Release schedule plans

[Gervase Markham]

Nick Barnes wrote:
> At 2005-01-10 11:47:30+0000, David Miller writes:

Having checked my spam folder, I don't seem to have the original in this 
thread - did anyone else get it?

>>Correcting for accuracy from the IRC log (after I drew the little 
>>chart), this would actually give us 6 active branches (eek!) at one 
>>point (counting the trunk), but we'll always have 4 in the long run once 
>>the dust settles.  

I don't like the sound of that at all. Currently we are managing three, 
and it's more than enough. I'd argue this is a reason to either extend 
the development cycle or shorten the support cycle.

Gerv