNCLASSIFIED (Releasable for Internet Transmission)* > > Hi, > > I just wanted to inform you that I managed to push Bugzilla inside NATO > Headquarters in Brussels. > You can add it to the list if you want. There is no link to it since > it's for internal usage only. > > Regards, > > Bram > > --- > N: Bram De Smet > O: NATO HQ > D: ISMS > E: desmet.bram at hq.nato.int > T: +32 (0)2 707.41.70 > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the > material from your computer. > > > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > From Guillaume.Rousse at inria.fr Fri Apr 28 11:37:35 2006 From: Guillaume.Rousse at inria.fr (Guillaume Rousse) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:37:35 +0200 Subject: [Fwd: NATO uses Bugzilla] In-Reply-To: <4451EC24.9050407@joostdevalk.nl> References: <4451EA24.5060109@mozilla.org> <4451EC24.9050407@joostdevalk.nl> Message-ID: <4451FE7F.30900@inria.fr> Joost de Valk wrote: > Pretty damn cool indeed :) If you consider than it's 'cool' to contribute to a military organisation, of course... From jochen.wiedmann at gmail.com Fri Apr 28 11:39:23 2006 From: jochen.wiedmann at gmail.com (Jochen Wiedmann) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:39:23 +0200 Subject: A good laugh Message-ID: Just in case you have missed: http://eclipsewebmaster.blogspot.com/2006/04/bugzilla-sql-rocket-science.html (Obviously, that guy cannot imagine that dynamic queries can be strange sometimes.) -- Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. (Mark Twain) From lpsolit at gmail.com Fri Apr 28 12:04:15 2006 From: lpsolit at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?=) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:04:15 +0200 Subject: A good laugh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <445204BF.4070601@gmail.com> > http://eclipsewebmaster.blogspot.com/2006/04/bugzilla-sql-rocket-science.html > > > (Obviously, that guy cannot imagine that dynamic queries can be > strange sometimes.) He already reported bug 335522 about this question. And as one of the commenters said already, we use these queries to make sure a bug exists. Simply ignore this message. LpSolit