From justdave at bugzilla.org  Sun May  1 02:55:17 2005
From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:55:17 -0400
Subject: UI Simplification
In-Reply-To: <1114892831.10167.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1114891575.8764.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114892831.10167.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <42744515.3020707@bugzilla.org>

Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 21:06 +0100, Jon Wood wrote:
> 
>>Would people be interested in merging some of these changes into the
>>main release,
> 
> 	Yes! :-) Do read the Contributor's Guide on the bugzilla.org web site.
> There's a link from the "Developer Resources" page.

Just to point out, we're planning to have some UI Hack-A-Thons on IRC 
starting after we branch for 2.20 (which should be soon now hopefully). 
  Be sure to show up and participate in that, too! :)

There will be more details forthcoming when the date for the first one 
is nailed down.

-- 
Dave Miller                                   http://www.justdave.net/
System Administrator, Mozilla Foundation       http://www.mozilla.org/
Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System  http://www.bugzilla.org/


From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Sun May  1 05:33:32 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:33:32 -0700
Subject: UI Simplification
In-Reply-To: <42744515.3020707@bugzilla.org>
References: <1114891575.8764.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1114892831.10167.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <42744515.3020707@bugzilla.org>
Message-ID: <1114925613.10991.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 22:55 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> [snip]we're planning to have some UI Hack-A-Thons on IRC 
> starting after we branch for 2.20 (which should be soon now hopefully). 
>   Be sure to show up and participate in that, too! :)

	Yeah, and just to make things totally clear -- myk is the UI component
owner, so of course it will be his say whether or not the changes go in.
I was just voicing my approval of the whole idea of contributing. :-D

	(And yeah, I also liked the UI change, personally. :-) )

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From chicks at chicks.net  Sun May  1 14:23:29 2005
From: chicks at chicks.net (Christopher Hicks)
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 10:23:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: UI Simplification
In-Reply-To: <1114891575.8764.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1114891575.8764.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505011022370.12050@skippy.fini.net>

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Jon Wood wrote:

> The biggest changes have been made to the bug reporting page at the 
> moment, where I have shifted half of the inputs down to a section 
> labelled "Developer Settings", explaining to users that they probably 
> don't need to worry about those ones.

This looks great.  Bravo.  But I would think severity would be something 
that users could generally pick intelligently.

-- 
</chris>

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)


From kevin.benton at amd.com  Tue May  3 16:28:45 2005
From: kevin.benton at amd.com (Benton, Kevin)
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 09:28:45 -0700
Subject: FW: collectstats permission problem
Message-ID: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42EFED05@ssvlexmb2.amd.com>

This brings up a good point - there are users who don't want
checksetup.pl to force permission changes.  I think we ought to ask if
the user wants to change permissions.  If not, then we ought to leave
them alone.

---
Kevin Benton
Perl/Bugzilla Developer
Advanced Micro Devices
 
The opinions stated in this communication do not necessarily reflect the
view of Advanced Micro Devices and have not been reviewed by management.
This communication may contain sensitive and/or confidential and/or
proprietary information.  Distribution of such information is strictly
prohibited without prior consent of Advanced Micro Devices.  This
communication is for the intended recipient(s) only.  If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender, then
destroy any remaining copies of this communication.
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mozilla-webtools-admin at mozilla.org [mailto:mozilla-webtools-
> admin at mozilla.org] On Behalf Of K.Godsoe
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:13 AM
> To: mozilla-webtools at mozilla.org
> Subject: Re: collectstats permission problem
> 
> Brett,
>     I cheated to make this work.  I created a script that would be run
by
> cron, this script would check file permissions, and if they were not
set
> correctly, it would set them for me.  The reason I check permissions
is
> incase one of the other admins re-ran checksetup.pl it would reset
> permissions on the file.After the psmission check I had the script
change
> to
> the directory where I have my bugzilla install
> (/usr/local/www/html/zilla/)
> and I have it
> running the whineatnews.pl, collectstats.pl, and whineatnews2.pl.
That
> seemed to fix my issues with the permission denied messages.   hope it
> helps.
> 
> -Kris
> 
> "Brett" <bg at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:RcydnYAjaZ3CMOvfRVn-pQ at adelphia.com...
> > "Brett" <bg at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:ZYKdncCAH5dI7PPfRVn-vw at adelphia.com...
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am using bugzilla 2.18 and my checksetup.pl passes fine.
> >>
> >> I can run collectstats.pl on the command line OK. But everyday I
> receive
> > an
> >> email from cron with the following message:
> >>
> >> /etc/cron.daily/bugzilla:
> >> /usr/share/bugzilla/collectstats.pl: ./data/mining/-All-,
Permission
> > denied
> >> /usr/share/bugzilla/collectstats.pl: ./data/mining/Project1,
Permission
> >> denied
> >> /usr/share/bugzilla/collectstats.pl: ./data/mining/Project2,
Permission
> >> denied
> >> /usr/share/bugzilla/collectstats.pl: ./data/mining/Project3.,
> Permission
> >> denied
> >> /usr/share/bugzilla/collectstats.pl: ./data/mining/Project4,
Permission
> >> denied
> >> Can't open DBM dupes file: No such file or directory at
> >> /usr/share/bugzilla/collectstats.pl line 202.
> >> run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/bugzilla exited with return code 2
> >>
> >> The permission for these files is 644 with owner and group as
www-data
> >>
> >> Can anyone tellme what the problem is?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Brett.
> >
> > Some further information...
> >
> > CollectStats.pl is being run as a perl job under the
cron.daily/bugzilla
> > cron job. I've read otherwhere that this has to be run as a cron
job,
> does
> > it have to be run in addition to this job?
> >
> > the permissions on all the files are 644 with both the owner/group
as
> > www-data.
> >
> > Is anyone able to help me?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brett
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mozilla-webtools mailing list
> mozilla-webtools at mozilla.org
> http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-webtools





From luis.villa at gmail.com  Tue May  3 16:31:44 2005
From: luis.villa at gmail.com (Luis Villa)
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:31:44 -0400
Subject: [Fwd: talks/slides, random stuff]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504251031420.17927@skippy.fini.net>
References: <426C7BA8.8000104@bugzilla.org>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504251031420.17927@skippy.fini.net>
Message-ID: <2cb10c44050503093148ac779d@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/25/05, Christopher Hicks <chicks at chicks.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, David Miller wrote:
> > Good stuff in here.
> 
> Agreed.  We need to start a donations drive for Luis' bandwidth.

Eep, was it slow? It's on a very, very fat pipe (and free, thankfully)...
Luis (who only now realized he hasn't checked this list in weeks, blah
for bad filtering)



From dwilliss at microimages.com  Tue May  3 17:01:07 2005
From: dwilliss at microimages.com (Dave Williss)
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:01:07 -0500
Subject: Mid-Air collissions and comments
Message-ID: <43cd01c55001$b305fa70$4b00000a@opus2>

Why does just adding a comment to a bug that's changed since you started
entering the comment have to trigger the "mid air collision" warning?  Can't
it just add the new comment?


 -- Dave Williss
------
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons,
   for you are crunchy and taste good with catsup



From vladd at bugzilla.org  Tue May  3 17:14:13 2005
From: vladd at bugzilla.org (Vlad Dascalu)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 20:14:13 +0300
Subject: Mid-Air collissions and comments
In-Reply-To: <43cd01c55001$b305fa70$4b00000a@opus2>
References: <43cd01c55001$b305fa70$4b00000a@opus2>
Message-ID: <4277B165.5070504@bugzilla.org>

Maybe you wanted to add something that just got posted by someone else.

