Enums

[Gervase Markham]

Shane H. W. Travis wrote:
> Also, Gerv, I think you're mistaking 'discussion' for 'movement' on Custom
> Fields. Right now there's a proposal (and a patch) on the table that appears
> to be unacceptable to several people. If that gets shot down, we're right
> back where we started; nowhere.
> 
> If the ENUMS patch is ready to go, then don't hold it up in favour of some
> future developments that may or may not come to pass.

Fair enough. Just a thought.

Gerv