making review/bug filing optional for some docs changes

Luis Villa luis.villa at gmail.com
Fri Mar 18 18:30:14 UTC 2005


On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:52:37 -0500 (EST), Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Benton, Kevin wrote:
> 
> >
> > Because we're maintaining enterprise-level software (and we advertise it
> > that way), we need to handle it as an enterprise-level entity would.  In
> > my experience at that level, to ensure high quality, any time a change
> > is put in place that could impact a customer, a release process needs to
> > be followed.  Because documentation is viewed by our "customers," I feel
> > it should be kept inside the release process.  This prevents human error
> > from leaking out.  Note I didn't say eliminate human error.  It's
> 
> Our customers could not tolerate anything less.

Wow. That sounds incredibly stiflingly unfun. Glad people are paid to
work on this now...

Luis



More information about the developers mailing list