Dave Williss wrote:

> Why does just adding a comment to a bug that's changed since you started
> entering the comment have to trigger the "mid air collision" warning?  
> Can't
> it just add the new comment?
>
>
> -- Dave Williss
> ------
> Meddle not in the affairs of dragons,
>   for you are crunchy and taste good with catsup
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=vladd at bugzilla.org>
>
>



From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Tue May  3 17:20:35 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 10:20:35 -0700
Subject: FW: collectstats permission problem
In-Reply-To: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42EFED05@ssvlexmb2.amd.com>
References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42EFED05@ssvlexmb2.amd.com>
Message-ID: <1115140835.14545.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:28 -0700, Benton, Kevin wrote:
> I think we ought to ask if the user wants to change permissions. 

	One of checksetup's requirements is that it ought to run unattended
after the first run.

	We could provide a switch to skip the permissions changes, though, or a
localconfig var.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From bugreport at peshkin.net  Tue May  3 17:28:55 2005
From: bugreport at peshkin.net (Joel Peshkin)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 10:28:55 -0700
Subject: FW: collectstats permission problem
In-Reply-To: <1115140835.14545.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42EFED05@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> <1115140835.14545.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <4277B4D7.5050509@peshkin.net>

Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:

>On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:28 -0700, Benton, Kevin wrote:
>  
>
>>I think we ought to ask if the user wants to change permissions. 
>>    
>>
>
>	One of checksetup's requirements is that it ought to run unattended
>after the first run.
>
>	We could provide a switch to skip the permissions changes, though, or a
>localconfig var.
>  
>
We already have the "silent" mechanism.  We could add to that.



From chicks at chicks.net  Wed May  4 11:51:04 2005
From: chicks at chicks.net (Christopher Hicks)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 07:51:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [Fwd: talks/slides, random stuff]
In-Reply-To: <2cb10c44050503093148ac779d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <426C7BA8.8000104@bugzilla.org>  <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504251031420.17927@skippy.fini.net>
 <2cb10c44050503093148ac779d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505040748560.12050@skippy.fini.net>

On Tue, 3 May 2005, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 4/25/05, Christopher Hicks <chicks at chicks.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, David Miller wrote:
>>> Good stuff in here.
>> Agreed.  We need to start a donations drive for Luis' bandwidth.
> Eep, was it slow? It's on a very, very fat pipe (and free, 
> thankfully)... Luis (who only now realized he hasn't checked this list 
> in weeks, blah for bad filtering)

You said in several places you would do more if you weren't paying for 
every bit and this is interesting analysis I'd like to see pushed further. 
I've since realized that it might make more sense to run the bandwidth 
intensive parts on a computer off-site.  Is that practical?

-- 
</chris>

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)


From luis.villa at gmail.com  Wed May  4 13:05:32 2005
From: luis.villa at gmail.com (Luis Villa)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 09:05:32 -0400
Subject: [Fwd: talks/slides, random stuff]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505040748560.12050@skippy.fini.net>
References: <426C7BA8.8000104@bugzilla.org>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504251031420.17927@skippy.fini.net>
	 <2cb10c44050503093148ac779d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505040748560.12050@skippy.fini.net>
Message-ID: <2cb10c44050504060575e0ad40@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/4/05, Christopher Hicks <chicks at chicks.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On 4/25/05, Christopher Hicks <chicks at chicks.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, David Miller wrote:
> >>> Good stuff in here.
> >> Agreed.  We need to start a donations drive for Luis' bandwidth.
> > Eep, was it slow? It's on a very, very fat pipe (and free,
> > thankfully)... Luis (who only now realized he hasn't checked this list
> > in weeks, blah for bad filtering)
> 
> You said in several places you would do more if you weren't paying for
> every bit and this is interesting analysis I'd like to see pushed further.
> I've since realized that it might make more sense to run the bandwidth
> intensive parts on a computer off-site.  Is that practical?

Oh, oh... that was because I was in a hotel room in Australia at the
time :) I'm home now, and the only constraint is my free time. The
biggest constraint is data access- I can run pretty sophisticated
stuff on the database I have access to, but I can't touch most
bugzillas, obviously.

Luis



From chicks at chicks.net  Wed May  4 13:14:44 2005
From: chicks at chicks.net (Christopher Hicks)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 09:14:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [Fwd: talks/slides, random stuff]
In-Reply-To: <2cb10c44050504060575e0ad40@mail.gmail.com>
References: <426C7BA8.8000104@bugzilla.org>  <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504251031420.17927@skippy.fini.net>
  <2cb10c44050503093148ac779d@mail.gmail.com>  <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505040748560.12050@skippy.fini.net>
 <2cb10c44050504060575e0ad40@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505040913170.12050@skippy.fini.net>

On Wed, 4 May 2005, Luis Villa wrote:
> Oh, oh... that was because I was in a hotel room in Australia at the 
> time :) I'm home now, and the only constraint is my free time.

OK!  Good, good.  I'm glad you're not on metered net.  :)

> The biggest constraint is data access- I can run pretty sophisticated 
> stuff on the database I have access to, but I can't touch most 
> bugzillas, obviously.

Maybe we need to get a script into the core that will (with opt-in) submit 
statistical information to a central site.

-- 
</chris>

"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)


From sukria at sukria.net  Wed May  4 15:19:39 2005
From: sukria at sukria.net (Alexis Sukrieh)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 17:19:39 +0200
Subject: Bugzilla 2.18 is in sarge.
Message-ID: <20050504151938.GB12634@sukria.net>

Hello Bugzilla developers :)

For those who are interested in the Debian stuff, I just drop this email
here to anounce that sarge will come with bugzilla 2.18.

Keep the good work :)

PS. I'm still around some times, looking at the bugs bound to my meta
bug about Debian patches:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280179

-- 
                                  Alexis Sukrieh <sukria at sukria.net>
                                               http://www.sukria.net

? Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. ? 
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.


From justdave at bugzilla.org  Wed May  4 15:41:54 2005
From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller)
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 11:41:54 -0400
Subject: Bugzilla 2.18 is in sarge.
In-Reply-To: <20050504151938.GB12634@sukria.net>
References: <20050504151938.GB12634@sukria.net>
Message-ID: <4278ED42.10009@bugzilla.org>

Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Hello Bugzilla developers :)
> 
> For those who are interested in the Debian stuff, I just drop this email
> here to anounce that sarge will come with bugzilla 2.18.
> 
> Keep the good work :)

I'll also point out for those that haven't been following Debian stuff 
that as of last week, Alexis is actually the official maintainer of the 
Bugzilla package in Debian now.  Congratulations on that as well!  I'm 
certainly excited to see some real progress on improving the package 
again :)

-- 
Dave Miller                                   http://www.justdave.net/
System Administrator, Mozilla Foundation       http://www.mozilla.org/
Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System  http://www.bugzilla.org/


From judevries at novell.com  Wed May  4 17:30:30 2005
From: judevries at novell.com (Justin C. De Vries)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 11:30:30 -0600
Subject: Reporting on keywords
Message-ID: <200505041130.30682.judevries@novell.com>

I have been asked this question several times and I'm not sure what the answer 
is, so I thought I would go to the experts. The question is: Can you select 
keywords as an axis in the graphical or CSV reports? It is not currently an 
option, but I would like see if it is possible to make it an option. Any help 
would be greatly appriciated. Thanks.

Justin


From dwilliss at microimages.com  Wed May  4 19:49:29 2005
From: dwilliss at microimages.com (Dave Williss)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 14:49:29 -0500
Subject: Adding an operation system to the op_sys list (2.19)
Message-ID: <4b8401c550e2$67cac4a0$4b00000a@opus2>

In Bugzilla 2.19, the op_sys field in the bugs table is an enum.
How do I add an opsys? I need to add "Mac OS X 10.4".
There's no CGI way that I can see to do it.  Presumably, if
I knew the SQL syntax for it, I could change it, but I've never
used enums myself.

