making review/bug filing optional for some docs changes
Luis Villa
luis.villa at gmail.com
Fri Mar 18 18:30:14 UTC 2005
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:52:37 -0500 (EST), Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Benton, Kevin wrote:
>
> >
> > Because we're maintaining enterprise-level software (and we advertise it
> > that way), we need to handle it as an enterprise-level entity would. In
> > my experience at that level, to ensure high quality, any time a change
> > is put in place that could impact a customer, a release process needs to
> > be followed. Because documentation is viewed by our "customers," I feel
> > it should be kept inside the release process. This prevents human error
> > from leaking out. Note I didn't say eliminate human error. It's
>
> Our customers could not tolerate anything less.
Wow. That sounds incredibly stiflingly unfun. Glad people are paid to
work on this now...
Luis
More information about the developers
mailing list