Partial custom fields design document
gerv at mozilla.org
Sat Mar 27 11:04:12 UTC 2004
Harri Vartiainen wrote:
> There's "semi-official" term for nit-picking features to death, analysis
I'd say that's a bit unfair. A couple of weeks ago, someone said "Look,
we really need to sort out custom fields." A consensus was established
that this was a good idea, and a week ago a design document was posted.
It's already had some review, and the large issues are being identified
by those most able to identify them (e.g. I mentioned l10n, others have
raised schema queries, and so on.)
I don't think we're doing too badly.
More information about the developers