 -- Dave Williss
------
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, 
   for you are crunchy and taste good with catsup
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20050504/142969d2/attachment.html>

From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Wed May  4 20:32:00 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:32:00 -0700
Subject: Adding an operation system to the op_sys list (2.19)
In-Reply-To: <4b8401c550e2$67cac4a0$4b00000a@opus2>
References: <4b8401c550e2$67cac4a0$4b00000a@opus2>
Message-ID: <1115238720.5389.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 14:49 -0500, Dave Williss wrote:
> In Bugzilla 2.19, the op_sys field in the bugs table is an enum.
> How do I add an opsys? I need to add "Mac OS X 10.4".
> There's no CGI way that I can see to do it.  Presumably, if
> I knew the SQL syntax for it, I could change it, but I've never
> used enums myself.

	You can change localconfig. Watch out though... I've heard reports from
people of their enums being eaten when they change them.

	In versions after 2.19.2, it's possible to do this from the Admin GUI
instead.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Wed May  4 20:57:21 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:57:21 -0700
Subject: ACTUAL landfill downtime
Message-ID: <1115240241.5389.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>

	OK, landfill will be down sometime this afternoon for an OS and
hardware upgrade. :-)

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From justdave at bugzilla.org  Wed May  4 23:32:28 2005
From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller)
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 19:32:28 -0400
Subject: Adding an operation system to the op_sys list (2.19)
In-Reply-To: <1115238720.5389.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <4b8401c550e2$67cac4a0$4b00000a@opus2> <1115238720.5389.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <42795B8C.2010808@bugzilla.org>

Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 14:49 -0500, Dave Williss wrote:
> 
>>In Bugzilla 2.19, the op_sys field in the bugs table is an enum.
>>How do I add an opsys? I need to add "Mac OS X 10.4".
>>There's no CGI way that I can see to do it.  Presumably, if
>>I knew the SQL syntax for it, I could change it, but I've never
>>used enums myself.
> 
> 	You can change localconfig. Watch out though... I've heard reports from
> people of their enums being eaten when they change them.

If you're adding one you're safe.  It's removing and renaming that cause 
weird problems if you aren't careful.

Change the list in localconfig, then run checksetup.pl to apply it to 
the database.

There really is no such thing as renaming one with the enum system. 
You're deleting it and re-adding with a different name.  So if you want 
to rename one, you have to add the new name first, then run 
checksetup.pl, then either run an SQL query or a mass change from the 
query page to change all of the old name to the new one, then go back 
and remove the old one from localconfig and run checksetup.pl again to 
remove it from the DB.

The main hangup here is if you remove one that's actually in use, it'll 
change that field to NULL in all the bugs that use it, which will trip 
up Bugzilla.

-- 
Dave Miller                                   http://www.justdave.net/
System Administrator, Mozilla Foundation       http://www.mozilla.org/
Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System  http://www.bugzilla.org/


From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Thu May  5 06:12:14 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 23:12:14 -0700
Subject: Extended landfill downtime
Message-ID: <1115273534.8901.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>

	So, there were some complications in the hard drive upgrade for
landfill (surprise, surprise -- nothing *ever* goes wrong with
*computers*), so it probably won't be back up again until some time
Thursday.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From jpyeron at pdinc.us  Thu May  5 13:25:53 2005
From: jpyeron at pdinc.us (Jason Pyeron)
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 09:25:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: template toolkit and the user's ip address
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505050924260.8612@ns.pyerotechnics.com>



How can I display the IP address of the user in TT?

In particular for :

  template/en/default/account/auth/login.html.tmpl

-Jason

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Partner & Sr. Manager             7 West 24th Street #100     -
- +1 (410) 808-6646 (c)             Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you 
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and 
notify the sender immediately.  Any other use of the email by you 
is prohibited.


From gerv at mozilla.org  Fri May  6 18:37:30 2005
From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham)
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 19:37:30 +0100
Subject: Reporting on keywords
In-Reply-To: <200505041130.30682.judevries@novell.com>
References: <200505041130.30682.judevries@novell.com>
Message-ID: <427BB96A.4060204@mozilla.org>

Justin C. De Vries wrote:
> I have been asked this question several times and I'm not sure what the answer 
> is, so I thought I would go to the experts. The question is: Can you select 
> keywords as an axis in the graphical or CSV reports? It is not currently an 
> option, but I would like see if it is possible to make it an option. Any help 
> would be greatly appriciated. Thanks.

You can't. It was once possible, but it got removed because there were 
bugs. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179581 about 
having it reinstated.

Gerv


From justdave at bugzilla.org  Fri May  6 18:48:50 2005
From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller)
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 14:48:50 -0400
Subject: template toolkit and the user's ip address
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505050924260.8612@ns.pyerotechnics.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505050924260.8612@ns.pyerotechnics.com>
Message-ID: <427BBC12.4050105@bugzilla.org>

Jason Pyeron wrote:

> How can I display the IP address of the user in TT?
> 
> In particular for :
> 
>  template/en/default/account/auth/login.html.tmpl

[% USE Bugzilla %]   (if it isn't already doing that)
[% cgi = Bugzilla.cgi %]
[% ipaddr = cgi.remote_host() %]

Note that if you have "HostnameLookups On" in your httpd.conf that this 
will give you a hostname instead of an IP address (if the address has a 
reverse-DNS), but that's usually off in most Apache configs these days.

-- 
Dave Miller                                   http://www.justdave.net/
System Administrator, Mozilla Foundation       http://www.mozilla.org/
Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System  http://www.bugzilla.org/


From jpyeron at pdinc.us  Fri May  6 19:34:37 2005
From: jpyeron at pdinc.us (Jason Pyeron)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 15:34:37 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: template toolkit and the user's ip address
In-Reply-To: <427BBC12.4050105@bugzilla.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505050924260.8612@ns.pyerotechnics.com>
 <427BBC12.4050105@bugzilla.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505061533200.1570@ns.pyerotechnics.com>


thanks, solves my problem, the ip address IS changing every minute or so..

is this worthy of a bug report?


Index: login.html.tmpl
===================================================================
RCS file: 
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/account/auth/login.html.tmpl,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 login.html.tmpl
--- login.html.tmpl     24 Jul 2004 02:18:45 -0000      1.10
+++ login.html.tmpl     6 May 2005 19:32:56 -0000
@@ -75,8 +75,9 @@
         <td align="right">
           <b>
              Restrict this session<br>
-             to this IP address:
+             to this IP address:<br>
           </b>
+             ([% USE Bugzilla %][% Bugzilla.cgi.remote_host() %])
         </td>
         <td>
           <input type="checkbox" name="Bugzilla_restrictlogin"


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Partner & Sr. Manager             7 West 24th Street #100     -
- +1 (410) 808-6646 (c)             Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you 
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and 
notify the sender immediately.  Any other use of the email by you 
is prohibited.


From wurblzap at gmail.com  Fri May  6 20:49:43 2005
From: wurblzap at gmail.com (Marc Schumann)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 22:49:43 +0200
Subject: template toolkit and the user's ip address
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505061533200.1570@ns.pyerotechnics.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505050924260.8612@ns.pyerotechnics.com>
	 <427BBC12.4050105@bugzilla.org>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505061533200.1570@ns.pyerotechnics.com>
Message-ID: <d1fcc0fc050506134977077f4e@mail.gmail.com>

Good idea imho.

