Some contributions

[Christian Robottom Reis]

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 07:00:53AM -0700, Joel Peshkin wrote:
> 1) Get consensus on the way this interacts with the Bugzilla schema, 
> Search, and Fielddefs.    When you do get to looking at fielddefs, I 
> suspect you will find that you will want to propose some enhancements to 
> Fielddefs first.  It would be a big help if fielddefs knew about more 
> characteristics of a field than it currently does.  It is probably the 
> most effective way for all of the rest of the code to become aware of 
> any new fields and how they should be handled.
> 
> 2) Implement the fielddefs changes. [probably land this change with no 
> new feature]

Yes! Having an enhanced fielddefs (having *methods* per fielddefs, even)
would make cleaning up the code in parts a *lot* easier. I'd say it's an
excellent first step.

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3361 2331