Development process analysis
gerv at mozilla.org
Sat Jan 8 22:12:12 UTC 2005
Vlad Dascalu wrote:
> Secondly, this 6-month thing never got the chance to run in a normal
That's my point! So we shouldn't be doing re-analysis until we've had a
chance to see what will happen when we actually implement this plan.
> Thirdly, the whole aim of "Shorter development cycles" would be broken
> if we'd do what you suggest, by pushing/enlarging this particular
> development cycle.
Oh, you mean the 9 month thing. That was just an add-on to the main
point of what I'm saying - like I said, a separate discussion.
More information about the developers