On 5/6/05, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote:
>            <b>
>               Restrict this session<br>
> -             to this IP address:
> +             to this IP address:<br>
>            </b>
> +             ([% USE Bugzilla %][% Bugzilla.cgi.remote_host() %])

-- 
http://wurblzap.net/
Bugzilla hosting and professional support



From kiko at async.com.br  Fri May  6 21:13:15 2005
From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 18:13:15 -0300
Subject: template toolkit and the user's ip address
In-Reply-To: <d1fcc0fc050506134977077f4e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505050924260.8612@ns.pyerotechnics.com> <427BBC12.4050105@bugzilla.org> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505061533200.1570@ns.pyerotechnics.com> <d1fcc0fc050506134977077f4e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20050506211315.GI19073@www.async.com.br>

On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:49:43PM +0200, Marc Schumann wrote:
> Good idea imho.

Yeah, should be posted to a bug and reviewed.

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125


From judevries at novell.com  Fri May  6 22:15:28 2005
From: judevries at novell.com (Justin C. De Vries)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:15:28 -0600
Subject: Reporting on keywords
In-Reply-To: <427BB96A.4060204@mozilla.org>
References: <200505041130.30682.judevries@novell.com> <427BB96A.4060204@mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <200505061615.29034.judevries@novell.com>

On Friday 06 May 2005 12:37 pm, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Justin C. De Vries wrote:
> > I have been asked this question several times and I'm not sure what the
> > answer is, so I thought I would go to the experts. The question is: Can
> > you select keywords as an axis in the graphical or CSV reports? It is not
> > currently an option, but I would like see if it is possible to make it an
> > option. Any help would be greatly appriciated. Thanks.
>
> You can't. It was once possible, but it got removed because there were
> bugs. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179581 about
> having it reinstated.

Thanks Gerv. I may have to take a look at the old patch to see if I can work 
out the bugs. This is becoming quite an issue for us.

Justin


From kevin.benton at amd.com  Sat May  7 00:07:42 2005
From: kevin.benton at amd.com (Benton, Kevin)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 17:07:42 -0700
Subject: template toolkit and the user's imp address
Message-ID: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42EFF1E4@ssvlexmb2.amd.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org
[mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org]
> On Behalf Of Marc Schumann
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:50 PM
> To: developers at bugzilla.org
> Subject: Re: template toolkit and the user's ip address
> 
> Good idea imho.
> 
> On 5/6/05, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote:
> >            <b>
> >               Restrict this session<br>
> > -             to this IP address:
> > +             to this IP address:<br>
> >            </b>
> > +             ([% USE Bugzilla %][% Bugzilla.cgi.remote_host() %])

/me concurs.

---
Kevin Benton
Perl/Bugzilla Developer
Advanced Micro Devices
 
The opinions stated in this communication do not necessarily reflect the
view of Advanced Micro Devices and have not been reviewed by management.
This communication may contain sensitive and/or confidential and/or
proprietary information.  Distribution of such information is strictly
prohibited without prior consent of Advanced Micro Devices.  This
communication is for the intended recipient(s) only.  If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender, then
destroy any remaining copies of this communication.




From jpyeron at pdinc.us  Sat May  7 00:35:11 2005
From: jpyeron at pdinc.us (Jason Pyeron)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 20:35:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: template toolkit and the user's imp address
In-Reply-To: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42EFF1E4@ssvlexmb2.amd.com>
References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42EFF1E4@ssvlexmb2.amd.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505062035010.5052@ns.pyerotechnics.com>

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293208

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Partner & Sr. Manager             7 West 24th Street #100     -
- +1 (410) 808-6646 (c)             Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you 
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and 
notify the sender immediately.  Any other use of the email by you 
is prohibited.


From luis.villa at gmail.com  Tue May 10 15:27:30 2005
From: luis.villa at gmail.com (Luis Villa)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:27:30 -0400
Subject: user roles?
Message-ID: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>

Hey-
Has anyone given thought to the notion of user roles in bugzilla? It
strikes me that often in gnome, we want different default
behaviors/queries/appearances depending on whether or not someone is a
developer, bug filer, full-time QA person, manager, etc.; and while we
wouldn't want to sacrifice the full-blown power of the query or bug
interfaces, hiding them deeply (or having sane defaults) for
developers, non-developers, etc. would make a lot of sense. Anyone?
Bueller?

Luis



From ghendricks at novell.com  Tue May 10 15:31:36 2005
From: ghendricks at novell.com (Greg Hendricks)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:31:36 -0600
Subject: user roles?
In-Reply-To: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <200505100931.36837.ghendricks@novell.com>

On Tuesday 10 May 2005 09:27, Luis Villa wrote:
> Hey-
> Has anyone given thought to the notion of user roles in bugzilla? It
> strikes me that often in gnome, we want different default
> behaviors/queries/appearances depending on whether or not someone is a
> developer, bug filer, full-time QA person, manager, etc.; and while we
> wouldn't want to sacrifice the full-blown power of the query or bug
> interfaces, hiding them deeply (or having sane defaults) for
> developers, non-developers, etc. would make a lot of sense. Anyone?
> Bueller?
>
> Luis
>

I think that is a wonderful idea. 

We have a lot of users who are managers, for instance, who use reporting 
almost exclusively. Then there are the help desk people who do a majority of 
entering the bugs. Then the developers who work on the bugs. And then there 
are the testers that verify the bugs. 
We are already working up a custom interface for customers to enter bugs.

Having custom interfaces for these roles would be useful IMHO.

Greg Hendricks


From gerv at mozilla.org  Tue May 10 16:27:22 2005
From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 17:27:22 +0100
Subject: user roles?
In-Reply-To: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4280E0EA.3040103@mozilla.org>

Luis Villa wrote:
> Hey-
> Has anyone given thought to the notion of user roles in bugzilla? It
> strikes me that often in gnome, we want different default
> behaviors/queries/appearances depending on whether or not someone is a
> developer, bug filer, full-time QA person, manager, etc.; and while we
> wouldn't want to sacrifice the full-blown power of the query or bug
> interfaces, hiding them deeply (or having sane defaults) for
> developers, non-developers, etc. would make a lot of sense. Anyone?

Well, we already have a groups system, of course.

Two ideas: you could either just wrap bits of template in [% IF 
UserInGroup('developer') %] on a per-installation basis (which is the 
most flexible scheme, and doesn't require any base changes), or you 
could have some sort of automatic group-to-format mapping mechanism, 
such that if a format was not expressly specified, Bugzilla looked for a 
format named after any of a user's groups, in a given order.

Gerv


From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Tue May 10 16:44:32 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:44:32 -0700
Subject: user roles?
In-Reply-To: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1115743472.5399.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:27 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> Hey-
> Has anyone given thought to the notion of user roles in bugzilla? [snip]

	I have plans to implement something like this for 2.22 (aka 3.0):

	https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282282
	https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147276

	Of course, if anybody else would like to hack on it, it would be *even
more* likely to get done. :-)

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From bugreport at peshkin.net  Tue May 10 16:50:07 2005
From: bugreport at peshkin.net (Joel Peshkin)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:50:07 -0700
Subject: user roles?
In-Reply-To: <4280E0EA.3040103@mozilla.org>
References: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com> <4280E0EA.3040103@mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <4280E63F.9050702@peshkin.net>

Gervase Markham wrote:

> Luis Villa wrote:
>
>> Hey-
>> Has anyone given thought to the notion of user roles in bugzilla? It
>> strikes me that often in gnome, we want different default
>> behaviors/queries/appearances depending on whether or not someone is a
>> developer, bug filer, full-time QA person, manager, etc.; and while we
>> wouldn't want to sacrifice the full-blown power of the query or bug
>> interfaces, hiding them deeply (or having sane defaults) for
>> developers, non-developers, etc. would make a lot of sense. Anyone?
>
>
> Well, we already have a groups system, of course.
>
> Two ideas: you could either just wrap bits of template in [% IF 
> UserInGroup('developer') %] on a per-installation basis (which is the 
> most flexible scheme, and doesn't require any base changes), or you 
> could have some sort of automatic group-to-format mapping mechanism, 
> such that if a format was not expressly specified, Bugzilla looked for 
> a format named after any of a user's groups, in a given order.
>
> Gerv
> -
>
You can also set the defaults for a user based on the role and then use 
bug 262592 to permit the user to override the simplification and 
remember the state of that override using a cookie.

