Release schedule plans

[Nick Barnes]

At 2005-01-12 15:43:18+0000, Vlad Dascalu writes:
> Nick Barnes wrote:
> 
> >Yes.  Speaking as a recipient[*], I have learned to totally ignore
> >flamers
> >
> I think you just proved that you haven't :-). Out of 3 mails that you 
> sent in this thread, 2 are dedicated to the flame thing. :-) And one of 
> those only gave food to the flame to grow bigger.

You are incorrect.  I have sent three mails in this thread:

1. Message-ID: <65482.1105360826 at thrush.ravenbrook.com>
   Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:40:26 +0000

   Direct response to justdave's initial message, discussing freezes,
   ASCIIgrams, etc.

2. Message-ID: <71844.1105463250 at thrush.ravenbrook.com>
   Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:07:30 +0000

   Pointing out that b.m.o is testing 2.20 more than 2.18.

3. Message-ID: <74627.1105531431 at thrush.ravenbrook.com>
   Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:03:51 +0000

   The message to which you are responding, and which was not, of
   course, responding to a flame.  I was responding to a fairly polite
   message discussing flame-handling policies.

Nick B