making review/bug filing optional for some docs changes
Joel Peshkin
bugreport at peshkin.net
Fri Mar 18 02:21:49 UTC 2005
Myk Melez wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I suggest we make review and bug filing optional for some docs changes
> made by a group of trusted docs writers. Although waiving these steps
> means more bugs, it also means more docs improvements, and I think the
> benefits outweigh the costs for a set of docs writers with known good
> skills. Instead of rehashing all the arguments, please find below
> most of the IRC discussion on the subject.
>
> -myk
>
This sounds like a good idea, so long as there is some guidance given to
that group. In the same breath, I would like to see a clarification of
the rules for docs changes. Is it safe to say that a doc change by
anyone needs ONLY a single review, no approval, and can be checked in?
More information about the developers
mailing list