-Joel



From myk at mozilla.org  Tue May 10 19:22:59 2005
From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 12:22:59 -0700
Subject: user roles?
In-Reply-To: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2cb10c4405051008271ca6bc23@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <42810A13.3010500@mozilla.org>

Luis Villa wrote:

>Hey-
>Has anyone given thought to the notion of user roles in bugzilla?
>
There's some thinking in bug 173127:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173127

Also see bug 31144:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31144

-myk



From Doug at Royer.com  Wed May 11 01:16:37 2005
From: Doug at Royer.com (Doug Royer)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 19:16:37 -0600
Subject: PostgreSQL Support Ready For Testing
In-Reply-To: <1114600770.8830.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1114600770.8830.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <42815CF5.4090402@Royer.com>


Does this installation upgrade from MYSQL ?

Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> 	Hello! As of today's CVS version, Bugzilla's PostgreSQL support is
> ready for beta testing. There are still some known bugs -- see the
> blockers on bug 98304 for details.
> ....

-- 

Doug Royer                     | http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------

               We Do Standards - You Need Standards

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Doug.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20050510/6675fdcf/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4696 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20050510/6675fdcf/attachment.bin>

From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Wed May 11 01:51:11 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 18:51:11 -0700
Subject: PostgreSQL Support Ready For Testing
In-Reply-To: <42815CF5.4090402@Royer.com>
References: <1114600770.8830.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <42815CF5.4090402@Royer.com>
Message-ID: <1115776271.6864.42.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 19:16 -0600, Doug Royer wrote:
> Does this installation upgrade from MYSQL ?

	No, but I have written a script to copy a MySQL Bugzilla DB to
PostgreSQL. Both installations have to be running the latest tip code,
and the script is very much in beta status. But it's attached over here:

	https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291776

	You'll need to edit the settings in the beginning of the script to be
correct for your installation.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From kevin.benton at amd.com  Wed May 11 19:38:53 2005
From: kevin.benton at amd.com (Benton, Kevin)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:38:53 -0700
Subject: FW: getting a copy of each email
Message-ID: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42EFF5C2@ssvlexmb2.amd.com>

> is it possible to send a copy of each send email by bugzilla to the
> admin?
> I'm using 2.18rc3 with applied central email patch at a windows
> machine.
> 
> Or do i can enable a logging function to see, what emails were send?

This actually seems like a good idea - I've often wondered who got a
particular email at a given time without having to go through all the
gyrations of rebuilding the bug history to find out...  Even if one does
rebuild the history, if a user has changed their email preferences, they
may not necessarily have gotten an email.  Having a log file helps dodgy
administrators act like "big brother" making sure all recipients that
were supposed to get a bug update actually did.

---
Kevin Benton
Perl/Bugzilla Developer
Advanced Micro Devices
 
The opinions stated in this communication do not necessarily reflect the
view of Advanced Micro Devices and have not been reviewed by management.
This communication may contain sensitive and/or confidential and/or
proprietary information.  Distribution of such information is strictly
prohibited without prior consent of Advanced Micro Devices.  This
communication is for the intended recipient(s) only.  If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender, then
destroy any remaining copies of this communication.




From tiago at async.com.br  Thu May 12 15:40:06 2005
From: tiago at async.com.br (Tiago R. Mello)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:40:06 -0300
Subject: editproducts templatizing
Message-ID: <20050512154006.GA5388@async.com.br>

Hey all!

   I restart the work of templatizing editproducts. Initially, I integrated an
   old patch of the bug 190196 to bugzilla head. However, I thought it would
   be better split it in other bugs. I created the bug 293524 integrating with
   the bug 289580 to avoid conflicts.

   I really need of these changes. I would be greatly appreciated if someone
   could help me to review these codes and land these importants changes.

   Bug summaries:
     190196: editproducts.cgi needs templatizing
     293524: templatize the create/edit products of the editproducts
     289580: Templatize the 'confirm delete' bit of editproducts

Thank you,

Tiago

C'est la vie!

 -------------------------------------------------------
Tiago Rodrigues de Mello   |=| +55 16 9703-2889       
                           |=| <tiago |at| async.com.br>  
Async Open Source - Brasil |=| http://www.async.com.br
 -------------------------------------------------------


From Rahul.Kumar at nsc.com  Fri May 13 06:00:21 2005
From: Rahul.Kumar at nsc.com (Rahul Kumar)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:30:21 +0530
Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
Message-ID: <OFF87A24E2.5109D916-ON65257000.0020ACD4@nsc.com>

Hi,

I am new to Bugzilla. I want to add new tables to the MySQL database, and
perform operations like addition and retrieving from these tables. Can anyone
suggest how to go about making changes to the Bugzilla source.

Thanks in advance
--rahul




From Chris.Raplee at portalplayer.com  Fri May 13 15:53:37 2005
From: Chris.Raplee at portalplayer.com (Chris Raplee)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:53:37 -0700
Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
Message-ID: <59FA134614736A4AB04061CA4B07908C07EA1D@peach.portalplayersc.com>

...with a text editor?

Chris Raplee


-----Original Message-----
From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org
[mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Rahul Kumar
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:00 PM
To: developers at bugzilla.org
Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla


Hi,

I am new to Bugzilla. I want to add new tables to the MySQL database,
and perform operations like addition and retrieving from these tables.
Can anyone suggest how to go about making changes to the Bugzilla
source.

Thanks in advance
--rahul


-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=chris.raplee at portalplayer.co
m>



From zach at zachlipton.com  Fri May 13 16:24:39 2005
From: zach at zachlipton.com (Zach Lipton)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:24:39 -0700
Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
In-Reply-To: <59FA134614736A4AB04061CA4B07908C07EA1D@peach.portalplayersc.com>
References: <59FA134614736A4AB04061CA4B07908C07EA1D@peach.portalplayersc.com>
Message-ID: <6A8E32E0-9ECE-4C91-861B-E9EAC52121A1@zachlipton.com>

Joking aside, it is pretty difficult to know what you are referring  
to here. We could help you better if we knew what you are trying  
achieve. What exactly would you like to make Bugzilla do that it  
doesn't do now?

The general idea is that you would edit Bugzilla::DB::Schema to do  
whatever it is you are trying to do with the table schema. You would  
then modify the cgi scripts to set and retrieve values from your new  
table/column. Lastly, you would need to edit the template files to  
add form controls to set/display these new values. Without more  
specific information, it's really impossible to be more helpful with  
this.

--zach

On May 13, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Chris Raplee wrote:

> ...with a text editor?
>
> Chris Raplee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org
> [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Rahul Kumar
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:00 PM
> To: developers at bugzilla.org
> Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Bugzilla. I want to add new tables to the MySQL database,
> and perform operations like addition and retrieving from these tables.
> Can anyone suggest how to go about making changes to the Bugzilla
> source.
>
> Thanks in advance
> --rahul
>
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr? 
> user=chris.raplee at portalplayer.co
> m>
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=zach at zachlipton.com>
>



From slacroix at vutek.com  Fri May 13 17:25:55 2005
From: slacroix at vutek.com (Scott LaCroix)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:25:55 -0400
Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
Message-ID: <84678A6B0B6B9A4E9562B71E3B8880CA02F00E@vutekex1.VUTEK.CORP>

It's an interesting task... and not simple. 

