Stalled custom field development

[Tomas Kopal]

On 24.3.2005 03:06, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 08:30 -0800, Benton, Kevin wrote:
> 
>>Your pseudo code brings up a great point.  For readability, I think we
>>ought to get into the habit of using the optional "AS" when renaming
>>tables as a rule.
> 
> 
> 	Oh, we already have to, for PostgreSQL. I'm pretty sure we're doing
> that now in the whole code.
> 

Actually, we don't have to, even Postgres works without it :-). But I am 
adding it everywhere because it is *much* more readable with it... And I 
agree that it should be part of the coding standard. for Bugzilla.

Tomas