Release schedule plans
Nick.Barnes at pobox.com
Wed Jan 12 16:10:10 UTC 2005
At 2005-01-12 15:43:18+0000, Vlad Dascalu writes:
> Nick Barnes wrote:
> >Yes. Speaking as a recipient[*], I have learned to totally ignore
> I think you just proved that you haven't :-). Out of 3 mails that you
> sent in this thread, 2 are dedicated to the flame thing. :-) And one of
> those only gave food to the flame to grow bigger.
You are incorrect. I have sent three mails in this thread:
1. Message-ID: <65482.1105360826 at thrush.ravenbrook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:40:26 +0000
Direct response to justdave's initial message, discussing freezes,
2. Message-ID: <71844.1105463250 at thrush.ravenbrook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:07:30 +0000
Pointing out that b.m.o is testing 2.20 more than 2.18.
3. Message-ID: <74627.1105531431 at thrush.ravenbrook.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:03:51 +0000
The message to which you are responding, and which was not, of
course, responding to a flame. I was responding to a fairly polite
message discussing flame-handling policies.
More information about the developers