Make a backup of your existing Bugzilla install ( assuming you have it running already ) so you have something to referr back to. I spent most of a day just changing Bugzilla to report the complete bug descripion ( full and 128 character truncated ) along with the bug summary fields, and that field existed in the DB already. You need to expect that you'll be jumping back and forth between the Schema files, the CGI files, and the template files alot until you understand how they all play together. 

These are the files I ended up touching to do that:
( some of them are in subdirectories so you'll have to poke around )

table.html.tmpl
change-columns.html.tmpl
change-columns.html.tmpl ( there are 2 of these )
colchange.cgi
buglist.cgi
request.cgi
report.cgi
Search.pm
Buzilla.pm

Mind you I didn't ADD any fields, so what you're doing will probably require more work than what I did. 

I'd start with buglist.cgi and report.cgi because those will show you how the tables are read & displayed. Then Search.pm and Buzilla.pm because those will be where you need to make changes to read & write the new fields. I'm not sure where the new fields need to be added, that will require more knowledge than I have.

Good luck!
-
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org
[mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org]On Behalf Of Zach Lipton
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 12:25 PM
To: developers at bugzilla.org
Subject: Re: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla


Joking aside, it is pretty difficult to know what you are referring  
to here. We could help you better if we knew what you are trying  
achieve. What exactly would you like to make Bugzilla do that it  
doesn't do now?

The general idea is that you would edit Bugzilla::DB::Schema to do  
whatever it is you are trying to do with the table schema. You would  
then modify the cgi scripts to set and retrieve values from your new  
table/column. Lastly, you would need to edit the template files to  
add form controls to set/display these new values. Without more  
specific information, it's really impossible to be more helpful with  
this.

--zach

On May 13, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Chris Raplee wrote:

> ...with a text editor?
>
> Chris Raplee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org
> [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Rahul Kumar
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:00 PM
> To: developers at bugzilla.org
> Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Bugzilla. I want to add new tables to the MySQL database,
> and perform operations like addition and retrieving from these tables.
> Can anyone suggest how to go about making changes to the Bugzilla
> source.
>
> Thanks in advance
> --rahul
>
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr? 
> user=chris.raplee at portalplayer.co
> m>
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=zach at zachlipton.com>
>

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=slacroix at vutek.com>



From Rahul.Kumar at nsc.com  Sun May 15 07:29:55 2005
From: Rahul.Kumar at nsc.com (Rahul Kumar)
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:59:55 +0530
Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
Message-ID: <OFB0D491CA.443E69F0-ON65257001.00211B54@nsc.com>

The tables i want to add to the existing schema are

----------------------------
-----------------------------------
|    Vendor                 |                               |  Vendor Product
|
----------------------------
-----------------------------------
| id            |                   | id              |
| name                |                   | name                  |
| Priority            |                   | vendor_id       |
| status              |                   | contact         |
----------------------------
------------------------------------

Changes to bug table are, only additional columns are shown

---------------------------------------
| bug                 |
---------------------------------------
| vendor_request_number |
| action owner              |
| tracking_note             |
| vendorproduct_id          |
---------------------------------------

I have already made changes to the checksetup.pl file to add the new tables to
the bugs database. What are the additional perl scripts that need ?
Moreover, what is the purpose of the file 'versioncache' ?

--rahul



                                                                                                
                      "Zach Lipton"                                                             
                      <zach at zachlipton.c        To:       developers at bugzilla.org               
                      om>                       cc:                                             
                      Sent by:                  Subject:  Re: Addition of New tables to         
                      developers-owner at b         Bugzilla                                       
                      ugzilla.org                                                               
                                                                                                
                                                                                                
                      05/13/05 09:54 PM                                                         
                      Please respond to                                                         
                      developers                                                                
                                                                                                
                                                                                                




Joking aside, it is pretty difficult to know what you are referring
to here. We could help you better if we knew what you are trying
achieve. What exactly would you like to make Bugzilla do that it
doesn't do now?

The general idea is that you would edit Bugzilla::DB::Schema to do
whatever it is you are trying to do with the table schema. You would
then modify the cgi scripts to set and retrieve values from your new
table/column. Lastly, you would need to edit the template files to
add form controls to set/display these new values. Without more
specific information, it's really impossible to be more helpful with
this.

--zach

On May 13, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Chris Raplee wrote:

> ...with a text editor?
>
> Chris Raplee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org
> [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Rahul Kumar
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:00 PM
> To: developers at bugzilla.org
> Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Bugzilla. I want to add new tables to the MySQL database,
> and perform operations like addition and retrieving from these tables.
> Can anyone suggest how to go about making changes to the Bugzilla
> source.
>
> Thanks in advance
> --rahul
>
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?
> user=chris.raplee at portalplayer.co
> m>
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=zach at zachlipton.com>
>

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=rahul.kumar at nsc.com>







From Rahul.Kumar at nsc.com  Sun May 15 07:37:20 2005
From: Rahul.Kumar at nsc.com (Rahul Kumar)
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:07:20 +0530
Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
Message-ID: <OF81FF847A.CD7E39B6-ON65257002.002995DA@nsc.com>

In my earlier mail, the tables were not shown properly here it is again

The tables i want to add to the existing schema are

Vendor
-----------
id
name
priority
status

Vendor Product
------------------------
id
name
vendor_id
contact

additional columns in bug table

bug
-------
vendor_request_number
action owner
tracking_note
vendorproduct_id

I have already made changes to the checksetup.pl file to add the new tables to
the bugs database. What are the additional perl scripts that need to be changed
?
Moreover, what is the purpose of the file 'versioncache' ?

--rahul




                                                                                                                                       
                      "Rahul Kumar"                                                                                                    
                      <Rahul.Kumar at nsc.c        To:       developers at bugzilla.org                                                      
                      om>                       cc:                                                                                    
                      Sent by:                  Subject:  Re: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla                                       
                      developers-owner at b                                                                                               
                      ugzilla.org                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       
                      05/15/05 12:59 PM                                                                                                
                      Please respond to                                                                                                
                      developers                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       




The tables i want to add to the existing schema are

----------------------------
-----------------------------------
|    Vendor                 |                               |  Vendor Product
|
----------------------------
-----------------------------------
| id            |                   | id              |
| name                |                   | name                  |
| Priority            |                   | vendor_id       |
| status              |                   | contact         |
----------------------------
------------------------------------

Changes to bug table are, only additional columns are shown

---------------------------------------
| bug                 |
---------------------------------------
| vendor_request_number |
| action owner              |
| tracking_note             |
| vendorproduct_id          |
---------------------------------------

I have already made changes to the checksetup.pl file to add the new tables to
the bugs database. What are the additional perl scripts that need ?
Moreover, what is the purpose of the file 'versioncache' ?

--rahul




                      "Zach Lipton"

                      <zach at zachlipton.c        To:
developers at bugzilla.org
                      om>                       cc:

                      Sent by:                  Subject:  Re: Addition of New
tables to
                      developers-owner at b         Bugzilla

                      ugzilla.org



                      05/13/05 09:54 PM

                      Please respond to

                      developers







Joking aside, it is pretty difficult to know what you are referring
to here. We could help you better if we knew what you are trying
achieve. What exactly would you like to make Bugzilla do that it
doesn't do now?

The general idea is that you would edit Bugzilla::DB::Schema to do
whatever it is you are trying to do with the table schema. You would
then modify the cgi scripts to set and retrieve values from your new
table/column. Lastly, you would need to edit the template files to
add form controls to set/display these new values. Without more
specific information, it's really impossible to be more helpful with
this.

--zach

On May 13, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Chris Raplee wrote:

> ...with a text editor?
>
> Chris Raplee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org
> [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org] On Behalf Of Rahul Kumar
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:00 PM
> To: developers at bugzilla.org
> Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Bugzilla. I want to add new tables to the MySQL database,
> and perform operations like addition and retrieving from these tables.
> Can anyone suggest how to go about making changes to the Bugzilla
> source.
>
> Thanks in advance
> --rahul
>
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?
> user=chris.raplee at portalplayer.co
> m>
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=zach at zachlipton.com>
>

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=rahul.kumar at nsc.com>





-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=rahul.kumar at nsc.com>







From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Sun May 15 07:51:34 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 00:51:34 -0700
Subject: Addition of New tables to Bugzilla
In-Reply-To: <OF81FF847A.CD7E39B6-ON65257002.002995DA@nsc.com>
References: <OF81FF847A.CD7E39B6-ON65257002.002995DA@nsc.com>
Message-ID: <1116143494.5996.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 13:07 +0530, Rahul Kumar wrote:
> The tables i want to add to the existing schema are
> I have already made changes to the checksetup.pl file to add the new tables to
> the bugs database. What are the additional perl scripts that need to be changed

	This is probably a question better asked on the mozilla-webtools
mailing list, which you can see the link to on
http://www.bugzilla.org/support/ -- adding columns and tables to a
database is very easy; adding an interface to Bugzilla to use them is
very complex, and it involves a lot of changes, so many that we couldn't
easily describe them all here on the mailing list.

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From kiko at async.com.br  Wed May 18 00:56:37 2005
From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:56:37 -0300
Subject: Copyright notices [bugzilla-daemon@mozilla.org: [Bug 294160] move product related routines into the new Products.pm]
Message-ID: <20050518005637.GB31487@www.async.com.br>


I have a special query spawned in bugmail from bug 294160, as below -- I
was almost sure that Products.pm, being at least partially derived from
editproducts.cgi, should retain the original copyright notice and
contributor list.

----- Forwarded message from bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org -----

>+# The Initial Developer of the Original Code is Netscape Communications
>+# Corporation. Portions created by Netscape are
>+# Copyright (C) 1998 Netscape Communications Corporation. All
>+# Rights Reserved.

  And yes, LpSolit is right about this -- this should be either Tiago or Async.

----- End forwarded message -----

Who's right? Gerv and Dave have laid down the law on this before, but my
memory is broken.

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125


From gerv at mozilla.org  Wed May 18 19:29:52 2005
From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:29:52 +0100
Subject: Copyright notices [bugzilla-daemon@mozilla.org: [Bug 294160]
In-Reply-To: <20050518005637.GB31487@www.async.com.br>
References: <20050518005637.GB31487@www.async.com.br>
Message-ID: <428B97B0.4020807@mozilla.org>

Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> I have a special query spawned in bugmail from bug 294160, as below -- I
> was almost sure that Products.pm, being at least partially derived from
> editproducts.cgi, should retain the original copyright notice and
> contributor list.

Yes - unless a file is a totally new creation, in which case the creator 
is the Original Developer, then you should use the Original Developer 
section from the base file. If there are multiple base files, use the 
one you took most code from, and add the other entity as a Contributor.

Gerv


From Guillaume.Rousse at inria.fr  Wed May 25 09:16:57 2005
From: Guillaume.Rousse at inria.fr (Guillaume Rousse)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 11:16:57 +0200
Subject: bugzilla 2.18.1 in cooker
Message-ID: <42944289.3010300@inria.fr>

There is a bugzilla package in cooker (mandriva development
distribution). The spec file and applied patches can be found at
http://cvs.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/contrib-SPECS/bugzilla/

As Debian people, we try to enforce FHS setup even for web applications.
I think they are several advantages that could even be interesting for
upstream developpers:
- added security, as there is no need to deny access to content that is
not exposed under a web root
- easier way to find modules by relying on perl standard loading
mechanism, instead of relying on file position (see the problems in for
contrib)

I'm perfectly aware however this kind of setup break platform
interoperability, and is not adapted to upstream concerns. However, we
may eventually found some intermediate step that would help packagers
without crippling developers concerns ?

For instance, the current archive is quite ugly: I don't see the point
of shipping CVS files, and files with non-standard perms, thus needing
to be corrected later during installation. This should be done beforehand.
-- 
The more terrible a food is, the healthier it is.
		-- Rule for bad courses


From jake at bugzilla.org  Wed May 25 13:58:12 2005
From: jake at bugzilla.org (Jake)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:58:12 -0400
Subject: bugzilla 2.18.1 in cooker
In-Reply-To: <42944289.3010300@inria.fr>
References: <42944289.3010300@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <42948474.5030704@bugzilla.org>

Guillaume Rousse wrote:

>For instance, the current archive is quite ugly: I don't see the point
>of shipping CVS files [...]
>  
>
We intentionally ship the CVS files to allow for easier upgrades using
CVS in the future if so desired by the admin.


From mkanat at bugzilla.org  Wed May 25 23:56:19 2005
From: mkanat at bugzilla.org (Max Kanat-Alexander)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:56:19 -0700
Subject: User Account Creation works in PostgreSQL, now
Message-ID: <1117065380.6409.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>

	OK, as of a few days ago, you can successfully create a user account in
a PostgreSQL installation. That means that if anybody wanted to use the
PostgreSQL testing installation to help debug PostgreSQL Bugzilla, you
now can, if you needed to create a user account to do it:

	http://landfill.bugzilla.org/bugzilla-tip-pg/

	-Max
-- 
http://www.everythingsolved.com/
Everything Solved: Experts at Bugzilla... and everything else, too.



From justdave at bugzilla.org  Thu May 26 14:27:05 2005
From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:27:05 -0400
Subject: bugzilla 2.18.1 in cooker
In-Reply-To: <42944289.3010300@inria.fr>
References: <42944289.3010300@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <4295DCB9.9070208@bugzilla.org>

Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> There is a bugzilla package in cooker (mandriva development
> distribution). The spec file and applied patches can be found at
> http://cvs.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/contrib-SPECS/bugzilla/

Cool!

> As Debian people, we try to enforce FHS setup even for web applications.

> I'm perfectly aware however this kind of setup break platform
> interoperability, and is not adapted to upstream concerns. However, we
> may eventually found some intermediate step that would help packagers
> without crippling developers concerns ?

The goal is to have packagers be able to get Bugzilla working wherever 
they want it by only needing to patch the Bugzilla/Config.pm file.

There's been a lot of progress on this already, as I'm sure you've 
noticed (your patch for 2.18.x is a LOT smaller than the one you needed 
for 2.16.x, for example).  Alexis Sukrieh (the maintainer of the Debian 
package) has been working on this a fair bit...  he'd be a good person 
to work with on making the pieces that are left happen.

> For instance, the current archive is quite ugly: I don't see the point
> of shipping CVS files, and files with non-standard perms, thus needing
> to be corrected later during installation. This should be done beforehand.

The permissions thing is fairly common practice among software 
distributions.  It's a side effect of using CVS for the source control, 
which has no care about permissions, and screws them up frequently.  It 
would have to be done from a script one way or another, whether it's 
done before rolling the tarball or at install time.  RPM includes 
commands for the %install section of your spec file for exactly this 
reason to set the default permissions of installed files, if you don't 
want to use our script to do it. :)

And yes, as Max pointed out, we ship the CVS files on purpose, because 
it makes upgrading a lot easier for people who customize it.  Those can 
easily be excluded in an RPM.

-- 
Dave Miller                                   http://www.justdave.net/
System Administrator, Mozilla Foundation       http://www.mozilla.org/
Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System  http://www.bugzilla.org/


From justdave at bugzilla.org  Thu May 26 14:36:25 2005
From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:36:25 -0400
Subject: bugzilla 2.18.1 in cooker
In-Reply-To: <4295DCB9.9070208@bugzilla.org>
References: <42944289.3010300@inria.fr> <4295DCB9.9070208@bugzilla.org>
Message-ID: <4295DEE9.9030100@bugzilla.org>

David Miller wrote:

> And yes, as Max pointed out, we ship the CVS files on purpose

Er, actually that was Jake. :)  Sorry

-- 
Dave Miller                                   http://www.justdave.net/
System Administrator, Mozilla Foundation       http://www.mozilla.org/
Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System  http://www.bugzilla.org/


From jpyeron at pdinc.us  Thu May 26 15:00:04 2005
From: jpyeron at pdinc.us (Jason Pyeron)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 11:00:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: bugzilla 2.18.1 in cooker
In-Reply-To: <4295DCB9.9070208@bugzilla.org>
References: <42944289.3010300@inria.fr> <4295DCB9.9070208@bugzilla.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505261056470.29615@ns.pyerotechnics.com>

On Thu, 26 May 2005, David Miller wrote:

> And yes, as Max pointed out, we ship the CVS files on purpose, because it 
> makes upgrading a lot easier for people who customize it.  Those can easily 
> be excluded in an RPM.

Since the CVS files don't conflict, package 2 RPMs

1) The bugzilla files
2) The CVS files


I know upgrading by CVS would defeat the RPM install but, it is a option.


rpm -i bugzilla.rpm

rpm -i bugzilla-CVS.rpm

-Jason Pyeron


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Partner & Sr. Manager             7 West 24th Street #100     -
- +1 (410) 808-6646 (c)             Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you 
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and 
notify the sender immediately.  Any other use of the email by you 
is prohibited.


From justdave at bugzilla.org  Thu May 26 15:14:43 2005
From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 11:14:43 -0400
Subject: bugzilla 2.18.1 in cooker
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505261056470.29615@ns.pyerotechnics.com>
References: <42944289.3010300@inria.fr> <4295DCB9.9070208@bugzilla.org> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505261056470.29615@ns.pyerotechnics.com>
Message-ID: <4295E7E3.4020304@bugzilla.org>

Jason Pyeron wrote:

> Since the CVS files don't conflict, package 2 RPMs
> 
> 1) The bugzilla files
> 2) The CVS files

Nah, I wouldn't even bother.  If you got Bugzilla via an RPM, 99% chance 
you're gonna want to upgrade it that way, too :)

-- 
Dave Miller                                   http://www.justdave.net/
System Administrator, Mozilla Foundation       http://www.mozilla.org/
Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System  http://www.bugzilla.org/


From Martin.Danjou at neterion.com  Tue May 31 15:44:33 2005
From: Martin.Danjou at neterion.com (Martin d'Anjou)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:44:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: template to create a bug tree
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311129530.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>

Hi,

I am trying to create a set of templates that gives the ability to create
multiple bugs with one form: one bug per component selected on the form.

The idea is to have one "root" bug with 0 or more children bugs that block 
the root bug. I have started creating new templates based on the existing 
templates.

Specifically, I am trying to put a loop around the core of the code inside 
post_bug.cgi.

Am I re-inventing the wheel?
Is this the right approach, is there a better one, any suggestions?

Thanks,
Martin




From kiko at async.com.br  Tue May 31 16:21:31 2005
From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:21:31 -0300
Subject: template to create a bug tree
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311129530.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311129530.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>
Message-ID: <20050531162131.GK6146@www.async.com.br>

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:44:33AM -0400, Martin d'Anjou wrote:
> I am trying to create a set of templates that gives the ability to create
> multiple bugs with one form: one bug per component selected on the form.
> 
> The idea is to have one "root" bug with 0 or more children bugs that block 
> the root bug. I have started creating new templates based on the existing 
> templates.
> 
> Specifically, I am trying to put a loop around the core of the code inside 
> post_bug.cgi.
> 
> Am I re-inventing the wheel?
> Is this the right approach, is there a better one, any suggestions?

We've worked at Async on a CSV-based uploader that might do what you
want; it's pretty raw bug we could do some polish on it if you'd be
interested in that sort of UI.

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125


From Martin.Danjou at neterion.com  Tue May 31 19:18:35 2005
From: Martin.Danjou at neterion.com (Martin d'Anjou)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:18:35 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: passing several $vars to template
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311505200.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>

Hi again,

I have a template which creates many bugs at once. I would like to produce
an output similar to the one you get when you commit changes to several
bugs at once.

I have something like this at the end of my post_bug_tree template 
(inspired from post_bug.html.tmpl):

$template->process("bug/create/created_tree.html.tmpl", $vars)

Can someone show me how to pass multiple bugs through $vars to the 
template?

Thanks,
Martin



From kiko at async.com.br  Tue May 31 19:27:05 2005
From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:27:05 -0300
Subject: passing several $vars to template
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311505200.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311505200.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>
Message-ID: <20050531192705.GO6146@www.async.com.br>

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Martin d'Anjou wrote:
> $template->process("bug/create/created_tree.html.tmpl", $vars)
> 
> Can someone show me how to pass multiple bugs through $vars to the 
> template?

Just have $vars hold a member which is an array of Bug objects, instead
of data on a single bug. I believe summarize_time.cgi does that.

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125


From Martin.Danjou at neterion.com  Tue May 31 20:30:36 2005
From: Martin.Danjou at neterion.com (Martin d'Anjou)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: passing several $vars to template
In-Reply-To: <20050531192705.GO6146@www.async.com.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311627510.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>

> > $template->process("bug/create/created_tree.html.tmpl", $vars)
> > 
> > Can someone show me how to pass multiple bugs through $vars to the 
> > template?
> 
> Just have $vars hold a member which is an array of Bug objects, instead
> of data on a single bug. I believe summarize_time.cgi does that.

Thanks, it worked. Can you please help me some more? Once I get inside the 
template, is it possible to create a loop that goes through all the Bug 
objects and print a list of messages:

Bug N has been added to the database ...
Bug N+1 has been added to the database ...
Bug N+2 has been added to the database ...
...

I tried the following but it does not work, so I'm digging more into it.  
Is this the right approach for this problem?

[% FOREACH bugitem = bug %]
  [% FOREACH item = bugitem.sentmail %]
    [% PROCESS bug/process/results.html.tmpl
       type = item.type
       id = item.id
       mail = item.mail
     %]
  [% END %]
[% END %]

Thanks,
Martin
PS: my last sent bounced, this is a resend.



From Martin.Danjou at neterion.com  Tue May 31 20:45:57 2005
From: Martin.Danjou at neterion.com (Martin d'Anjou)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:45:57 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Got it!! passing several $vars to template
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311627510.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0505311639030.29286-100000@martin.s2io.com>

> Thanks, it worked. Can you please help me some more? Once I get inside the 
> template, is it possible to create a loop that goes through all the Bug 
> objects and print a list of messages:
> 
> Bug N has been added to the database ...
> Bug N+1 has been added to the database ...
> Bug N+2 has been added to the database ...
> ...
> 
> I tried the following but it does not work, so I'm digging more into it.  
> Is this the right approach for this problem?
> 
> [% FOREACH bugitem = bug %]
>   [% FOREACH item = bugitem.sentmail %]
>     [% PROCESS bug/process/results.html.tmpl
>        type = item.type
>        id = item.id
>        mail = item.mail
>      %]
>   [% END %]
> [% END %]
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin
> PS: my last sent bounced, this is a resend.

Actually, it is much easier than that... I just noticed that
$vars->{'sendmail'} has one item per bug, so I do not need the outer loop.
To create multiple bugs at once, e.g. create the loop inside the
post_bug.cgi, all I need is to move "$vars->{'sendmail'} = [];" to the
begining of the loop. When I am done the loop, pass $vars along to the
created.html.tmpl template, et voila!

Martin